butchersapron
Bring back hanging
As is this woman from the labour party/LRC. She is a genuine non-messing posadist as well.This bloke is now calling for LU to support ISIS' caliphate.
As is this woman from the labour party/LRC. She is a genuine non-messing posadist as well.This bloke is now calling for LU to support ISIS' caliphate.
As is this woman from the labour party/LRC. She is a genuine non-messing posadist as well.
I thing she is the lone Posadist in Britain now. In fairness, she doesn't actually argue in support of ISIS there, although she argues for not supporting the Kurds in Kobane (but on the grounds that Assad is some kind of secular anti-imperialist). It's a wrong position, but it's not the same as supporting a caliphate.As is this woman from the labour party/LRC. She is a genuine non-messing posadist as well.
Yeah it is. And she in the same group as you. Not the labour party, the LRC.I thing she is the lone Posadist in Britain now. In fairness, she doesn't actually argue in support of ISIS there, although she argues for not supporting the Kurds in Kobane (but on the grounds that Assad is some kind of secular anti-imperialist). It's a wrong position, but it's not the same as supporting a caliphate.
Not really. The LRC has a mad fringe sectarian element in it, which does it no favours. But she isn't supporting ISIS or their ideas, however wrong she might be on the situation in general.Yeah it is. And she in the same group as you. Not the labour party, the LRC.
That post isn't as bad as Socialist Fight's defence of the Woolwich Axe killers, who were apparently making an anti-imperialist gesture.Not really. The LRC has a mad fringe sectarian element in it, which does it no favours. But she isn't supporting ISIS or their ideas, however wrong she might be on the situation in general.
No she is, like she supported the Russian fascists.Not really. The LRC has a mad fringe sectarian element in it, which does it no favours. But she isn't supporting ISIS or their ideas, however wrong she might be on the situation in general.
It's the same.That post isn't as bad as Socialist Fight's defence of the Woolwich Axe killers, who were apparently making an anti-imperialist gesture.
Not quite - she is not saying ISIS are anti-imperialists. She is saying that imperialists back the Kurds, who are fighting Assad, who resists the ambitions of imperialism. She isn't saying anything directly about ISIS, except that the Kurds shouldn't be armed to fight them.It's the same.
She's saying support ISIS you goon. Someone in your little group.Not quite - she is not saying ISIS are anti-imperialists. She is saying that imperialists back the Kurds, who are fighting Assad, who resists the ambitions of imperialism. She isn't saying anything directly about ISIS, except that the Kurds shouldn't be armed to fight them.
Yeah she is. I see why you can't admit it though.No, she isn't (however much I disagree with what she IS saying). She's not the front of the queue as far as expulsions are concerned!
She just isn't saying that *here*, although I can believe she's daft enough to (and she's not her on own sadly).Yeah she is. I see why you can't admit it though.
She's saying it out load and proud and as a part of your group.The one you elect to be a member of, Yet there are even worse oddballs that you think you have to deal with before reaching this one.She just isn't saying that *here*, although I can believe she's daft enough to (and she's not her on own sadly).
where is she saying "support ISIS"? Can you provide a quote to that effect? You don't have to try hard to point to the limits of the LRC, so I don't see why you are making shit up.She's saying it out load and proud and as a part of your group.The one you elect to be a member of, Yet there are even worse oddballs that you think you have to deal with before reaching this one.
Seriously, you can type loads of shit on RMT members wages whilst sitting in parliament and you can't read a text from a fucking goon right?where is she saying "support ISIS"? Can you provide a quote to that effect? You don't have to try hard to point to the limits of the LRC, so I don't see why you are making shit up.
I am not sitting in Parliament, and I can read very well thankyou.Seriously, you can type loads of shit on RMT members wages whilst sitting in parliament and you can't read a text from a fucking goon right?
This person isn't even the nuttiest in your group?No, she isn't (however much I disagree with what she IS saying). She's not the front of the queue as far as expulsions are concerned!
depends how you measure it, but not necessarilyThis person isn't even the nuttiest in your group?
Join labour and then the LRC. You're the nuttiest right?depends how you measure it, but not necessarily
Serious question - why haven't the labour leadership done a Kinnock with the posadists etc and expelled them? Is it because most people don't know about them because they are so irrelevant and therefore the lp can't be arsed, or do they not know of their existence? Or perhaps it's because expelling them would just cause more embarrassment as more people became aware of their existence?
Hence LRC.The Labour Party expels groups if they are seen as a threat or as disruptive or if they provide a useful target for some reason. They don't expel non threatening fruit loops.
If she was a Muslim in a hijab she would be.No, she isn't (however much I disagree with what she IS saying). She's not the front of the queue as far as expulsions are concerned!
You have no power to expel anyone. Note in this case you decide to say we rather than they.There's an understandable aversion to expelling people on the basis of their particular interepretation of socialist ideas. We aren't a Leninist section with a single line. For the most part the wackier fringe has been harmless enough.
There's an understandable aversion to expelling people on the basis of their particular interepretation of socialist ideas. We aren't a Leninist section with a single line. For the most part the wackier fringe has been harmless enough.
The Labour Party expels groups if they are seen as a threat or as disruptive or if they provide a useful target for some reason. They don't expel non threatening fruit loops. Like the Posadists or Socialist Appeal.