Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

welfare state breakdown

Just to add - having a focus and interests is definitely important for mental health and recovery from drug problems. This is not often the same as work though.

again agreed, but "labouring" is part of what we are as social animals. without work its difficult to attribute meaning to our lives, a sense of self, presents a lack of "label" (not getting into that argument.. we just need them ok! ;) ) limits social circle (as said) and so on

the benfits of working far outstrip any downside
 
hiya again eric :)

fond of saying the same thing.. i guess that's an attribute from your parliamentary days?

dont understand this concept of support for the welfare state but your taxes are only your taxes and only you can claim them...... so whose taxes pays for al the other people who claim benefits but haven't paid taxes?

The point is that's no more ludicrous an assertion than your claim that your taxes are paying for any other individual's benefits. Taxes go into a general pot and we elect a government to decide what to do with it as well as setting the level of taxation. If you have a problem with that you should start by demanding an end to representative democracy. If you have no problem with it your comments make absolutely no sense. The fact that millions of other people are as dumb and self obsessed as you doesn't make it logical.

must be just mine i guess as your taxes are only your taxes and no one else is allowed to touch them...... mmmmmmmm

don't you have to declare all assets over £8k and then you are not entitled to any benefits? not defrauding the state benefit system are we?

Do you understand the concept of past, present and future. In the past I paid my taxes on the understanding that money I was paying in the present would be going into the pot I might have to draw out of in the future if my circumstances changed. After several decades of work I got ill. At present I draw on the pot of money I contributed to for decades in order to give me the chance to recover my health and thus be able to make a contribution again in the future.

You may live in some sort of "eternal now", but most of us live in the real universe.

ah.. i guess you are off work on the sick.. no hang on you cant be off sick as you are

and of course you couldn't be off sick nor actually unemployed as that would mean you are seeking a job, not out riding your bicycle.. and of course if too sick to work, too sick to ride a bike...

That simply isn't true. There are a number of conditions that would make somebody unfit to work whilst still capable of riding a bike. In my case I can't currently do either, but it's quite possible that I could recover enought to ride a bike before I recover sufficiently to go back to work. Are you sure you are basing your posts on any real information, or are you just retreading Daily Mail editorials?

as an ex parliamentarian, you really should be more careful what you say in public, in writing, on the internet[/QUOTE]

Past present and future again. Do you understand the concept of having done something in the past and expecting to be able to do it again in the future, or are you completely incapable of coping with a concept as basic as time?

Either you are a complete moron, or you are an amazingly self righteous twat. Or possibly both.
 
again agreed, but "labouring" is part of what we are as social animals. without work its difficult to attribute meaning to our lives, a sense of self, presents a lack of "label" (not getting into that argument.. we just need them ok! ;) ) limits social circle (as said) and so on

the benfits of working far outstrip any downside

As I said, we need things to do, but employment as currently organised is not about attributing meaning or any of that, it's about capital and profit. That is often detrimental to people's well being.
 
again agreed, but "labouring" is part of what we are as social animals. without work its difficult to attribute meaning to our lives, a sense of self, presents a lack of "label" (not getting into that argument.. we just need them ok! ;) ) limits social circle (as said) and so on

and you base this assumption on what exactly
 
That's what I meant. As for what their clients might think, it's no more important than jonas' musings. They're on the same path, jonases-in-waiting. Welfarism. Pah.
 
and you base this assumption on what exactly


eh? are you even suggesting that working is not healthy and "normal"

weve always done it from days of "working" to collect our fruit and nuts to working in todays system in exchange for tokens which we then exchange for our fruit and nuts

even those whose life style i envy (probably in an ill informed way) that have truely opted out of the rat race and are self sufficent with regards their energy and nutritional needs, work.. they grow their food, generate their power and maintian their life style through this "working"

they dont have some bloke that comes round and does it for them out of the kindness of his heart


but if you want a psych paper analysing the role and purpose fo worke for our mental well being, you couldve googled it for your self

"The primary theme of this article, which serves as the introductory contribution of a special section of the "American Psychologist," is that work plays a central role in the development, expression, and maintenance of psychological health. The argument underlying this assumption is articulated at the outset of the article in conjunction with a historical review of vocational psychology and industrial/organizational psychology. The article follows with an overview of contemporary vocational psychology and a presentation of the psychology-of-working perspective, which has emerged from critiques of vocational psychology and from multicultural, feminist, and expanded epistemological analyses of psychological explorations of working. Three illustrative lines of inquiry in which research has affected the potential for informing public policy are presented. These three lines of scholarship (role of work in recovery from mental illness; occupational health psychology; and working, racism, and psychological health) are reviewed briefly to furnish exemplars of how the psychological study of working can inform public policy."

but i forgot,,, people want everyone else to meet their needs for them
 
no jonas sense of self demands it, we havent actually heard what his clients might think


i endoevouir to meet my cleints needs based on what they say they want.. i may discuss with them hether their wants are realistic and achievable, but if its legal and within the remit of the service i work in, i will do my utmost to either deliver it for them or enable them to deliver it for themselves

preferably the latter, its worth more if you gain it for yourself
 
Firstly, you imply, I infer. Secondly you're full of shit. What good is a 'previous market' to anyone exactly? Why not just suggest that the unemployed get on the next steamer for the colonies to seek their fortune? I really don't understand what you mean when you say there are 2,400,000 unemployed, 430,000 vacancies and no shortage of jobs. And lets not forget that every person you kick off of IB is another person who is going to be topping up the dole claimant count and fighting with all the other people for a handful of jobs.

And let's not forget that 'a job' doesn't necessarily mean a good job, or a full time job or a long term job. If you're claiming JSA and you're offered some agency work it's unlikely to escape your notice that there will be no guarantee of how many hours you will get and so no guaranteed income. You will also be aware that if you sign off JSA and then lose your new job you might be waiting up to six weeks to restart your JSA claim, and with only two weeks' part time wages to live on in the meantime. When we create what you seem so keen on, ie a situation where nobody is allowed to turn down an offer of work, we create a situation where employers can treat staff just however the fuck they like and know that the workers won't have any choice but to put up with it. And even if all 430,000 vacancies were filled tomorow morning, the fact remains that two million people, or five million if you count IB claimants, will still be out of work. When there's no vacancies left anywhere would you finally accept the fact that it is possible to be unemployed without choosing to be unemployed?

You said it better than i could, and to add to that ....

You (Jona) say you like your job, in which case what is it in life that is making you so bitter towards the disabled?
 
again agreed, but "labouring" is part of what we are as social animals. without work its difficult to attribute meaning to our lives, a sense of self, presents a lack of "label" (not getting into that argument.. we just need them ok! ;) ) limits social circle (as said) and so on

the benfits of working far outstrip any downside

at Macdonalds?
 
i endoevouir to meet my cleints needs based on what they say they want.. i may discuss with them hether their wants are realistic and achievable, but if its legal and within the remit of the service i work in, i will do my utmost to either deliver it for them or enable them to deliver it for themselves

preferably the latter, its worth more if you gain it for yourself

so do you work for the nash?
 
It sounds like jonas' job was created to keep them off the streets in the first place. As for their bitterness. Well. It's self contempt. Obviously.
 
It sounds like jonas' job was created to keep them off the streets in the first place. As for their bitterness. Well. It's self contempt. Obviously.


does he work at the nash? A mate of mine does and he is seriously thinking of packing his job in as he is simply embarrassed about the Govt's workfare proposals which are straight out of the BNP handbook...
 
Whilst we're at it. Let me add we're not talking about some property magnate in a wheel chair here. By disabled we mean the ones that happen to be poor besides. The bitterness comes from the “Christian” deliberation on moral choice. You know. Like the parents-on-benefits thing.
 
eh? are you even suggesting that working is not healthy and "normal"

weve always done it from days of "working" to collect our fruit and nuts to working in todays system in exchange for tokens which we then exchange for our fruit and nuts

even those whose life style i envy (probably in an ill informed way) that have truely opted out of the rat race and are self sufficent with regards their energy and nutritional needs, work.. they grow their food, generate their power and maintian their life style through this "working"

they dont have some bloke that comes round and does it for them out of the kindness of his heart


but if you want a psych paper analysing the role and purpose fo worke for our mental well being, you couldve googled it for your self

"The primary theme of this article, which serves as the introductory contribution of a special section of the "American Psychologist," is that work plays a central role in the development, expression, and maintenance of psychological health. The argument underlying this assumption is articulated at the outset of the article in conjunction with a historical review of vocational psychology and industrial/organizational psychology. The article follows with an overview of contemporary vocational psychology and a presentation of the psychology-of-working perspective, which has emerged from critiques of vocational psychology and from multicultural, feminist, and expanded epistemological analyses of psychological explorations of working. Three illustrative lines of inquiry in which research has affected the potential for informing public policy are presented. These three lines of scholarship (role of work in recovery from mental illness; occupational health psychology; and working, racism, and psychological health) are reviewed briefly to furnish exemplars of how the psychological study of working can inform public policy."

but i forgot,,, people want everyone else to meet their needs for them

shouldnt you be working
 
does he work at the nash?
Dunno. Sounds more like some third party agency like AddAction or whatever. Careful with that BNP reference by the way. Cheap shots like that only advance their case. The BNP if anything are distinctly anglo-saxon welfarist. It is the National Health Service after all.
 
Dunno. Sounds more like some third party agency like AddAction or whatever. Careful with that BNP reference by the way. Cheap shots like that only advance their case. The BNP if anything are distinctly anglo-saxon welfareist. It is the National Health Service after all.

being anti welfare state like Jonas is , is a nazi policy. Hitler was the same.
 
i should explain myself better, fascism has always been survival of the fittest and fuck the rest. Jonas might not want the disabled put into gas chambers but he'd be quite prepared to let em starve to death...
 
Oh please. That's just some boy scout take on Socialist=Nice and Fascist=Evil rubbish. Like some cosmic battle between the good and kind vs the bad and mean.
 
eh? are you even suggesting that working is not healthy and "normal"

weve always done it from days of "working" to collect our fruit and nuts to working in todays system in exchange for tokens which we then exchange for our fruit and nuts

even those whose life style i envy (probably in an ill informed way) that have truely opted out of the rat race and are self sufficent with regards their energy and nutritional needs, work.. they grow their food, generate their power and maintian their life style through this "working"

they dont have some bloke that comes round and does it for them out of the kindness of his heart


but if you want a psych paper analysing the role and purpose fo worke for our mental well being, you couldve googled it for your self

"The primary theme of this article, which serves as the introductory contribution of a special section of the "American Psychologist," is that work plays a central role in the development, expression, and maintenance of psychological health. The argument underlying this assumption is articulated at the outset of the article in conjunction with a historical review of vocational psychology and industrial/organizational psychology. The article follows with an overview of contemporary vocational psychology and a presentation of the psychology-of-working perspective, which has emerged from critiques of vocational psychology and from multicultural, feminist, and expanded epistemological analyses of psychological explorations of working. Three illustrative lines of inquiry in which research has affected the potential for informing public policy are presented. These three lines of scholarship (role of work in recovery from mental illness; occupational health psychology; and working, racism, and psychological health) are reviewed briefly to furnish exemplars of how the psychological study of working can inform public policy."

but i forgot,,, people want everyone else to meet their needs for them

You're missing the essential point - work in a capitalist society is not the same as work in a hunter gatherer society. The nature of social relations, property relations etc is different.
 
Ahh Social Relations. What's the content of these social relations? "Exploitation"? As if it's a bad thing.
 
Irritating in so far as they don't reinforce your arbitrary and magical beliefs. Like life in general, ignore everything that doesn’t flatter your trite little quasi-religious framework of good and evil, right and wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom