Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the lib-dems are shit

Scum, sub-human scum:

clegg-leaflet-doesnt-mention-clegg.jpg


I'm sure Mark Steel is very happy about this.
 
wow. Surely even the most idiotic of left liberals can't think that the Lib Dems are left of labour, and less tory-like than labour now, can they? Why on earth would the party think that message was a good idea? crazy. Stuff like this makes me think that we are best off out of electoral politics entirely. How can you deal with people like the ones who wrote this?
 
I reckon there's a good chance that Clegg could fall victim to a Portillo-style decapitation. Lots of 'third party' voters switching from the Lib Dems to UKIP and Labour are going to pour money into the seat. Can't wait to see his face, although I'm sure the EU Commission awaits regardless..
 
Anyone else had a letter through the door recently asking themselves/their partner/their wife to stand for the libdems in their local council elections in may? Since we have never had anything to do with them, I was wondering if they are getting so desperate that they are asking randoms to have a go or if it was some sort of administrative fuckup? :D
 
Anyone else had a letter through the door recently asking themselves/their partner/their wife to stand for the libdems in their local council elections in may? Since we have never had anything to do with them, I was wondering if they are getting so desperate that they are asking randoms to have a go or if it was some sort of administrative fuckup? :D
They've always done this - and I've seen the Tories do it as well. It's a good idea IMO.
 
Anyone else had a letter through the door recently asking themselves/their partner/their wife to stand for the libdems in their local council elections in may? Since we have never had anything to do with them, I was wondering if they are getting so desperate that they are asking randoms to have a go or if it was some sort of administrative fuckup? :D

This could be quite fun...
 
the lib dems are shit because if you put one in with your wash it doesn't end up clean but covered in all manner of foul excretions. and with a drowned body.
 
the lib dems are shit because if you put one in with your wash it doesn't end up clean but covered in all manner of foul excretions. and with a drowned body.
hmm, interesting. would they drown? or otherwise asphyxiate? internal injuries possibly.

we should run a few experiments. one or two might even survive
 
hmm, interesting. would they drown? or otherwise asphyxiate? internal injuries possibly.

we should run a few experiments. one or two might even survive

I could help - my washing machine eats big holes in clothes, so it might be able to macerate a LibDem or two.
 
This is brilliant stuff - last week the lib-dems revealed to a hand picked group of Guardian, Independent and New Statesman journos that they had employed survation to carry private constituency polling for them and the results were brilliant and they were on course to do far far better than anyone suspected ( example). The journos were allowed to see 10 or so out of the 100 polls. Survation have no basically called them liars in this statement and insisting that:

In reference to polls conducted for the Liberal Democrats, which have been described in the Guardian, New Statesman and others as “private polling conducted by Survation”, we would like to clarify that the role of Survation in these polls was that of “field and tab” only.

Survation were not responsible for drafting the questionnaires used, sampling design discussions or analysis of the results. These polls should therefore not properly be described as “Survation polls.

In brief, the Lib Dems wrote survey, designed sample and analysed the data...

So they've turned a bunch of comfort polls into their pollsters calling them liars - and the journos who dutifully trotted out their stories are not going to be too happy either. Cannot touch anything without turning it to shit.
 
3 debates vs 1 Football match. Plausible.
its about 22mill v 20. But that's just adding the individual debate totals up. Odds on the majority of people watched more4 than one debate, so it isn't really true that 'More people..' watched them than the WCF
 
its about 22mill v 20. But that's just adding the individual debate totals up. Odds on the majority of people watched more4 than one debate, so it isn't really true that 'More people..' watched them than the WCF

Yeah, I know. Same people watching the three debates.
 
Back
Top Bottom