Most remainer arguments I’m seeing are:
1. based on a misunderstanding of what Europe is and what the EU is and the obvious difference (“I don’t want to leave Europe”, “we are Europeans” etc)
2. cobbled together 1990’s style TUC analysis of the benefits of ‘a social Europe’ - which the troika of the ECB, IMF and EC has long condemned to the dustbin of political economy
3. bourgeois offence about things like the right to be a student in France - when for working class kids even going to university in their home city appears a distant dream
4.frankly bizarre arguments over immediate transitional government problems/issues. Bizarre because leaving a political construct that we’ve been embedded in for over half a century has actually gone remarkably smoothly. As you say, anger about paperwork.
My frustration with the entire debate is, essentially, that there is no remainer argument of any substance to engage with. Like you,
kebabking, most sensible remainers have accepted the result and moved on. Even third way neo-liberals like Starmer and Sturgeon have either forgotten their previous apocalyptic warnings or dialled them right down.
There are no serious and well constructed arguments for what a reformed EU might look like being written. There is no substance, nothing to really engage with.
Instead what’s left, and there is no getting around it, is the tin foil hat wing...as these threads on U75 increasingly demonstrate.