Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Wonderwall - opinions

How good is the song 'Wonderwall'?

  • Excellent

    Votes: 17 18.5%
  • Good

    Votes: 15 16.3%
  • Average

    Votes: 18 19.6%
  • Bad

    Votes: 12 13.0%
  • Total shite

    Votes: 30 32.6%

  • Total voters
    92
anyway, i don't wish anything bad on oasis as long as they continue to not make any records. they all seem like decent fellows, it's just a shame about the music.

blur should be fucking tarred and feathered.
 
no it wasn't.

alan mcghee didn't sign oasis and then nothing happened and then oasis sold a million trillion records and were at downing street. a lot of other wealthy middle class coke addled wankers had to decide to invest time and money on oasis on the principal that there would be a good return.
alan mcghee did sign oasis.
 
neither blur nor oasis would have made the bus fair home if some wealthy middle class coke addled tory in the home counties hadn't seen a way of marketing them.
You couldn't be more wrong, there. Oasis were on an independent record label, run by a Scot who worked for and donated to Labour.
 
anyone who pulls that smile over a table of cheese like that is a cunt tbh.

Cheese Twat said:
“Trees belong to the class of things that cost as much as you’re prepared to spend, like pianos."

Cheese Twat said:
“I was surprised how much I liked most of the people who lived nearby. Not just the nobs and the billionaires. We took on two Gypsies from the trailer park as cleaners and they fascinated me. The younger one was very pretty …”
 
You couldn't be more wrong, there. Oasis were on an independent record label, run by a Scot who worked for and donated to Labour.

i'll say it again... alan mcghee didn't sign oasis and then nothing happened and then oasis sold a million trillion records and were at downing street. a lot of other wealthy middle class coke addled wankers had to decide to invest time and money on oasis on the principal that there would be a good return.
 
i'll say it again... alan mcghee didn't sign oasis and then nothing happened and then oasis sold a million trillion records and were at downing street. a lot of other wealthy middle class coke addled wankers had to decide to invest time and money on oasis on the principal that there would be a good return.
Sorry, I didn't realise I was a page behind and this had already been mentioned.

Oasis were selling shitloads of records before the stuff you mention, though. They might have reached the heights they did because of that 'investment', but to say they would have done nothing without them is categorically wrong.
 
How come they're always called independent, then, if they're owned by one of the 'big 4'?
Because they were set up as independent and as that term came to mean less and less it just stuck to creation. Mcgee had already done the same trick with the JAMC in the 80s after having signed them to creation then onto the independent Blanco y Negro - which was just WEA in disguise, they passed as independent too.
 
Because they were set up as independent and as that term came to mean less and less it just stuck to creation. Mcgee had already done the same trick with the JAMC in the 80s after having signed them to creation then onto the independent Blanco y Negro - which was just WEA in disguise, they passed as independent too.
They used to independent but McGee sold to Sony after Primal Scream's success. They were owned by Sony when Oasis were signed.
Fair enough. I've been conned.
 
i'll say it again... alan mcghee didn't sign oasis and then nothing happened and then oasis sold a million trillion records and were at downing street. a lot of other wealthy middle class coke addled wankers had to decide to invest time and money on oasis on the principal that there would be a good return.
I'm intrigued who you're referring to now.

I'd have thought creation had the money via sony already to launch Oasis without needing to go out for more funding, unless you're referring to tours etc. Might be wrong though.
 
Back
Top Bottom