I'm saying I can't find any proof of his existence other than as a quoted police source attributed as saying precisely the same thing about several different sets of statistics for different years. All of them claiming to show a Muslim rape epidemic in Oslo, and none of them backed up with any official statistics beyond a few headline number.
I agree, info on him is scant. Worth a deeper search perhaps in case he really is a fake.
But Hanne Kristin Rohde exists.
I can't view the video on my PC, and I can't find anything in print other than Rohde simply making an assertion that all 41 assault rapes over 3 years were committed by non-Western immigrants.
You can't have tried very hard. About 19,200 results I got, including UNHCR reports and her very own Wikipedia page, which can be translated to English. She was voted Person of the Year or something in 2010 and she is frequently quoted by NRK.
I have already posted a link to an analysis of the real official statistics earlier in the thread.
You mean that 227 page novel you slapped up, with no passages quoted, no context, not a jot of explanation or even a page number?
I hope not, and if you have posted any link of relevance, "earlier in the thread" isn't good enough.
You quote stats - you put up link.
I've repeatedly done so with my data.
This thread has well over a thousand posts now.
You do this properly or not at all.
I never said the article was reprinted annually by Aftonbladet, but only that it appears one a large number of web sites variously claiming it to be a newly released report for every year since 2001 when the original article was printed. I'm not saying Aftonbladet reprinted it. I'm saying that the vast majority of the web sites quoting it are LYING about when the report came out.
Are they lying about the dates? The data? Are they just making numbers appear from thin air?
I'm doing way better than you are.
You'll be neck and neck if you show me the links to the Oslo cop data that contradicts Hanne Kristin Rohde.
So far you've basically got two statistically unsupported statements from Norway
Uh, no - in what way are they "unsupported". Where can you prove they are unsupported? You haven't posted a relevant link yet.
and a load of speculation based on a grand total of 4 cases from the UK.
A grand total of four cases? Are you kidding me?
Have you even bothered to do a basic Google?
I could probably list 20 cases that appear to be identical on a single Google search, but to what end? It doesn't mean I'm wrong or right.
The premise is very clear, and I want you to disprove it.
Publishing tons of links to these stories in one place would play right into the hands of the undesirables, and this place would get trolled to fuck by boneheads.
I've posted links. However you are clearly demanding something impossible, official statistical proof in the form of a short paragraph of words of one syllable. If you aren't prepared to look into the actual data then tough luck, all you'll ever have to go on is tabloid bollocks and racist blogposts.
Just post the links. Linking to abstract 227 page documents aren't 'proof' of anything, and you know it.
The actual department is the sexual and violent crimes division. My point is that there is a single quote from a single police source attributed to several different sets of statistics over a decade, all of them using precisely the same mistake in translation.
Ah so it's a translation error? Please explain.
It says to me a total lack of interest in fact checking.
You appear to have a lack of interest in relevant link providing.
I would hardly describe Aftonbladet as a respected news source. It's the Scandanavian equivalent of the Sun. Not quite as bad, but hardly a particularly reputable newspaper. It's a scandal sheet that is apparently running downhill about as fast as it's running out of money.
But even if you were correct - which you are not - Aftonbladet in Norway is not the equivalent of the Scum at all - the NRK national broadcast station has been running the same stories.
The Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (Norwegian: Norsk Rikskringkasting AS), which is usually known as the NRK, is the Norwegian government-owned radio and television public broadcasting company, and the largest media organisation in Norway.
It is a founding member of the European Broadcasting Union.
The source of all this is Hanne Kristin Rohde.
So is she lying or what?
Show us some figures to prove it.
Vorstellen?
