Or saying I'm a libertarian marxist or a dialectical materialist, which just makes most people look at you a bit funny.
Yes, that's the point.Actually most people don’t understand those terms or give a fuck. So perhaps in your little bubble It may be grotesque but not really anywhere else.
Yes, that's the point.
I do, but I think that's inherent in 'proper' Marxism. Libertarian is to distinguish from the Stalinist school and those who believe in a 'strong state' generallyYou agree with bottom up rather than top down? If so, we agree. That’s what I mean by libertarian.
I do, but I think that's inherent in 'proper' Marxism. Libertarian is to distinguish from the Stalinist school and those who believe in a 'strong state' generally
Marx's analysis of capitalism was spot on and very far-sighted. I would have thought even capitalists themselves could see that.
He should have just left it at that with a 'you work out the answers' sign-off.
balance? like there's only anarchism and marxism? what about non-marxian socialism?Just for balance, like.
It’s fucking worthless. Like non Marxist anarchism.balance? like there's only anarchism and marxism? what about non-marxian socialism?
ideologies like leninism may found themselves on marx's work but that doesn't mean they're a progression from his workIn many ways he did, didn't he? There was supposed to be a third volume of Capital, which is itself more a theoretical than a practical work. Ideologies like Leninism build on top of Marx's work.
ideologies like leninism may found themselves on marx's work but that doesn't mean they're a progression from his work
what i mean by a progression is a positive development. it may be a development of certain aspects of marx's thought but that doesn't make it more progressive - quite the contrary, imo.I don't like Leninism either, but I don't know whether or not they're a "progression" from Marx, whatever that means.
It's coming out in 1894.There was supposed to be a third volume of Capital,