Are you an archist but not a member of an archist organisation?

[platinumsage]

If you're not an anarchist or ochlocracist, then presumably you think some organisation should rule over us. If that's your view, I think the bare minimum you should be doing is being a member of a candidate organsiation to further their goal of exerting authority over everyone else. If you're not joined up, you're basically clearing the way for whoever else to come along and exert their power, so thanks for that.

This might appear like a facetious thread but it's not - I'm genuinely perplexed about how non-anarchists can philosophically justify not joining any grouping that aims to take power. If you think there aren't any remotely suitable organisations then surely you either start one or redefine yourself as an anarchist?

 

[Monte]

I'm also an Antichrist.
Don't know what I want
But I know how to get it