Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

17 year old private school student cleared of friend's murder

Sure. Just for me that requires believing a self-confessed liar hasn’t colluded with his mate the killer in order to get his mate off. Like he got his first story wrong and his mate has gone “No, say this happened stupid”.
Yep, but if both living lads present are saying it was self defence and in the absence of any other evidence, it's hard to see how the jury can convict Boy A of murder or manslaughter.
 
The MEN reporting from the trial gives a lot of background. Boy two offered no evidence. Seems to be significant emphasis on their youth by the def. Boy one pulled a knife at a party after hitting someone the previous year. Wouldn't be suprised to hear from these two again..
 
That would be a weird one.

But if the idiots were carrying a flick knives failed to steal less than £50 of dope could see it ending in a stupid fight.
 
Yep, but if both living lads present are saying it was self defence and in the absence of any other evidence, it's hard to see how the jury can convict Boy A of murder or manslaughter.

Precisely. The reporting is shocking, but from what it’s possible to put together both pulled blades and given the apparent testimony of the third member of the posh bluds there were no other options for the jury.

But given the immense privilege of those involved I can’t help but think the somewhat oblique reporting of matters is designed to give the two a clean slate. Lessons learned by the lads etc. Put another way, I can’t imagine a similar presentation of events if it was three working class mancs
 
Last edited:
Precisely. The reporting is shocking, but from what it’s possible to put together both pulled blades and given the apparent testimony of the third member of the posh bluds there were no other options for the jury.

But given the immense privilege of all three of them I can’t help but think the somewhat oblique reporting of matters is designed to give the two a clean slate. Lessons learned by the lads etc. Put another way, I can’t imagine a similar presentation of events if it was three working class mancs

Both pulled blades but they never managed to find the one belonging to Yousef Makki...
 
Petition closed down after 8200 signatures.

I saw at least one person naming Boy one in the comments so he'll probably be getting a knock at the door and end up with a worse sentence than either of the accused.

Oddly when I googled his name the original story from March comes up as 5th result.
 
Last edited:
Both pulled blades but they never managed to find the one belonging to Yousef Makki...

Yes, but a jury can only return the verdict it did with the evidence before it. They can't speculate or presume there was no knife without any evidence to back it up.
 

Boy A & Boy B aren't 'white' - this is primarily about the power & leverage of money & its connections, not ethnicity. And to some extent about a legal system that allows the middle classes to be self-punishing, haunted by their own (christian) consciences, moved towards rehabilitation through their own economic potential, while insisting that poorer people(s) need their conscience & punishment externalising.
 
Have their identities been published? I've not seen anything. Do you have a link you can share?

I don't think I can without courting trouble - they're both minors. The MEN posted their names yesterday by accident - they were redacted swiftly, but matched the names that many in the area knew anyway - they're from two big, well-known south Manchester schools with thousands of pupils, consequently the story has been common & social media currency since Day One.
 
Boy 1 is very much what I would call 'white' from his appearance. Boy 2 has what I would think of as an Asian name.

Its not hard to find their names on Twitter. Tweets about the business owned by Boy 1's mum and someone has even posted a picture from the evening news that named them both by surname in the photo caption.... doesn't appear to have been doctored.
 
Judges summing up was a bit Jeremy Thorpe. 'It is for you to decide whether the character witness description of a sweet, lovely and engaging boy helps the defendant and that this may make him very intelligent.'

Yeah. Up to you to decide.
 
Boy 1 is very much what I would call 'white' from his appearance. Boy 2 has what I would think of as an Asian name.

Its not hard to find their names on Twitter. Tweets about the business owned by Boy 1's mum and someone has even posted a picture from the evening news that named them both by surname in the photo caption.... doesn't appear to have been doctored.

It's a Central European name, & as far as I know, Jewish. My point was that Powell has the wrong line - this case is emblematic of class leverage more than ethnicity.
 
I don't think I can without courting trouble - they're both minors. The MEN posted their names yesterday by accident - they were redacted swiftly, but matched the names that many in the area knew anyway - they're from two big, well-known south Manchester schools with thousands of pupils, consequently the story has been common & social media currency since Day One.

I thought they were from private schools, surely they wouldn't be that big?
 
I thought they were from private schools, surely they wouldn't be that big?

A quick google says 1,400 odd in each - big enough, plus a shocking contextual story to generate interest, & social media to spread it. I have no connection to the story but heard all about it very quickly, & going on the court case, surprisingly accurately just from idle chit chat.
 
It's a Central European name, & as far as I know, Jewish. My point was that Powell has the wrong line - this case is emblematic of class leverage more than ethnicity.

As and Bs and 1s and 2s getting confused maybe. Boy 1 was accused of murder and as far as I'm aware is the one with a Hungarian Jewish name.

Completely agree on your other point, as I said, if it was one of the others dead in Gorton I suspect the outcome of this would be very different.
 
As and Bs and 1s and 2s getting confused maybe. Boy 1 was accused of murder and as far as I'm aware is the one with a Hungarian Jewish name.

Completely agree on your other point, as I said, if it was one of the others dead in Gorton I suspect the outcome of this would be very different.

You're right, yes - I confused the court pseudonyms, apologies.

And yep, the meat of it - potential charges of murder, joint enterprise, conspiracy to rob all shrugged off because of a top QC & contextually adequate references/credentials. Compare this to the cps & police enthusiasm for joint enterprise charges (& guilty verdicts) round the Hafidah murder in Moss Side a couple of years back. It's straightforwardly unjust.
 
Boy A & Boy B aren't 'white' - this is primarily about the power & leverage of money & its connections, not ethnicity. And to some extent about a legal system that allows the middle classes to be self-punishing, haunted by their own (christian) consciences, moved towards rehabilitation through their own economic potential, while insisting that poorer people(s) need their conscience & punishment externalising.

Thats a brilliant way of putting it. Very insightful.
 
Compare this to the cps & police enthusiasm for joint enterprise charges (& guilty verdicts) round the Hafidah murder in Moss Side a couple of years back. It's straightforwardly unjust.

Yea a friend was using the same comparison the other day.
 
Hang on they were also found not guilty of conspiracy to commit robbery when they had gone to rob someone. Okay it does say allegedly in the report but it seems to have been a main feature to explain what they doing with the knives at that point.

Something seems seriously fucked up about this. Did the prosecution mess up? Did the police mess up?

It is fucked up. I live 10 miles ish up the road. If that had been lads round here, there would have been no bail. And they both would be done under the joint enterprise laws.

It's a class thing, these boys get to be judged by their potential which if anything gives them even less of an excuse.
 
Yes, but a jury can only return the verdict it did with the evidence before it. They can't speculate or presume there was no knife without any evidence to back it up.

There is no evidence to say Makki had a knife. Only Boy As word and a changed statement of boy B who admitted lying in his earlier statement. And then refused to give evidence.

You can’t prove a negative and you certainly can’t do it when the boy who was said to have a knife is not there to defend himself because he’s dead.
 
Back
Top Bottom