60 years is nearly a decade before state retirement age. It's a long way from elderly.So 60 is middle aged? On your calculations most grand parents are fair game for a good beating! you really do need to get a grip on reality.
I
ETA - I lied. The truth outs.
The TERF was filming and was challenged. But you know that...
The next bit was the TERF grabbed someone and held them in a headlock.
The punch came from a trans woman in an attempt to free the person in a headlock.
The person in the headlock was an assigned female at birth non binary person.
And despite all this, the TERFs called all the protesters men. Clearly not. Not in any sense.
It isn't a bloke.And I am disgusted that some of you are condoning this bloke punching a woman in the face. It's fucking awful.
Right. And a punch is a slapIt isn't a bloke.
I meant in terms of "do you want a slap", but it does seem that the woman who did the punching might have been trying to defend a cis woman in a headlock... I wasn't there. If she wasn't defending someone, then there's no excuse for punching someone... my point is that you don't have special rights not to be punched because you're a woman.Right. And a punch is a slap
People who use scare quotes around the gendered pronouns of trans people (or terms explaining transgender people) are twats. Every time. It's a rule.
Oh stop. You don't get to win this with bullshit chivalry.
First, few if any people on here are condoning the violence. Second, you might want to revisit the idea that it was 'three men'. Kind of shows up one of the prejudices on display here - a trans woman is a man, and a trans man is a man. Third, the punch did come as part of an effort to pull the person away. Watch the footage again - it's clear enough.Three men attacked the woman in question and she was lamped - for 'aggravating' them with her camera, apparently. I cannot think of a single other scenario in which so-called leftists would defend this behaviour.
my point is that you don't have special rights not to be punched because you're a woman.
The gender of the victim has been mentioned by lots of people. I'm not sure why, but her womanhood seems to for part of their objection to the punch.Who here has argued to the contrary?
And there was no unprovoked attack here, either.Gay rights activists didn't launch unprovoked physical assaults against groups of cranky radfems.
Three men did not do so. Your attitude towards trans people is apparent[/quote][/QUOTE]Three men attacked the woman in question...
Come off it. At least have the grace to admit a mistake.Yeah gender pronouns are more important than physical assault
Observable facts disagreed with by the medical establishment and the lawmakers of this country. Neither medical consensus nor the wheels of the legislature are known for moving fast or subscribing to the whims of non-establishment minorities. If people who know a fucliad more about it than you are convinced that trans gender is "real" (for want of a less clumsy term), I'm not sure where you get off calling trans women "gender dysphoric men", or calling the views of the medical community "cult like".This is a bit... cult like, isn't it. Agree with our assertions in spite of the observable facts or you're a wrong un.
Where as you coming along to rescue gender dysphoric men is genuine chivalry
You could at least learn what a pronoun is.Yeah gender pronouns are more important than physical assault
It's getting mad. We won't be able to call people n*****s next.Observable facts disagreed with by the medical establishment and the lawmakers of this country. Neither medical consensus nor the wheels of the legislature are known for moving fast or subscribing to the whims of non-establishment minorities. If people who know a fucliad more about it than you are convinced that trans gender is "real" (for want of a less clumsy term), I'm not sure where you get off calling trans women "gender dysphoric men", or calling the views of the medical community "cult like".
You could at least learn what a pronoun is.
You are defending a bigot being a bigot. You support her bigotry.
I (along with everyone else in the thread) have condemned the assault. Repeatedly. You've just gone 'fucking identity politics bullshit' and dodged every response.
It's getting mad. We won't be able to call people n*****s next.
Because you are completely misrepresenting my argument. Repeatedly and deliberately. And your links were shit.What the hell is this mad, mad shit. How are such a large number of people so far down the rabbit-hole.
Why could belboid not comprehend the meaning of the links I shared earlier? How many instances of rabid pirhana-pack mentality and flagrant abuses of decency do the ID-pol kiddies need to perform before the eponymous 'call-out culture' is turned on them?
How in bloody fuck have we got so-called socialists supporting three individuals physically assaulting a woman, something they would entirely condemn if everything else were entirely equal but those three individuals self-identified as men?
Can you imagine calling women "sluts" when discussing issues around rape convictions? Or referring to black people with the N word when discussing stop and search? Language choices absolutely matter.Yeah gender pronouns are more important than physical assault
Fuck off you lying bigoted shit.You just want to self-identify as a woman so you can twat women, edvidently
Because you are completely misrepresenting my argument. Repeatedly and deliberately. And your links were shit.
very true. sometimes they're also used instrumentally in arguments to deflect attention from the real issues, such as a woman being punched in the face after being assaulted by three self-identified women who physically had the strength of menCan you imagine calling women "sluts" when discussing issues around rape convictions? Or referring to black people with the N word when discussing stop and search? Language choices absolutely matter.
I don't get your nastiness. I really don't. What the fuck have you got against people, and why?This is a bit... cult like, isn't it. Agree with our assertions in spite of the observable facts or you're a wrong un.
Where as you coming along to rescue gender dysphoric men is genuine chivalry
Fuck offthere's no misrepresentation here. you are defending the use of no-platform tactics against some cranky radfems. do i have to repeat this all night? these kind of opinions, now current on the left, are fucking appalling and utterly indefensible. maybe in 10 years time after the ID-pol idiots have more solidly discredited themselves and burned through their left support, you'll look back and feel ashamed of this kind of mad positioning.
Do you agree MM is a reactionary TERF who goes out looking for trouble?Can we just agree that some punchy little oik (no gender pronouns) went out looking for trouble and didn't stop till they found some?
And, in the process, set back the transgender cause and further solidified the reasons why some feminists have a problem with m/f transgenders?
I don't think you proved that yet. Though you were asked.Do you agree MM is a reactionary TERF who goes out looking for trouble?