I thought that sort of shit had stopped (sending trans people to prison according to gender assigned at birth)
Or does it depend just what stage of transition someone's at?
Not to mention 'longstanding policy' as if that were some kind of justification. They've got this wrong for ever! Well done.The Metro version of the story as linked says "because passport".
The Metro version of the story as linked says "because passport".
Back in the day (late 1960s-1970s: once the gender clinic at Charing Cross had opened in 1968 and transsexualism was officially recognized), you could get a one-year passport with a letter from your doctor. This was renewable on a yearly basis until you had your operation then you could apply for a normal 10 year passport.Ah.
I *think* you can at least now request a new birth certificate / passport (if so, it's only been allowed for the last 10 years or so) but no idea quite where in the process you have to be to do this.
When I was a bit more involved in LGBTetc stuff (early 90s) I'm pretty sure that as far as the law was concerned you were legally the gender you'd been assigned at birth no matter what.
Which did of course mean that a few same-sex couples could legally marry...
From 2004/5 they introduced the 'certificate' procedure and now you have to have the certificate before you get a passport.
Yes, you're right. You can either present the gender certificate, the amended birth certificate or a doctor letter.A psych letter is (or at least was a couple of years ago) still good enough for a passport to be issued. You don't need a GRC.
It wasn't that I thought you were being inconsistent (not read enough of your posts to know) it's just that the way you put it - I can't decide between oozed and dripped - droozed patriarchy.
surely patriarchy spurts rather than oozes?
surely patriarchy spurts rather than oozes?
is what gets people's backs up before they read this:I have chosen to embrace a definition of 'woman' that includes trans women. That choice is based more on compassion than on logic or science.
Plus your view of what contemporary feminist discourse should concentrate on may not be welcomed by contemporary feminists of any stripe. They are quite capable of discerning that for themselves. BTW, last I heard you don't have to be a woman to be a feminist.Whilst I understand the views of some women who would exclude trans women, not only am I unconvinced by them, but, also I see little point in arguing about the definition whilst trans women are being killed, abused, driven to suicide etc. In my opinion, it would be good if this issue stopped taking up such a disproportionate amount of contemporary feminist discourse - better surely to focus on DV, wage differentials, etc., etc. And better to put to bed an issue that's bringing out the worst on both sides, and so is very divisive. I hope that a movement towards a more inclusive feminism can be bought about be a calmer conversation, which fosters empathy on both sides.
Was it TERFs who took exception to what Athos said? I just can't keep up.Isn't he referring to TERFs though, rather than feminists of every stripe?
I thought that sort of shit had stopped (sending trans people to prison according to gender assigned at birth)
Or does it depend just what stage of transition someone's at?
Magistrates. Need I say more?I think it comes down to the judge. Whose obviously wrong in this case.
Was it TERFs who took exception to what Athos said? I just can't keep up.
Thanks for this article, it's been really helpful in clarifying for me the way "terf" and accusations of transphobia are being used to silence women who don't share the 'right' view of gender. This in particular: "Lisa posted a link to this on her twitter:
Comment: The attack on Germaine Greer shows identity politics has become a cult
Just to ramp things up a bit more
Magistrates. Need I say more?
She's pre-op.How did they even find out she was trans? If she had committed some horrendous crime I could see someone wanting to make her life as miserable as possible ,but, she didn't so it just looks like stupidity.
I think it comes down to the judge. Whose obviously wrong in this case.
How did they even find out she was trans? If she had committed some horrendous crime I could see someone wanting to make her life as miserable as possible ,but, she didn't so it just looks like stupidity.
Tbh that article just highlights for me how disingenuous Greer is being. 'It's just an opinion' says probably the single most famous feminist in the UK (bet if you asked in the street for people to name a feminist, her name would be the clear winner). No it's not just an opinion - it's a position that she is using her status to put into the public domain, and she is doing so in a deliberately crass way that simply ignores whole aspects of questions of identity, in particular the psychological aspect.Thanks for this article, it's been really helpful in clarifying for me the way "terf" and accusations of transphobia are being used to silence women who don't share the 'right' view of gender. This in particular: "
There are people who believe that trans women are women, and there are transphobic bigots who "deny trans people's right to exist". No intermediate position is possible"
When even transwomen are abused and told to kill themselves for committing thoughtcrime then it seems it is more about maintaining ideological purity than anything else.
How did they even find out she was trans? If she had committed some horrendous crime I could see someone wanting to make her life as miserable as possible ,but, she didn't so it just looks like stupidity.
Thought the article said she had had 6 years of surgery so assumed the surgery was finished anyway if she lives as a woman send her to a female jail.She's pre-op.