believe when its beheaded and buried at the crossroads with an ex tory PM in its mouth.
FTFY
believe when its beheaded and buried at the crossroads with an ex tory PM in its mouth.
I was reading over the weekend that the 1922 committee have a great deal of leeway over what's put to the membership - it's not necessarily two. They could give a choice of 3 or 4 or even just one (in theory).But it all boils down to which are the last two candidates chosen by the mps - and the tory membership pick the most fuckwitted right winger on offer
Don't think so; not without a fairly long-winded process of internal party policy change going, ultimately, to the party's 'Constitutional college'.I was reading over the weekend that the 1922 committee have a great deal of leeway over what's put to the membership - it's not necessarily two. They could give a choice of 3 or 4 or even just one (in theory).
Maybe, but the published rules seem pretty clear tbh.Well maybe. I can't find the thing I was reading now and I've no interest in combing through the tory rulebook to check. But it was one of those politics professors on twitter, who usually get the detail of this kind of stuff right, even if their analysis is often off.
Any of the above.It's perhaps for a separate thread with accompanying poll, but who would be the worst for us/the UK/humanity/other superior creatures (delete as applicable)? I lean towards Johnson, because he seems to get a pass from many, in politics and outside, due to his "character"?
Rees-Mogg. He would want to rip the country up for a fire sale. Johnson would be a relatively regular tory shit, imo. That's what he was as London mayor.It's perhaps for a separate thread with accompanying poll, but who would be the worst for us/the UK/humanity/other superior creatures (delete as applicable)? I lean towards Johnson, because he seems to get a pass from many, in politics and outside, due to his "character"?
May's voice in this evening's interviews...sounds a bit 'Parisian' to me...I reckon Brady's already told her tbh
View attachment 155277
"We will fight on..."
I tipped JRM way back. This is not an endorsement BTW.
A bit too modern for your tastes no doubt.
Indeed.Angela Eagle has just tweeted" "Theresa May is unable to provide the leadership this huge task needs. I believe I can"
My vote goes to Amber Rudd. I think she would have been a strong frontrunner if she hadn't been caught lying about Windrush. Lying about Windrush should of course disqualify her, but I think the tories are that shameless that they would vote her in anyway. As importantly, I think she really wants it and has absolutely no shame about whatever she might have to do to get it (although that probably applies to all of them tbf).
The post is always a poisoned chalice, to a greater or lesser extent, but at the moment, what even moderately sane person would want it it?
You could have said exactly the same thing when May became leader. She's had two years strutting the world stage, being a leader. Being somebody. That's what they are all aiming for. I would think that the majority of them are absolutely desperate to do it. One of the reasons I still think it could be Rudd is because she is clearly prepared to do whatever it takes. Windrush lies and wafer thin constituency count against her, but they all have stuff that count against them.The post is always a poisoned chalice, to a greater or lesser extent, but at the moment, what even moderately sane person would want it it?
The post is always a poisoned chalice, to a greater or lesser extent, but at the moment, what even moderately sane person would want it it?
So would I. I'd be kicked out/assassinated within about a week, though.I'd do it.
So would I. I'd be kicked out/assassinated within about a week, though.