8den
No I'm pretty sure that was 8ball...
Jazzz said:Just disproving that I am an 'idiot'.
could be fun, too.
Jazzz you could be outwitted in a game of snakes and ladders
"The way the snake falls clearly means I fall on 37 not 4."
Jazzz said:Just disproving that I am an 'idiot'.
could be fun, too.
Whether someone is any good or not at mind (ahem) "sports" is breathtakingly irrelevant to the thread.Jazzz said:sorry to disappoint you laptop et al but the games challenge was in response to the 'idiot' jibe. Do you contend that idiots can reliably beat the intellectually superior at mind sports?
Jazzz said:I challenge you to a game of chess, scrabble or backgammon, your choice, we'll see who wins.
How on earth can a ratio be less than a strength. The ratio is dimensionless.Jazzz said:He did not, and I'll back myself to the hilt on this one MikeMcc. It's TA that doesn't understand what the DCR was. If he was right, how on earth can the safety factor be less than the specified steel strength?
Jazzz said:No they're not. They're widows trying to find out the truth about what happened. And finding that they can't get very basic answers to very simple stuff. Here's what they say about 'conspiracy theorists' - I note you've never commented on this quote:
"At first, we widows didn’t want to be seen with conspiracy people. But they kept showing up. They cared more than those supposedly doing the investigating. If you ask me, they’re just Americans, looking for the truth, which is supposed to be our right." Van Auken
You should watch their documentary BK. Here it is:
... and you would see that they ringingly endorse the work by Paul Thompson and his 9/11 Timeline. Funny thing when I quoted that a few pages ago editor rounded on me for quoting a 'conspiracy site'. And well, if you watch the film you would see that it addresses the defence failures on 9/11, suggests that the US military deliberately let Osama and his henchmen escape, in fact was protected by them when he needed kidney dialysis, that they helped create Al-Qaeda via funds transferred through the Pakistani ISI.. what else.. oh that WTC7 seemed a very strange and implausible collapse - much else that were I to post it, you would be barking 'conspiraloon'.
You should also read the questions that they posed to the 9/11 Commission, ones that went unanswered. Questions concerning Bush's conduct on the day. Questions asking about DNA identification of the hijackers. Questions about how on earth NORAD failed to intercept any of the four flights. Questions asking how passports can survive infernos. Questions about how the hijackers managed to get the visas.
In other words exactly the same questions that the 'conspiracy theorists' have been asking.
Yep, finally you recognise that you are on the same side as the conspiracy theorists with you and 7/7. But I don't hold out much hope for your success. The Jersey Girls are made from different stuff entirely. While they are simply demanding that the USG comes up with proper explanations for everything that happened you seem to be incredibly concerned with conspiracy-theorist bashing, am unfortunate trait picked up from urban75. Do you think they would be fobbed off with a reply like 'we don't have any proper footage on CCTV because it would upset grieving relatives?' would they hell. They haven't got to the bottom of 9/11 for sure yet but they forced the 9/11 Commission to happen at all and made Bush, Henry Kissenger, Paul Zelikow squirm.
Can I imagine you making Blair squirm? I don't think so.
What?!!! What sick demented cunt said that? URL, please!Badger Kitten said:.... that the bus at Tavistock Square was full of ''actors and stuntmen''...
Originally Posted by Badger Kitten
.... that the bus at Tavistock Square was full of ''actors and stuntmen''...
editor said:What?!!! What sick demented cunt said that? URL, please!
When considering the notion of the exploding bus being a product of Peter Power's crisis management exercise, it is crucial to remember that prior knowledge of these exercises is kept to a minimum - a strictly need-to-know basis - to ensure that the emergency services and the individuals involved react naturally and 'treat it as real as possible'.
If you don't inform the emergency services, you certainly don't inform members of the general public either and, as no-one would tolerate the random exploding of innocent civilians as part of routine crisis management exercises that take place all the time, these exercises employ clever pyrotechnics, stuntmen, and actors ('players' as Peter Power refers to them) to portray the parts of the 'civilians' and 'victims' involved in the crisis to be managed - just like in the movies where lots of things go bang all the time leaving lots of apparently horrific walking wounded, dead people and body parts in the aftermath.
This is precisely how you blow the roof clean off a diverted double-decker bus and leave a bundle of people standing on the top deck looking otherwise unharmed because, being hired hands, they knew the roof was going to be lifted off, with the back of the bus being the source of the energy required to do so. The Antagonist has no access to the remnants of the bus to determine whether the bus curiously diverted to Tavistock Square had been otherwise tampered with to create the devastating appearance and leave a top deck full of survivors but this must also be considered as a factor in the staging of a realistic 1,000 man crisis simulation exercise...
.If The Antagonist's observations are correct and the Number 30 bus full of stuntmen and actors was diverted as part of Peter Power's 1,000 man crisis management exercise in Central London into Tavistock Square and 'exploded' in front of the offices of Fortress GB, then we are left only with the simultaneous 'exploding' trains to explain which MetroNet and the media attributed for some time on the day to a power surge. This is a perfectly normal and rational explanation for what occurred, supports the survivor accounts perfectly and yet this story has somehow become an incredulous conspiracy that is beyond the realms of comprehension
Well I wonder if you were watching the same documentary I was, because I just started watching it again. And it takes half an hour in before the intelligence failures are even mentioned, by which time it's addressed NORAD's failure to defend the skies on the day, Bush's conduct, the lack of concern over the three unprecedented and unusual collapses and the apparation corruption and stonewalling of investigations. All stuff that people have been decrying me for asking, and moreover demanding that if I'm just 'asking questions' I had better come up with an alternative theory.Badger Kitten said:oh fuck off. Just fuck off.
I wasted some of my life watching Press for Truth, and the fact that the Jersey Girls know -as the BBC pointed out too - that the US Govt has been less than open about the failures to act on intelligence before 9/11, doesn't mean that they hold any truck at all with the bullshit batshit about the USG being behind 9/11.
You've got this all the wrong way around. Instead of trying to draw your line between the 'acceptable' conspiracy theories and the 'conspiraloon' - bending it however you see necessary to make sure that the Jersey Girls are on your side, you should be saying - it's up to the USG to prove its story on what happened on 9/11. That's what the Jersey Girls are doing. The Jersey girls have aligned themselves squarely with those asking the questions and refusing to accept the official accounts until they have been proven. That means dotting all the i's and crossing the t's. That means asking questions about why NORAD failed to intercept any of the four flights. It means asking questions about why Bush talked to a bunch of schoolkids when secret service agents should have been hustling him bodily out to a safe location. It means asking about DNA identification of the hijackers. etc etc.Some conspiracy theorists have asked the same questions as the Jersey Girls, but then the conspiraloons go on and on and on and make up a load more questions which are based on stupidity and paranoia. As conspiraloons ask millions of questions it is not surprising that some of them are sensible or reasonable. There is a difference between asking questions, and asking questions then refusing to listen to the answers and instead peddling crap based on a paranoid belief system.
I have not misrepresent the Jersey Girls. They do not accept the finding of the 9/11 Commission. They want 'truth' whatever that may be. They don't believe they have it.Please so not make ''asking some of the same questions as some conspiracy theorists' about intel failures and response on the day'' conflate with
'' supporting the conspiraloons theories that the Goverment planned and ordered the attacks.''
Because that would be a lie.
The Jersey Girls are PART of the 9/11 Truth Movement and certainly 'tolerate' conspiracy theorists because, unlike you, they haven't made it their priority to attack their fellow citizens who are also asking questions. You've decided to make a massive deal out of some erroneous CT and launch offensives with all your might (I seem to remember you remarking that it was for your entertainment). You went on to their territory, their forums with all your vitriol. And so if some of the more paranoid of the CTs think that you are somehow trying to disrupt them, and have given you stuff back as a result, well you were.The Jersey Girls in one quote seem to be more tolerant of conspiraloons hanging onto their sensible cause to get answers and trying to subvert it than I am, but perhaps they haven't had the same level as hate mail as me, or been libelled on stupid websites, perhaps they haven't had sick letters sent to their father, and antisemitic DVDS sent to their flat, like I have. The Jersey Girls' tolerance seems to me to have been grotesquely abused by the attempts of loons to use them to give credibility to their conspracy theories.
And fuck off because I am not on the same side as the conspiraloons ghoulishly picking over 7/7 and finding mistakes and loose threads in a rolling, multi-sourced media staory and ongoing police investigation, because they too start from the basis of a lie, that the UK Govt was complicit in 7/7. That the bombers were ''innocent''. That there was a ''power surge, not bombs'', or that ''the bombs were under the trains'', that the bus at Tavistock Square was full of ''actors and stuntmen'', and ''pyrotechnics'', ugh.
As to the CCTV, there have been requests to release it by survivors, partly to shut up the sick conspiraloons. The coroner, who has not yet made his report, is looking at whether to release some of it before the report into the deaths of the victims and the bombers.
I have pushed back against for months against sick conspiraloon shit, once I found my account being twisted and lies about me being published all over the internet, and found myself at the centre of some particularly offensive conspiracy theories. And I've been insulted and had harassment for speaking out against it.
And the only reason I bother is because I am campaigning for an inquiry, and I do not want the sane, clear eyed campaign for a 7/7 inquiry to be infected with the anti semitic drivel, the paranoid delusions and the laughable, tasteless muderer-exoneration of the 7/7 conspiraloons. They do people who were involved a huge disservice by muddying the waters with their pathetic fantasies. They make it easier to dismiss it. And that is not fair.And so I will fight back, tiresome though it is, because yes, I do tyake personal attacks personally, and I hate seeing something I beleive in twisted by freaks.
And I've been in a room of people - survivors - making Tessa Jowell and John Reid squirm, twice, and you can hold your horses until Crevice ends and see what happens then in terms of continuing media pressure for an inquiry.
And you can finally fuck off, as I said and carry on having your arse whipped publicly on this thread, to general hilarity.
Ta
Pete the Greek said:Is it just me who's getting sick to the back teeth of Jazz's endless cut 'n' pastes?
TheArchitect said:No, it's his lies and misrepresentations which I get sick of.
Jazzz said:And I'm sorry but I've not had my 'arse whipped' on the this thread at all. Quite the reverse. Everyone thought that TheArchitect would have my number but found that he didn't at all. Sorry to disappoint.