Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the lib-dems are shit

Lib Dem councillor: "some see the benefits of domestic violence"

http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/...violence-columba-blango-lib-dem-simon-hughes/

The former mayor of Southwark has compared domestic violence with smacking — and refused to apologise after claiming that some see “benefits” in the crime.
Cllr Columba Blango, who is a colleague of Lib Dem deputy leader Simon Hughes and represents the ward neighbouring his house, has shocked colleagues with his views on the subject:
“It’s like smacking. Some people see the benefits of smacking. Some don’t see it.”​
In remarks recorded in official council minutes and later attributed to Blango, the councillor claimed “some perpetrators might not be able to prevent themselves” from slapping their partner in “the spur of the moment.”

When a female councillor suggested he should apologise for comments made in the meeting of Southwark Council’s Education, Children’s Services and Leisure Committee, he dismissed her as being “emotional”.

Fellow Southwark councillor and sometime occupant of the BBC Sunday Politics sofa Rowenna Davis – who was in the car-crash meeting — told Scrapbook that “there’s no room for ambiguity when it comes to domestic violence”:

“I have constituents who suffer from domestic violence. The vast majority of Lib Dems would be appalled by Cllr Blango’s comments. But what does Simon Hughes think of his colleague and a supposed community leader propagating this kind of attitude?”​

(PS Book's emphasis)

:eek: wtf?
 
:D

We're at cross-purposes! To be honest I'd never heard of Nether Wallop and I thought articul8 had made it up. There you go, you learn something new each day.

But what butchers was after was the name of the creepy little lib-demmy-boy sitting front right of the photo. And that sure ain't George Young.

(unless I've misunderstood it all again).

PS Little-known fact; I was sent on a work-placement at George Young's constituency office when I was on the dole in the 80s. Enjoyed myself mis-filing things all day and generally twiddling my thumbs. It was in Acton and I was there about 8 days and the front window of the office got bricked in twice in that time. Those were the days...

Sure you're not thinking of George Younger?
 
I can well believe that - their staff is totally clueless - this is the party that turned Clegg-mania into a loss of seats *in the good times* :D
 
The Lib Dems are shit because at the Hallam University freshers fair they were giving away beer mats that said "I (picture of a heart) me". I shit you not. They even had it on a poster behind the stall. A mate picked one up, if I can I'll take a pic and post it up.

And despite dishonestly claiming to oppose their own party in government over the Richard O'Dwyer extradition (O'Dwyer is a Hallam student) by having a petition against it only 5 people signed up on their mailing list. My loony left group got almost 50 - nearly 10 times as many. That's fucking funny when you consider that they're in government whereas no fucker has even heard of us!
 
The Lib Dems are shit because at the Hallam University freshers fair they were giving away beer mats that said "I (picture of a heart) me". I shit you not. They even had it on a poster behind the stall. A mate picked one up, if I can I'll take a pic and post it up.

And despite dishonestly claiming to oppose their own party in government over the Richard O'Dwyer extradition (O'Dwyer is a Hallam student) by having a petition against it only 5 people signed up on their mailing list. My loony left group got almost 50 - nearly 10 times as many. That's fucking funny when you consider that they're in government whereas no fucker has even heard of us!

I hope it was PD you got 50 sigs for?
 
Of course. Also managed to arrange a debate on the Iranian nuclear programme with the AWL (we're arguing in favour, naturally).
 
He's a hundred times worse than anyone who 'Pauline Calf' might be based on.
Nick+Clegg+Liberal+Democrats.jpg

But I like his haircut.
Steve+Coogan+Liberal+Democrats.jpg
 
Hope that's not a recent picture and Coogan has ditched the LDs by now. Good to see you back, btw sihhi.

He was on QT last week and was talking about having a private meeting with Clegg about something or other.. so I don't think so.
 
Hope that's not a recent picture and Coogan has ditched the LDs by now. Good to see you back, btw sihhi.

As far as I know he's not (and never has been) a LD - he's visiting all the conferences talking about media reform, so has that round his neck as a security credential.
 
Steve Coogan: “I support Labour and I would certainly get involved under Miliband – I’m not bothered about personality,... I used to be apolitical; I didn’t want to alienate people, and all the rest of it, but I don’t really care about that anymore. I’m sometimes very Left-wing, other times I’m a little Left-wing, but I never go right of that centre post." (Telegraph 29 Jan 2012)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/9046812/A-ha-Can-Steve-Coogan-save-Ed-Miliband.html
 
Steve Coogan: “I support Labour and I would certainly get involved under Miliband – I’m not bothered about personality,... I used to be apolitical; I didn’t want to alienate people, and all the rest of it, but I don’t really care about that anymore. I’m sometimes very Left-wing, other times I’m a little Left-wing, but I never go right of that centre post." (Telegraph 29 Jan 2012)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/9046812/A-ha-Can-Steve-Coogan-save-Ed-Miliband.html

Were Coogan's family in Mayo FF or FG, does anyone know?
 
Now the latest stage of the boundary changes proposals have been published and shown to be pretty generous to the lib-dems i predict their commitment not to vote for them will bought off by a proposal to state fund them (the party that is) in one way or another.
 
Now the latest stage of the boundary changes proposals have been published and shown to be pretty generous to the lib-dems i predict their commitment not to vote for them will bought off by a proposal to state fund them (the party that is) in one way or another.
You might be right, although even by his own abysmal standards Clegg would have to do some amazing u-turn after having absolutely categorically ruled it out.
 
You might be right, although even by his own abysmal standards Clegg would have to do some amazing u-turn after having absolutely categorically ruled it out.

I think there will have to be another general election before it will be proposed again.
 
Lib-dems made big fuss about their proposed modernisation of the electoral system via introducing a recall of MPs mechanism in their manifesto:

Give you the right to sack MPs who have broken the rules. We would introduce a recall system so that constituents could force a by-election for any MP found responsible for serious wrongdoing.

They claimed that they forced it onto the formal coalition agreement as well:

We will bring forward early legislation to introduce a power of recall, allowing voters to force a by-election where an MP is found to have engaged in serious wrongdoing and having had a petition calling for a by-election signed by 10% of his or her constituents.

Well, now their govt have responded to Political and Constitutional Reform Committee's scrutiny of the proposed bill. We now find they endorse this finding:

commttee said:
We believe that a system of full recall may deter MPs from taking decisions that are unpopular locally or unpopular in the short-term, but which are in the long-term national interest. It may also discourage them from taking on powerful interests, or expressing controversial or unusual opinions. The Government argues that a recall mechanism should not leave MPs vulnerable to attack from those who simply disagree with them. We agree. For these reasons, we cannot support a system of full recall.

lib-dem/tory govt said:
The Government welcomes the Committee's conclusion on a system of full recall.
 
Back
Top Bottom