cupid_stunt
Chief seagull hater & farmerbarleymow's nemesis.
Blimey, I wasn't expecting charges that serious.
Blimey, I wasn't expecting charges that serious.
Yep. By some distance the real issue is whether he did it or not, but it's going to be very high stakes as a case.I wasn't either.
Bloody hell.
The PF must be sure that they have a strong case.
Yes it's already affecting the SNP. This is in the background to some of the criticism Sturgeon is getting with the party about the her position on the UK leaving the EU.
Yep. By some distance the real issue is whether he did it or not, but it's going to be very high stakes as a case.
Please don't call her that.I can view the putrid fish's discombobulation with the utmost equanimity.
Please don't call her that.
Why?Please don't call her that.
Because it's misogyny.Why?
Urban has a strong and fine tradition of total irreverence towards politicians. Cameron's a pig fucker, Clegg's a cunt, etc, etc.
Putrid Fish for Sturgeon seems quite restrained!
Eh?Because it's misogyny.
Quite.Eh?
Why?
Her name is Sturgeon. Sturgeon is a fish. Sas dislikes her, hence putrid. Where's the misogyny?
'Fish' is male gay/drag queen slang for women, is the problem. Use your imagination for why it's problematic.Eh?
Why?
Her name is Sturgeon. Sturgeon is a fish. Sas dislikes her, hence putrid. Where's the misogyny?
Even if he knew that (which I doubt) that's not the context it was used in, is it?'Fish' is male gay/drag queen slang for women, is the problem. Use your imagination for why it's problematic.
I can honestly say that I have never heard that before.'Fish' is male gay/drag queen slang for women, is the problem. Use your imagination for why it's problematic.
I had to look it up.I can honestly say that I have never heard that before.
Every day's a schoolday.fish biological women used primarily by gay men, either in a positive or derogatory way.
also used by gay men to complement female looking drag queens or transgender women that appear 'real' or too convincing to be men.
He is indeed.Alex Salmond is a putrid fish too.
Mr Etiquette is someone I don’t miss hearing from in the least.Personally, I'm waiting for his workmate's 2 penneth, Mr G Galloway.
I can honestly say that I have never heard that before.
I had to look it up.
Every day's a schoolday.
Given that you're not a homosexual man I'm not sure you need to worry.
You're learning.Well, on the testimony of these two renowned champions of women's rights I think this debate is over.
What stunned me was both the seriousness and number of the charges. I'm sure that's been the reaction of most people. This is extremely serious, and Salmond is a very prominent person still. I don't want to in any way underplay the seriousness by going at a tangent. But while we have to now let the proceedings take their course, there is no doubt that this will affect the political situation in Scotland.Blimey, I wasn't expecting charges that serious.
Agree with all that danny. Sturgeon is a canny enough politician to know that if a second independence referendum is lost such a relatively short time after the first then it's off the cards for years. These events can't have encouraged her to push for a referendum this Spring/Summer like some favour.So the events of yesterday must have been something she knew was possible. How much has it impacted on her planning for her Brexit response?
BBC said:
I doubt situations often get to this stage when nothing at all has happened.''I refute absolutely these allegations of criminality'' (my bold)
Read carefully that says things happened but I deny they were criminal things. Obviously that's 100% speculation, but I know politicians, I know lawyers, and I know English. I know what that statement can 'truthfully' cover.
It’s wording that he’s been using since this became public, along with telling the BBC that he was "no saint" and has "got flaws".''I refute absolutely these allegations of criminality'' (my bold)
Read carefully that says things happened but I deny they were criminal things. Obviously that's 100% speculation, but I know politicians, I know lawyers, and I know English. I know what that statement can truthfull cover.
Yeah, I thought when I read it yesterday that it seems like a very deliberate and specific choice of words.''I refute absolutely these allegations of criminality'' (my bold)
Read carefully that says things happened but I deny they were criminal things. Obviously that's 100% speculation, but I know politicians, I know lawyers, and I know English. I know what that statement can 'truthfully' cover.
If his defence is that this was a misunderstanding, he will have to explain how there came to be 14 misunderstandings over whatever timescale it emerges these alleged events took place.
Indeed. The whole situation and prospects are all very unsettling, and that’s as someone who isn’t a Salmond supporter. In a way, I can actually understand why some people might want to go into denial, and blame dark forces out to discredit The Movement. I mean, I don’t for a moment condone that, but it isn’t an inexplicable reaction from someone who might have been intensely loyal to the man. We know enough to have seen what has happened in analogous circumstances.It's going to be vile