intersol32
Well-Known Member
A) That basic premis is sooo basic its abstract, you generalise far too much, and do not specify anything, its totally divorced from economics and struggles/protest, and any real group.
B) That's a straw man, not found in the reality of any of my posts.
C) Again, more simplistic generalisations, shouldn't that read 'next to nothing should be done' rather than "something must be done" btw? I know that's not genorous, but it seems more realistic in the totality of the real political picture to me.
Your posts would be fine, if they actually made any sense to anyone other than yourself. I think the above is what Orwell meant when he mentioned "political language" giving the appearance of solidity to pure wind.
It's a poor show when debate descends into theoretical and verbal gymnastics, rather than addressing the points with any substance.
Also, somewhat bizarre, you appear quite self-congratulatory when waffling about these theories of yours whilst making such basic errors as mis-spelling "premise" and "generous".
You're a strange chap, and I must say I'm quite bemused by the whole thing.