UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11

[frogwoman]

bollocks, probably not free on that day anyway and looks like you have to change in london

 

[cesare]

When and where is it? P&P day out

I'd be up for that

I wonder if it'd be worth sitting through 3 hours of it just to see if this is one of the few occasions when they grant a wasted costs order as well as fine him

 

[Belushi]

bollocks, probably not free on that day anyway and looks like you have to change in london

All you have to do is not pay your licence fee and then you too can have your day in court ranting about the conspiracy theory of your choice

 

[two sheds]

Why did you stop there?!



I bet that involved a series of awesome conversations

Though he's got a point with "he considered that the greatest terrorist threat to the public did not come from Islamic extremists but from internal sources within the US and British establishment."

 

[Wilf]

They should defer the case till he's 75.

 

[Firky]

Though he's got a point with "he considered that the greatest terrorist threat to the public did not come from Islamic extremists but from internal sources within the US and British establishment."

I think you have interpreted that differently to what was meant. MI5 were behind London bombings, maaan.

 

[frogwoman]

This isn't anything to do with that "Ripple Effect" shite is it?

 

[Firky]

This isn't anything to do with that "Ripple Effect" shite is it?

That cock sent his shit film to members of a jury.

 

[frogwoman]

That cock sent his shit film to members of a jury.

Cunts.

 

[Jon-of-arc]

So when the magistrate finds that the assertions of the truther movement are without merit, and certainly not a valid defence for not paying your tv licence, does this mean that the conspiracy theory has been proved wrong in a court of law, after being granted a fair hearing? Because that's how it seems. In a hunt for publicity and credibility, this seems a tactic which is basically guaranteed to backfire.

Is the defendant prepared to accept the judges verdict, even if it doesn't go in his favour? And by this, I do not mean "is he prepared to call the judge a stooge/puppet/sheep, if his defence is not upheld?"

 

[two sheds]

Have a guess

 

[butchersapron]

So when the magistrate finds that the assertions of the truther movement are without merit, ande certainly not a valid defence for not paying your tv licence, does this mean that the conspiracy theory has been proved wrong in a court of law, after being granted a fair hearing? Because that's how it seems. In a hunt for publicity and credibility, this seems a tactic which is basically guaranteed to backfire.

Is the defendant prepared to accept the judges verdict, even if it doesn't go in his favour? And by this, I do not mean "is he prepared to call the judge a stooge/puppet/sheep, if his defence is not upheld?"

The Magistrate won't even deal with any of that stuff for one second. S/he'll simply point out this case is being judged on strict liability grounds (i.e it doesn't matter why he didn't pay, all that counts is he did did or not) and all this other guff is irrelevant.

Lovely voice this Tony btw - warning - if you click on any of his other vids you will more than likely see dead kids, kids being murdered, people with their brains hanging out - all as a tribute "'GW' and his toxic, owl-worshiping, child molesting friends."

 

[stuff_it]

This is going to be a

thread, isn't it?

Mind you, I think the reporting of the case is likely to be a gem

I think that's a bit plane plain for this thread...

 

[stavros]

Expert witnesses including Neil Armstrong and Trevor Rees-Jones to be called, presumably.

 

[beesonthewhatnow]

You really must love it down at the bottom of that hole Jazzz.

 

[frogwoman]

The full version of this discussion focusing on corruption in South Yorkshire Police and Sheffield City Council, Former Principal Intelligence Analyst Tony Farrell is in brutally frank conversation with David Pidcock leader of the Islamic Party of Britain.

 

[existentialist]

I see your

and I raise you a

 

[existentialist]

The full version of this discussion focusing on corruption in South Yorkshire Police and Sheffield City Council, Former Principal Intelligence Analyst Tony Farrell is in brutally frank conversation with David Pidcock leader of the Islamic Party of Britain.

When I hear people self-describing their conversations as "brutally frank", a tiny tinfoil bell goes off in my head.

 

[Jazzz]

The Magistrate won't even deal with any of that stuff for one second. S/he'll simply point out this case is being judged on strict liability grounds (i.e it doesn't matter why he didn't pay, all that counts is he did did or not) and all this other guff is irrelevant.

Well no, as a point of law, it's not.

The draconian anti-terrorism legislation means that one is obliged not to fund any organisation where there is any suspicion that they are involved in abetting terrorist activity. This is the basis for Rooke's refusal and defence.

the Magistrate has already accepted the defence as 'arguable', hence the three hour hearing.

 

[frogwoman]

the islamic party of britain seems to have only 4 members.

 

[butchersapron]

The full version of this discussion focusing on corruption in South Yorkshire Police and Sheffield City Council, Former Principal Intelligence Analyst Tony Farrell is in brutally frank conversation with David Pidcock leader of the Islamic Party of Britain.

That's the notoriously homophobic and anti-semitic Islamic Party of Britain that reprints stuff from open nazis and facists like Alexander Baron. Only ever a few steps...

 

[butchersapron]

Well no, as a point of law, it's not.

The draconian anti-terrorism legislation means that one is obliged not to fund any organisation where there is any suspicion that they are involved in abetting terrorist activity. This is the basis for Rooke's refusal and defence.

the Magistrate has already accepted the defence as 'arguable', hence the three hour hearing.

Wrong, wrong wrong - licence fees come under strict liability - there is no defence available for not paying the TV licence fee. This will be ruled to be irrelevant guff.

 

[frogwoman]

That's the notoriously homophobic and anti-semitic Islamic Party of Britain that reprints stuff from open nazis and facists like Alexander Baron. Only ever a few steps...

from the comments:


To make it clear.
I'm suggesting Hillsborough could easily be a deliberate act carried out by a small number of cynical operatives. The purpose being an emotive means of manipulating the general population into rejecting the constables we have, leaving a vacuum to be occupied by a brutal, paramilitary private police force beholden to the bankers.

so hillsborough is our fault as well then

it would be funny if it wasnt so sick and didnt interfere with people's attempts to get justice after so many years

 

[cesare]

Well no, as a point of law, it's not.

The draconian anti-terrorism legislation means that one is obliged not to fund any organisation where there is any suspicion that they are involved in abetting terrorist activity. This is the basis for Rooke's refusal and defence.

the Magistrate has already accepted the defence as 'arguable', hence the three hour hearing.

Has Rooke been put on notice for costs?

 

[existentialist]

Well no, as a point of law, it's not.

I didn't know you were a lawyer, Jazzz?

The draconian anti-terrorism legislation means that one is obliged not to fund any organisation where there is any suspicion that they are involved in abetting terrorist activity. This is the basis for Rooke's refusal and defence.

So it would seem. I am surprised at your unwillingness to allow we sceptics to dig ourselves into a nice deep mire so that you can trot along some time early on the afternoon of the 25th, and point out to us how stupidly wrong we all were.

When what will actually happen is that this thread will have become a 50-page monster, you'll have wriggled and diverted all over the place, and probably disappeared with 15 posters hounding you for questions they asked you in double-digit post numbers and which you spent the next 17 pages insisting you'd answered, if only they'd follow the inevitable slew of prisonplanet and troofloon links you'll cite as "evidence".

The case will be heard, the loony will get his knuckles rapped by the magistrate for a) not having a licence, and b) wasting everyone's time for three hours, assuming he doesn't get a night in the cells for contempt. Which, no doubt, will be regarded in Certain Quarters as incontrovertible evidence that The Man doesn't want our hero to be speaking his unpalatable truths.

There, that's 50 pages saved.

the Magistrate has already accepted the defence as 'arguable', hence the three hour hearing.

Ah. So you're reading into the magistrate's decision to be as painstaking as possible not to feed this guy's evident persecution complex as validation for his loontastic theories?

 

[butchersapron]

from the comments:


To make it clear.
I'm suggesting Hillsborough could easily be a deliberate act carried out by a small number of cynical operatives. The purpose being an emotive means of manipulating the general population into rejecting the constables we have, leaving a vacuum to be occupied by a brutal, paramilitary private police force beholden to the bankers.

so hillsborough is our fault as well then

it would be funny if it wasnt so sick and didnt interfere with people's attempts to get justice after so many years

They also have links to holocaust denier and mate of Jazzz Nick Kollerstrom. Jazz himself claimed to have gone to brum to interview their then leader over claims the jews were really behind 7/7.

 

[frogwoman]

They also have links to holocaust denier and mate of Jazzz Nick Kollerstrom. Jazz himself claimed to have gone to brum to interview their then leader over claims the jews were really behind 7/7.

they onlyt seem to have 4 members though

 

[existentialist]

Also, I can't help wondering, if this guy is so down on the mainstream media, why he even bothers to watch ANY television, and thus needs a licence in the first place. Or maybe he regards it as "keeping the enemy under surveillance"?

Furthermore, what a shame he couldn't have logged on and spoken to longdog, who could have helpfully explained to him exactly what to do to avoid being persecuted by the evil forces of Television Licensing.

 

[frogwoman]

only ever a few steps away. fucks sake.

 

[sihhi]

That's the notoriously homophobic and anti-semitic Islamic Party of Britain that reprints stuff from open nazis and facists like Alexander Baron. Only ever a few steps...

Pidcock was on Nicky Campbell's Sunday show, managed to avoid any questions about any of that stuff.

http://www.thestar.co.uk/lifestyle/...the-remarkable-life-of-david-pidcock-1-311978

The city should mint it's own money. So says David Pidcock, Sheffield-born economist, writer, engineer and Muslim who's faith outlaws the charging of interest.
"Sheffield introduced quantitative easing in 1600 and issued its own money. Sheffield could do it again now.
"All you have to do is issue money with no interest to the bank, spend it into circulation and retire it through taxation and money supply problems are solved.
"There is no need to borrow money and pay interest that only serves the banks."
But how can such a simple solution have been overlooked by economists and politicians for centuries?

And he believes he has the answers to recession and the financial turmoil of the past two years. Too good to be true? Not according to father of two David who knows a thing or two about 'money supply' issues having, he says, lost £400,000 to the banks in dubious circumstances. He's hoping to put his views to the electorate before the General Election in May when he hopes to stand in Sheffield as a candidate for the Islamic party Of Great Britain. "The secret is the control of the money supply," he said. "We can resolve the world's financial problems in 24 hours. Debt and interest are choking the world. Debt causes war, famine and impoverishment to people everywhere."

Money. Banks and money. Banks and power, influence, corruption and money. “I was defrauded by the banks on three occasions,” said the man who made millions from buying and selling engineering equipment around the world and who once owned Bramley Park near Rotherham and a house in the south of France.

He also believes that Napoleon became a practising Muslim.