editor
hiraethified
And the main story from the front page of that site is...Amazing UFO Footage, PhoenixDrJazzz said:
Nutjobs. One and all.
video debunking 9/11 conspiracies
- Thread starter Blagsta
- Start date
Nutjobs. One and all.
Give up pk. You said the plane hit the ground first. There is nothing in the Purdue simulations (more on those later, they're good) to say that it did, and the crappy snopes article simply repeats that claim.pk said:Oh please, who are these people I've been "ingratiating" with?
That link proves everything I have ever said about you.
I have proof though - you have Rense.
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/images/sozen.pentagon3.jpeg
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
I'd enjoy this, Dr Jazzz, if I didn't have to keep repeating evidence that has already blown your toy theories out of the window before, many times.
The quickest look at all the photos on the link I posted makes an absolute piffling nonsense of the claim 'the aircraft bounced on the lawn'. What matter whether its on Rense or the BBC?
Do you really still maintain the utterly ludicrous nonsense that 'the plane bounced on the lawn'?
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
Here Dr Jiz?z, have some more proof..
http://www.questionsquestions.net/blog/050225pentagon_cnn.html
http://www.questionsquestions.net/blog/050225pentagon_cnn.html
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
DrJazzz said:Give up pk. You said the plane hit the ground first. There is nothing in the Purdue simulations (more on those later, they're good) to say that it did, and the crappy snopes article simply repeats that claim.
The quickest look at all the photos on the link I posted makes an absolute piffling nonsense of the claim 'the aircraft bounced on the lawn'. What matter whether its on Rense or the BBC?
Do you really still maintain the utterly ludicrous nonsense that 'the plane bounced on the lawn'?
From the simulation I saw prepared by experts, as opposed to your stoned Area 51 kids, the plane hit the ground just before impact with the wall.
Your evidence comes from one Frenchman, who wasn't even on the right side of the Earth.
And guess what.
Joe Vialls thinks you're full of shit too.
It's amazing!
Even the king conspiranoid bullshitter Vialls thinks the Pentagon Conspiracies are a sick joke.
Give it up Dr Jazzz.
----------------------
French Claim About Pentagon Jet is a Sick Joke
Captain Charles Burlingame’s widow is unlikely to appreciate the humor
Joe Vialls, March 2002
http://www.geocities.com/roboplanes/757.html
Classic!
In fact, it's interesting that pk is finding his proof on sites that are part of the 9-11 Truth Movement!
Although it has to be said, Eric Salter has been coming in for some criticism which is probably why he hasn't been updating his site. You can read some more articles on www.questionsquestions.net here
I think the truth where pk is concerned is that he's a loudmouth who just wants to abuse and, fires off links without even having a clue about them. Other posters would do well in joining me to tell him to shut the fuck up, then maybe we might get somewhere.
Although it has to be said, Eric Salter has been coming in for some criticism which is probably why he hasn't been updating his site. You can read some more articles on www.questionsquestions.net here
I think the truth where pk is concerned is that he's a loudmouth who just wants to abuse and, fires off links without even having a clue about them. Other posters would do well in joining me to tell him to shut the fuck up, then maybe we might get somewhere.
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
DrJazzz said:
I know full well what those links are about, that's why you're not responding to them.
And I invite posters to tell me to shut the fuck up - sometimes it's even deserved - but as long as that option extends to you also, "Dr".
So what do you think about your hero Joe Vialls telling you that your Pentagon theory is a sick joke?
pk - do stop posting up random links that contain nothing of any import to your claim that flight 77 'bounced on the lawn before impact', where all the photos clearly prove that it didn't. Must I put them up?
I wasn't aware the purdue university simulation had the plane bouncing, but if they did, then they clearly were feeding in the wrong trajectory, because the pristine lawn is simply stone cold hard photographic proof that it didn't 'bounce'.
What part of 'the pristine lawn proves the plane didn't bounce' are you having trouble understanding?
And you quoting Joe Vialls at me as your 'proof' (after linking to 9-11 conspiracist Eric Salter's site), well that's rather amusing I must admit. You aren't doing too well here, are you? You seem to be digging yourself deeper every post!
I wasn't aware the purdue university simulation had the plane bouncing, but if they did, then they clearly were feeding in the wrong trajectory, because the pristine lawn is simply stone cold hard photographic proof that it didn't 'bounce'.
What part of 'the pristine lawn proves the plane didn't bounce' are you having trouble understanding?
And you quoting Joe Vialls at me as your 'proof' (after linking to 9-11 conspiracist Eric Salter's site), well that's rather amusing I must admit. You aren't doing too well here, are you? You seem to be digging yourself deeper every post!
editor
hiraethified
So what difference does it make if the plane did or didn't bounce, slide, rebound, skim or scuff? It's hardly a critical element in the grand scheme of things.DrJazzz said:
No doubt you've got some enormous evidence-free bonkers theory waiting in the wings, so why don't you just get to the point and tell us what really happened?
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
Read this link Dr Jizzz, and then if you want to try to debate the Pentagon any further then fine, but you will read the link.
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/pentahole_dimensions_est.htm
It backs up the reconstruction I've seen, and the plane hits the tree and the ground just ahead of hitting the reinforced concrete wall.
And you still have yet to comment on Joe Vialls' opinions.
He's a stupid anti-Semitic cunt - but he's not as gullible as you!
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/pentahole_dimensions_est.htm
It backs up the reconstruction I've seen, and the plane hits the tree and the ground just ahead of hitting the reinforced concrete wall.
And you still have yet to comment on Joe Vialls' opinions.
He's a stupid anti-Semitic cunt - but he's not as gullible as you!
Again, you've linked to a 9-11 truth movement site pk!
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/home.html
the article certainly doesn't give evidence for the plane bouncing, in fact I don't think it claims it all, except to say that 'some people believe the nose touched the ground inches before impact' (how they spotted that is beyond me).
editor, I'm glad you can concede that the claim 'the plane bounced' was a load of twaddle, even if pk can't.
yes, I give in pk, resigned to the fact that I can't post unending utter shite as fast as you.
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/home.html
the article certainly doesn't give evidence for the plane bouncing, in fact I don't think it claims it all, except to say that 'some people believe the nose touched the ground inches before impact' (how they spotted that is beyond me).
editor, I'm glad you can concede that the claim 'the plane bounced' was a load of twaddle, even if pk can't.
pk said:
yes, I give in pk, resigned to the fact that I can't post unending utter shite as fast as you.
I'd never heard about this "Joe Vialls" character until I read this thread and seen Ed's reference about Ian Huntley.
I've just read through his drivel and there's no doubt about it. That bloke's a nutter!!!
I can't believe there's people out there that take this twat seriously.
I've just read through his drivel and there's no doubt about it. That bloke's a nutter!!!
I can't believe there's people out there that take this twat seriously.
Similar threads
