ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I don't think the derailers will ultimately succeed with their diversions.
So why keep derailing?
I don't think the derailers will ultimately succeed with their diversions.
Only in terms of wealth and in terms of historical significance, otherwise, it's just a backwater where people practice a backward version of Sunni Islam.Quite an important country Saudi Arbia in the Muslim world you know (?)
That's not my impression of the thread at all. While it started out as that, we've lately shouted at each other about stoning and sharia laws, none of which has much to do with UK muslims in particular.
did you not notice all that stuff about Norway?
No but I can keep my eyes straight. Not had a drink since Friday, and I've never had a sleeping pill in my life!
I'll sleep when I'm dead, life is far too short as it is...
Look fool, you practically begged me to find evidence of your past addictions, I knew you'd spoken of them before, and after your indignant demands for evidence, I simply tapped you up on the search engine for the keyword "alcoholic". It's not rocket science.
Yeah, maybe it was a bit cold, but here you are trying to paint me as a liar and yet I've proved you really did have an issue with the booze and the night-night tablets.
Don't hate me just because I called your bluff.
are you being deliberately dense? But if you want to stick with what the thread began as, 100 pages ago, then fine. But I think it's mostly been covered
There are none so blind as those who think they see.
okay, you havent got anything to say, have you?
BORING, Belboid.
There are none so blind as those who think they see.
What does that even mean?
I mean, are you trying to set yourself up as a martyr who gets slagged off because of his "politically incorrect" views? Are you trying to establish some kind of comparison of degree of fucked-upness between being "politically incorrect" and being made by your religion to feel guilty because some pervert priest assaulted you, what?
the idea of "sin" has played a strong role in inducing shame and silence in victims of abuse
Did you not notice all that stuff about yet another case of stoning in Afganistan?
Bit of a foolish line to use when corresponding with someone who is required to be literate in order to read the reply you make to them.
No but I can keep my eyes straight. Not had a drink since Friday, and I've never had a sleeping pill in my life!
I'll sleep when I'm dead, life is far too short as it is...
Look fool, you practically begged me to find evidence of your past addictions, I knew you'd spoken of them before, and after your indignant demands for evidence, I simply tapped you up on the search engine for the keyword "alcoholic". It's not rocket science.
Yeah, maybe it was a bit cold, but here you are trying to paint me as a liar and yet I've proved you really did have an issue with the booze and the night-night tablets.
Don't hate me just because I called your bluff.
I was responding to your post, the post where you said:
It seems quite clear to me if you replace the word "sin" with "political correctness" then one could quite easily demonstrate that there is an equally strong role there in inducing shame and silence in victims of abuse.
Both involve a fear of offending uptight quasi-religious principles.
So why keep derailing?
You are not really that stupid.
Embarrassing. Have you asked for help or are you still in denial?
You are not really that stupid. You won't get away with it.
You on the other hand...
Louis MacNeice
Fucking hell VP, you're normally better than this...
Not in the case of sin.
Louis MacNeice
there's more chance of a witty rejoinder from ian gow or airey neave than there is of one from you.I see you're still clinging on to this runaway thread, without really bothering to read or comprehend it, just hopping on for the ride and chucking in what passes for a witty retort when you can.
I'm not having a dig, I'm genuinely curious.
Not in the case of sin.
Louis MacNeice