Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A thank you to Brexiteers.

You seem a little reluctant to say whether you actually think that yourself 😁

Since lexit supporters obviously wouldn't agree it makes no difference whether we're in the EU or not I think this little argument has proably reached a dead end though (hard to believe on this thread I know).
I'm not convinced by this at all. Some brexit/"lexit" supporters on here have been consistent in pointing out the similarity of the neoliberal attack on workers' rights whether they live in a supra state member state or not. AFAICS most of the "lexit" arguments appear to revolve around the potential offered for democratic socialist reforms, not that the withdrawal would immediately, in and of itself, result in any improvement in workers rights. So I really don't see why they wouldn't agree with the proposition that the neoliberal nature of the base affects and determines all workers.
 
I'm not convinced by this at all. Some brexit/"lexit" supporters on here have been consistent in pointing out the similarity of the neoliberal attack on workers' rights whether they live in a supra state member state or not. AFAICS most of the "lexit" arguments appear to revolve around the potential offered for democratic socialist reforms, not that the withdrawal would immediately, in and of itself, result in any improvement in workers rights. So I really don't see why they wouldn't agree with the proposition that the neoliberal nature of the base affects and determines all workers.
Well even in this paragraph you've already effectively conceded that it doesn't amount to the same. Only by reducing the whole debate to its most superficial and narrow form does your argument even begin to make any sense.

I don't know what the final sentence means but it sounds wrong.
 
of course the only benifit of brexit we decided is valid is the warm fuzzy feeling in the tum tum that brexit supporters feel
 
of course the only benifit of brexit we decided is valid is the warm fuzzy feeling in the tum tum that brexit supporters feel
I think for many brexiters the fuzzy feeling of 'sticking it to Johny Foreigner' is about six inches lower down than their tum tum...
 
I'd agree brexit represents an opportunity to attack workers rights in some particular ways, I would disagree that it's new or to a much increased degree yes.

From January 2023 - union lawyers presumably know what they are talking about:

"UNISON members and the union’s legal team are horrified at what the removal of these laws, and the principles of EU law, will mean for workers. Many legal improvements to workers’ rights in the UK, including UNISON’s recent Supreme Court victory that won new holiday rights for part-time workers, are reliant on the courts’ interpretations of EU law, and could be lost.

Without the shield of EU law, workers in the UK will be exposed to an Americanised, hire-and-fire culture that makes work more insecure and dangerous. The government’s decision to deliberately smash up decades of settled legal principles and case law will leave UK workers in an employment law wasteland.

Here are just five examples of the many workers’ protections that will disappear within a year, unless the government actively chooses to keep them...."

(they do still have a massive majority in parliament)
 
Last edited:
It's all over, "Brexit is dead. The only thing left to do is the political equivalent of disposing of the body", according to the telegraph.
Brexit is finally dead – and the Tory party will soon suffer the same…
article reckons there'll be another vote in 5-7 years and says its very sad but the UK might still rescue itself by finding other ways to 'incentivise entrepreneurs to cut costs' which was the point all along. :facepalm:
Close but no cigar.

Rejoiners might want to give serious thought to how they sell Euro and schegen membership
 
Close but no cigar.

Rejoiners might want to give serious thought to how they sell Euro and schegen membership
I don’t think another referendum’s coming anything like as soon as that article reckons. Wouldn’t be surprised if we get one on the death penalty first.
 

From January 2023 - union lawyers presumably know what they are talking about:

"UNISON members and the union’s legal team are horrified at what the removal of these laws, and the principles of EU law, will mean for workers. Many legal improvements to workers’ rights in the UK, including UNISON’s recent Supreme Court victory that won new holiday rights for part-time workers, are reliant on the courts’ interpretations of EU law, and could be lost.

Without the shield of EU law, workers in the UK will be exposed to an Americanised, hire-and-fire culture that makes work more insecure and dangerous. The government’s decision to deliberately smash up decades of settled legal principles and case law will leave UK workers in an employment law wasteland.

Here are just five examples of the many workers’ protections that will disappear within a year, unless the government actively chooses to keep them...."

(they do still have a massive majority in parliament)
I definitely wouldn't want to downplay the severity of what is (and will be) being attempted and didn't word my post well in that respect, especially as I was originally posting in agreement about attacks on workers right taking place. Undoubtedly many within the ruling class see an opportunity to roll back protections although the more radical wing seems to be on the back foot now and likely to lose out. I would still disagree on how to weigh it up in context with the sustained attacks on labour that have already taken place and are continuing, or with what was permitted already under EU rules but don't want to appear too nitpicking when I imagine we both largely agree on the substance of it and on the importance of the situation we're facing. The good thing is at least it has been met with an escalation from our side, and the nature of this bill is an illustration that it's not settled yet.
 
I definitely wouldn't want to downplay the severity of what is (and will be) being attempted and didn't word my post well in that respect, especially as I was originally posting in agreement about attacks on workers right taking place. Undoubtedly many within the ruling class see an opportunity to roll back protections although the more radical wing seems to be on the back foot now and likely to lose out. I would still disagree on how to weigh it up in context with the sustained attacks on labour that have already taken place and are continuing, or with what was permitted already under EU rules but don't want to appear too nitpicking when I imagine we both largely agree on the substance of it and on the importance of the situation we're facing. The good thing is at least it has been met with an escalation from our side, and the nature of this bill is an illustration that it's not settled yet.
yes broadly on the same page but i find it much easier to say that The Brexit Agenda that was actually on the powerbrokers table is one of deregulation and lowering of standards a la Britannia Unchained, and that to me clearly IS a more concentrated attack than what was happening up that point. The extent to which this is succeeding or failing is playing out right now and hard to judge yet. The Bonfire Bill will be a massive moment in that fight.
 
yes broadly on the same page but i find it much easier to say that The Brexit Agenda that was actually on the powerbrokers table is one of deregulation and lowering of standards a la Britannia Unchained, and that to me clearly IS a more concentrated attack than what was happening up that point. The extent to which this is succeeding or failing is playing out right now and hard to judge yet. The Bonfire Bill will be a massive moment in that fight.
I'm not too familiar with the various factions of the Conservative Party I've got to admit so can't offer too much of an argument either way. And I'm also not exactly sure what you mean by the powerbrokers table - do you mean the withdrawal agreement itself or the governments overseeing it (or something else)?

So speaking a bit generally and possibly from the wrong end of the stick I'm not sure it's been as coherent as that. For instance how does the immediate successor government to Cameron's under Theresa May fit into this picture? Initially at least she seemed to be setting out a different stall certainly compared with the Britannia Unchained (Trussite?) group, I vaguely remember her getting praise from the liberal press. I think that and the deadlock of May's tenure and then followed by Johnson and the complications added by both the shifting ground from the 2017 GE to the 2019 one and his disinclination to constrain his room for the kind of freewheeling maneuver he obviously enjoys shows an extremely muddled situation and I'm not sure there has really been at any point a clear and decisive driving force behind the process. Exactly what the balance of forces in the Conservative Party is now I'm not sure, but I'd think the group most closely aligned with Britannia Unchained would be those around Truss and Kwarteng which looking it up seems to be the Free Market Forum and they've suffered a humiliating defeat. That's not to say their agenda can't still be advanced of course.

The opportunity the chronic instability within the Conservatives presents has taken a long time for either the unions or the Labour Party to take advantage of but it's starting to happen to varying degrees and that adds another very uncertain element to the mix in terms of how things play out.
 
I'm not too familiar with the various factions of the Conservative Party I've got to admit so can't offer too much of an argument either way. And I'm also not exactly sure what you mean by the powerbrokers table - do you mean the withdrawal agreement itself or the governments overseeing it (or something else)?

So speaking a bit generally and possibly from the wrong end of the stick I'm not sure it's been as coherent as that. For instance how does the immediate successor government to Cameron's under Theresa May fit into this picture? Initially at least she seemed to be setting out a different stall certainly compared with the Britannia Unchained (Trussite?) group, I vaguely remember her getting praise from the liberal press. I think that and the deadlock of May's tenure and then followed by Johnson and the complications added by both the shifting ground from the 2017 GE to the 2019 one and his disinclination to constrain his room for the kind of freewheeling maneuver he obviously enjoys shows an extremely muddled situation and I'm not sure there has really been at any point a clear and decisive driving force behind the process. Exactly what the balance of forces in the Conservative Party is now I'm not sure, but I'd think the group most closely aligned with Britannia Unchained would be those around Truss and Kwarteng which looking it up seems to be the Free Market Forum and they've suffered a humiliating defeat. That's not to say their agenda can't still be advanced of course.

The opportunity the chronic instability within the Conservatives presents has taken a long time for either the unions or the Labour Party to take advantage of but it's starting to happen to varying degrees and that adds another very uncertain element to the mix in terms of how things play out.
yes its true there isn't a unified conservative position - boris two articles johnson is the living embodiment of that, however its clearer than it first seems i think. IMO the options are:

1. there are open probusiness remainers

2. there are those who acknowledge the result and were looking for a 'soft' brexit that basically maintained a customs union and staying within as much of the trade framework as possible

3. there are those real brexiteers who see #2 a Brexit In Name Only , who resist any attempt to remain within EU standards and rules - whats the point of leaving if you do that? Thats actually sound logic, if you're going to do #2 might as well not leave at all and have influnece 'at the table' rather than be a 'rule taker'.

So really there's only permutations of #3, a pure Brexit position, everything else is damage limitation. Bimble posted that Telegraph opinion piece today about the death of brexit, that to me is suggesting the death of #3 and a retreat to #2. I'm not sure thats the case.... #3 will never truly die, without rejoining there will always be those who if they can get in power will try and "diverge" from EU standards and rules. As I say, I think the Bonfire Bill is a real test of where Sunak is at on all this, he likely has the parliamentary majority to follow it through if he so wishes
 
yes its true there isn't a unified conservative position - boris two articles johnson is the living embodiment of that, however its clearer than it first seems i think. IMO the options are:

1. there are open probusiness remainers

2. there are those who acknowledge the result and were looking for a 'soft' brexit that basically maintained a customs union and staying within as much of the trade framework as possible

3. there are those real brexiteers who see #2 a Brexit In Name Only , who resist any attempt to remain within EU standards and rules - whats the point of leaving if you do that? Thats actually sound logic, if you're going to do #2 might as well not leave at all and have influnece 'at the table' rather than be a 'rule taker'.

So really there's only permutations of #3, a pure Brexit position, everything else is damage limitation. Bimble posted that Telegraph opinion piece today about the death of brexit, that to me is suggesting the death of #3 and a retreat to #2. I'm not sure thats the case.... #3 will never truly die, without rejoining there will always be those who if they can get in power will try and "diverge" from EU standards and rules. As I say, I think the Bonfire Bill is a real test of where Sunak is at on all this, he likely has the parliamentary majority to follow it through if he so wishes
This seems like a pretty reasonable summary to me, although a big question would be what the composition around those positions looks like. In the third case you could approach that both from the slash and burn IEA direction or from what you could maybe call a more conservative nationalist UKIP-ish direction (I don't think that's quite an accurate description of the divide but you know what I mean).

Yes I think the difficulty for the second option is while it would probably enjoy a substantial support from powerful business organisations/lobby groups and I haven't read the Telegraph piece but it seems plausible there's some considerable movement towards this given the general state of economic stagnation, despite that it's very challenging to swing politically in the corner the Conservatives now occupy.

Which does leave them stuck around #3, which is both 'real brexit' and at the same time not the brexit people voted for, and you'd have to think that's going to politically poisonous. Has been already for that matter.

By coincidence I've just got to the chapter that I think will discuss Brexit in Adam Tooze's really excellent book Crashed about the financial and other crises from 2007 onwards, might shed some light relevant to the tendencies in the Conservative Party. Highly recommend the book for anyone interested in the EU or recent political developments generally, he's a great writer.
 
It's all over, "Brexit is dead. The only thing left to do is the political equivalent of disposing of the body", according to the telegraph.
Brexit is finally dead – and the Tory party will soon suffer the same…
article reckons there'll be another vote in 5-7 years and says its very sad but the UK might still rescue itself by finding other ways to 'incentivise entrepreneurs to cut costs' which was the point all along. :facepalm:
I can't see us rejoining on that sort of timescale, the UK and especially it's ruling political elite is going to have to eat far too much humble pie for it to be palatable. 15-20 years maybe.
 
Well even in this paragraph you've already effectively conceded that it doesn't amount to the same. Only by reducing the whole debate to its most superficial and narrow form does your argument even begin to make any sense.

I don't know what the final sentence means but it sounds wrong.
It's the brex/lexit supporters on here that seem keen to point out that attacks on workers' rights are similar whether in or outside the EU, not just me.
 
Why actually did the EU do things like the working time directive maternity & mandatory sick pay laws etc ?
Was it to ‘level the playing field’ so that no member state could (legally) have sweatshops and so massively undercut the cost of producing widgets in other member states or was it something else. ?


ETA lol. The UK was the only member who voted against it, the cap on working hours, thirty years ago, and got overruled.
0CF02F1D-385E-4B37-80F1-8145227A96C3.jpeg
 
Last edited:
It's the brex/lexit supporters on here that seem keen to point out that attacks on workers' rights are similar whether in or outside the EU, not just me.
It's not a very big surprise left wing leave voters would point out anti labour politics of the EU, this clearly doesn't equal thinking it makes no difference either way which if you remember was what you claimed to begin with, maybe you're no longer arguing that to be honest I'm not sure what you're arguing at this point... And since neither of us are lexiters I don't know why you're so determined to hide behind what they think.
 
It's not a very big surprise left wing leave voters would point out anti labour politics of the EU, this clearly doesn't equal thinking it makes no difference either way which if you remember was what you claimed to begin with, maybe you're no longer arguing that to be honest I'm not sure what you're arguing at this point... And since neither of us are lexiters I don't know why you're so determined to hide behind what they think.
I really don't think I have hidden my views or hidden behind those of others. I appreciate that you don't agree with or see any value in my analysis that brexit is essentially a meaningless distraction from the real battle of forces in neoliberalism. I've consistently argued that what was presented to the UK electorate in 2016 was merely a choice between 2 alternative visions of how to progress the neoliberal agenda. That some on 'the left' saw one of those alternatives as a means to achieving socialism in one country has constantly interested me.
 
I really don't think I have hidden my views or hidden behind those of others. I appreciate that you don't agree with or see any value in my analysis that brexit is essentially a meaningless distraction from the real battle of forces in neoliberalism. I've consistently argued that what was presented to the UK electorate in 2016 was merely a choice between 2 alternative visions of how to progress the neoliberal agenda. That some on 'the left' saw one of those alternatives as a means to achieving socialism in one country has constantly interested me.

You've made over 700 posts on this thread. That's a lot for someone who thinks that the debate is
essentially a meaningless distraction from the real battle of forces

I don't know anyone, and I was actively involved in the LeFT campaign, who thought what you claim in this unfortunate turn of phrase:

That some on 'the left' saw one of those alternatives as a means to achieving socialism in one country has constantly interested me.

Our position was, and remains, that freed from the shackles of the decrepit EU economic project and its anti-democratic structures the possibility opens up for a step away from the direction of economic travel of the last 40 years. Specifically the form that would take would be the prioritization of the national economy, state aid led investment in infrastructure and public services, greater coverage of collective bargaining, an expansion of the union rate for the job and an end to use of free movement of labour to drive down wages and hamper unions and an end to outsourcing and new procurement rules that strengthen the national economy. A tiny step toward social democracy at best if you want to label it.

Next year we could well see a Labour Government under pressure from the organized working class to do just that. For the avoidance of having to respond to the dim we did not think this would happen under a Tory Government so best not to reply along the lines of 'well, how's that going eh eh', 'it's a fantasy', 'they are in bed with Sunak/Farage' etc etc.
 
Last edited:
If you think it's going to happen under the likes of a Starmer government, you too are indulging in fantasy. Starmer and the power behind the throne Mandleson are all about preserving the neoliberal status quo.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom