I know it's hard but it's better to bite the bullet and get it done ASAP as you only have a month to get it in, same with the tribunal appeal, and I don't think they let you have an extension.Well, I'm playing at "ignore it for now", but I know I must do clever stuff soon. So we'll have to encourage each other.
I had a brown envelope arrive 2 weeks ago and dreaded opening it. When I finally did it was from PC world wanting to know if I wanted to buy extended cover for my computer monitor.I do agree very much about the terror and stress of the brown envelopes.
I'd ask that he be investigated with a view to misconduct - if you give them the lesser option of a retraining recommendation then that's an easy way out. Check what Pauline cafferkey (I think that's her name, nurse who caught ebola) got accused of, she had to go before a panel for something like fraud and misrepresentation.Good on you, they are obviously not relenting, why should we?
I'm currently working on a letter to the Nursing Medical Council regarding the "nurse" who included over 20 lies and inaccuracies in his WCA report, asking that he be retrained or even struck off as not fit for practice.
Does anyone have any tips on doing a mandatory reconsideration as i have only done one when I got sanctioned last year. Can't even find the motivation to pick up a pen at the moment.
Think I heard her interviewed on the radio. Good to hear that perspective from the (former) inside.Did anyone see the guardian article about the former dwp worker who turned their experiences into a play? They were made redundant and got threatened with sanctions if they were late to appointments. Sadly they were very much on the side of the claimants but were bullied into sanctions by managers.
...
I don't trust the dwp one bit.
She was wrong, I think - as you say, once appeal has been accepted, I can then claim ESA at assessment rate.
Seems to be standard practice these days. Sister recently put in a mandatory reconsideration for PIP through a solicitor and still got 0 points.Sorry the mandatory reconsideration was refused
Seems to be standard practice these days.
It seems to be an intentional delaying tactic designed to fuck people over, I haven't heard of one successful mandatory reconsideration.
It seems to be an intentional delaying tactic designed to fuck people over, I haven't heard of one successful mandatory reconsideration.
It seems to be an intentional delaying tactic designed to fuck people over, I haven't heard of one successful mandatory reconsideration.
I think you're right sadly
Yep. What's so frustrating is that it seems so difficult for people to recognise that. On a thread like this, we're mostly preaching to the choir - but for others to be bothered, they have to be interested enough to see it as a problem, too.MR is just another hoop the DWP have devised, trying to get claimants to "give up" so 'the figures' look better and they can pretend to be saving money on the welfare budget.
I agree with that ! and spend a certain amount of time trying to convert more members to our choir.
But, as you say, the gov't has been very carefully exploiting a particular aspect of the "them and us" narrative. In my opinion, the thatcherite greed one coupled with "there is no such thing as society" theme.
social solidarities become more and more important, and the potential for a "flowering" of solidaristic communities becomes far more likely.