Yes, Hicks did well. Though, I’d not say spectacular. Let’s remember that Hicks began his campaign nearly 18 months before McCluskey – Bayliss began his about a year before McCluskey. Thus, Hicks was campaigning for around 2½ years.
As a full-time campaigner Hicks also had an advantage over McCluskey who, as an officer of the union, held down a full-time job – and that isn’t a 35-hour week. We also need to dispel the myth of poor down-at-the-heels Jerry fighting a cash rich machine. McCluskey funded his campaign from his own pocket and through donations from Unite activists and supporters; Jerry on the other hand was bank-rolled by the SWP.
Bayliss’ ‘support’ from the mainstream media was actually a hindrance as his collapsed vote proves. In pandering to certain newspapers, most notoriously the NoTW, he alienated pretty much the entire GPM Sector of the union; his condemnation of the BASSA strike took care of rest – right-wingers and die-hard retired AEEU excepted.
So, congratulations, McCluskey.
And, well done Hicks. But, what a shame you had to run such a negative campaign treating McCluskey as the enemy instead of Bayliss. Shame on you for splitting the vote on what would have been landslide Left victory. Let’s hope now you’ll do the decent thing and work within the union; instead of your more usual role as of attacking everything and anything carried out by Unite.
Jerry, the election is over; you now have the choice to work with the United Left of the union or to go your own way. Please, choose wisely.