Intersectionalism is for career minded people who ain't integrated/deny integration. Heavy emphasis on the latter.
Here's my response:
Note the
Vibe Watchers in pink arm bands in the second safer spaces chart - who are taking part in the banner making or benefit night etc but also controlling the emotional atmosphere so no one is upset emotionally scarred. Presumably there will be a meeting with a progressive stack to determine who steps up and steps back in taking on these kinds of roles and in the meetings to determine who should or shouldn't be suitable for that role.
That's not tokenism or waffle - a Vibe Watcher would have helped out Ashok 'honky feminists' Kumar's problems at the feminist fightback party in Tower Hamlets.
The Vibe Watcher would have made the policy clear on who chooses the music in a non-offensive manner, having bits of your favourite genre called misogynistic is a big blow if you are an immigrant. But what intersection would they represent? - ideally a (working-class, lesbian or bisexual, intensively (British) colonized origins:[Bangladesh OK, Tibet not], with irregular immigration papers, medium colour to be equidistant between dark Asian and white (although what happens with use of skin colour-softening over the years) Asian woman to sort out all the issues and keep the space safe for all.
It was clearly not safe for this guy so much so that he had to insinuate to 1,200 others that these women were racists whilst calling them "honkey feminists", although today we see that it was - at heart - just a form of acceptable psychotherapy from his particular intersection.
there are about a million comments on this thread and there's no point going back and forth about the night's events cuz we'll prolly never agree. its cool that you all recognize the systemic racism in our political culture and want to do stuff about it, the point of the post was to: try to point out some of the racism i found in the white left, to highlight some of my thoughts from the night regarding generalizing about hip hop and misogyny but mostly, ill admit for me, it was using facebook as a form of psychotherapy, and it's refreshing to see so many down comments from my honkey comrades, let's end it at that
A problem given that this person uses public insinuations of racism as a form of psychotherapy is the mental disability intersection surely there should have been at least a partially mentally disabled Vibe Watcher?
I think broadly, these middle-class immigrants make it difficult for working-class immigrants to talk about class-based relations both in their origin and destination society.
Perhaps this is too presumptive, but middle-class immigrants nearly often set 'the immigrant agenda'. I don't know too much about all immigration but a bit on Turkish Kurdish Iranian Cypriot and just reading on the others.
To grossly generalise about this middle-class stamped and formed 'immigrant agenda', it is based around trying to prove to host society that the same (class) contours of society will be imposed upon the migrated society. And that affiliation or identification with overseas working-class people, your relatives back home - will only be in terms of sending them money.
So the agenda is equal representation in the structures of capitalist society: business, judges, parliaments and teaching staff. And to speed/smooth this passage positive action in the form of business grants, early promotion of black councillors to prospective MPs, black mentoring and pupillage schemes for the professions to be funded by the state or self-created.
Basically (better or worse) forms of affirmative action from the state, alongside building up social capital on a self-help basis - often in the long-term to help achieve those changes in affirmative action (more spending power in the immigrant business, better qualifications).
It's often there in the formal aswell as informal networks. The restaurant owners fund the Saturday schools, the philanthropic organisations asking the government for help to train up a new cadre of community liaison and youth work to cut down on estrangement or total separation, Gurdwara foundations, Chinese Associations, the overseas PNP and Congress branches of an earlier era, even the ostensibly progressive organisations the IWAs and Stalinoid cultural left.
(However much the rhetoric for back home Kurdistan, Tamil Eelam, Turkish M-L or Iranian M-Ls is guerilla action, for here it is strictly stagist, hence dominated by the culturally left middle-class immigrant layer)
It's not all bad - not all of the middle-class feminist agenda is bad: 50/50 boardrooms would eventually bring tangible improvements, grants for women to sort out their childcare whilst they work would be better than what we've got now, new laws against forced marriages are a sensible thing etc.
But we shouldn't let the middle-class immigrant account - 'immigrants have been held back from doing well because they are playing catch up to indigenous people' (note: the race will go on being run) - merge with justifiable indignation at the real instances of overt racism [employers straight away ignoring foreign names on CVs, the swearing at burqas, the night-time post-shift racial attacks, police profiling/swamping of black gang areas first, anti-Muslim newspaper headlines] alongside ongoing misunderstandings or misperceptions of different cultures (people seeing rap music as demeaning towards black women) etc to produce a hyper form of immigrant liberation, which this 'honky' business seems to be about.
This hyper anti-racism is the opposite of sober analysis of society's economic make-up. Let's be clear: the reason why 'unemployment amongst immigrants' is rising 'at a quicker rate than whites', why working-class immigrants aren't breaking through the glass ceiling etc is not increasing levels of racism imprinted on a coloniser 'pig' mindset etched into the British DNA for 500 years ever since Cabot left Bristol.
It is the results of capitalists tightening up their capitalist system with austerity and neoliberalism, working-class immigrants (alongside the rest of the w/c) experience the consequences.
Since the ratio of middle-class to working-class is lower for most immigrant groups this can be seen - on the surface - as tightening up of race war heading to the old days, sus is back, apartheid is returning. These things are inevitable police consequences of economic trends which can be fought effectively by economic power, combined working-class or independent trade union and community power - ie some form of united action.
They can be fought delusionally in terms of 'separate' black action overthrowing white power - leading to fear, mutual suspicion, clampdown and restriction for the immigrant working-class. Not blaming the French actions of 2005 and 2007 or the ones here in 2011 they are inevitable - wholly inevitable - given the society we have. I can only understand antagonising 'honkey feminists' as part of this delusional - almost fantasy struggle.
Race-based battles for funding or trading insults will never be to the advantage of immigrant working-class - these battles will fragment and split along new chauvinist lines (but the class dynamic will remain), even if the immigrant society becomes as 'successful' as the host society overall.