Not only that, but the church requires members to donate. & those donations are often used to push their conservative political agenda. In 2008 the church gave heavily to a ballot proposition banning gay marriage."we give 10% of our income to our church" ... I don't think that is the exact same as charitable giving. They are a member of the church they are donating to, they benefit from their own donations.
The US Republican nominee is shown saying he could not win votes of 47% of people who do not pay US income tax.
"I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives," he says.
The Mother Jones video is said to have been filmed at a private fundraiser at some point after Mr Romney became the presumptive Republican nominee.
Its picture is blurred out with the exception of Mr Romney's face, and no attendees are visible.
The income tax segment is one of several clips posted online, in which Mr Romney expands at some length on his approach to the upcoming election, and how his campaign will take on President Obama.
"There are 47% of the people who will vote for the president no matter what," Mr Romney is seen saying, referring to the percentage of Americans who have no income tax liability.
"There are 47% who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. "
who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. "
barleymow
7 minutes ago
Disagree. If he can mobilise the 53% - assuming equal distribution throughout all states - then he is home and dry. Remember Socialists are very sensitive about the spotlight being shone on their supporters. Keep it up Mitt - remind the contributors where their money goes and they will mobilise .
By the way - has it become easier to get a Doctorate recently?
"we give 10% of our income to our church" ... I don't think that is the exact same as charitable giving. They are a member of the church they are donating to, they benefit from their own donations.
“There are 47 per cent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what,” Mr. Romney is shown saying in the video of a May 17 fundraiser in Boca Raton, Fla. “There are 47 per cent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.”
Mr. Romney said in the video that his role “is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”
Tax structure very different in the US. Whole range of other local or specific taxes.Is it normal for almost half of a country to not pay income tax?
There are 47 per cent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what,” Mr. Romney is shown saying in the video of a May 17 fundraiser in Boca Raton, Fla. “There are 47 per cent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.”
No it's not bordering on fascism. It's an attempt to get funds from a rich man by a badly applied electoral analysis.
Depends on what you mean by 'mean it' - if in power he'll act on those lines. They all do. That's not bordering on fascism - that's functioning liberal democracy.so, he doesn't mean it then?
There's some truly dispiriting comments made by the usual suspects in the comment section following that article =/
No matter how bad it gets, there will always be a section of the population labouring under the misapprehension that the people at the bottom, rather than those at the top, are living off their hard work.There's some truly dispiriting comments made by the usual suspects in the comment section following that article =/
Here’s the policy two-step behind Romney’s remarks: Republicans have spent years cutting income taxes and increasing things like the Child tax Credit. This means fewer people pay income taxes. So whenever you hear a stat like "47% don't pay income taxes," remember: Reagan and Bush helped build that. These tax cuts for the poor were partly in order to make further tax cuts for the rich political palatable. But now that fewer people pay income taxes as a result of GOP policies, they’re being called lazy and dependent. And thus the GOP's tax cuts are being used to make a case that the rich are overtaxed and that the less-rich are becoming dependent. Which thus leads to a policy agenda of tax cuts for the rich and cuts to social services for the non-rich.
It's not the same: from my link earlierI don't understand the difference between "Pay Income Tax" and "Pay Payroll Tax" ...
If payroll tax is like our PAYE then the 28% do in fact pay income tax, it is just deducted at source.