crossthebreeze
Well-Known Member
Martine RothblattThe links you're making in putting this crock of shit together
Name me one trans billionaire
Martine RothblattThe links you're making in putting this crock of shit together
Name me one trans billionaire
actually maybe multi millionaire not billionaire - valued at $340 million last year apparentlyMartine Rothblatt
Flat earthers say that a flat earth is a statement of the obvious. You need to evidence claims not just speculate wildly based on nothing.
I reckon if the medical industry wanted to exploit trans people, then therapy for life and the corresponding medication would make them more money.
Well if that was all you said then I'm not even sure why you felt the need to say it.I don’t need evidence to state that a for-profit medical system will seek to exploit a profit opportunity; its axiomatic. To be honest I don’t get your reaction to this - you’re talking about lifelong medication in your post here.
Anything which demands large amounts of surgery over several years and then follow-up multi-meds for the rest of someone's life is a hugely lucrative opportunity for a private healthcare system. When the likes of Cosmo or Vogue embrace transgender - as they have, with great enthusiasm - it sure ain't for political reasons revolving around personal liberation, that's obvious.
Both parties? I'm trying to get her to show her working on this. So not both parties.To be honest, the ethics of modern medicine and the implications of Big Pharma are complex and milt-faceted and do not merit being boiled down into the simplistic soundbites both parties are employing here.
Well if that was all you said then I'm not even sure why you felt the need to say it.
This is what you actually said, or have you decided to retract your previous statement!
I was responding to a post which quoted doctors in the US talking about how their treatment was in effect being led by the demands or desires of their youthful patients and pointing out that there’s money to be made in indulging those desires and demands so there’s no motive at all to question them and obvious motives for not doing so.
It’s clearly not a suggestion that every gender-related medical need is fraudulent but I’m getting used to this sort of response.
What? Asking for evidence when someone makes a bullshit claim? Sorry but that's what usually happens on Urban.
To be honest, the ethics of modern medicine and the implications of Big Pharma are complex and milt-faceted and do not merit being boiled down into the simplistic soundbites both parties are employing here.
The point being it's an absurd distractionary argument being fielded that has absolutely no bearing on anything else we're talking about, and why on earth we should be debating whether medical companies make money from trans people or not, it's utterly banal unless we're going to start bringing up every industry that makes money off people full stop.
It's a distraction because it's not about trans it's about big pharma, but it does appear to be a suggestion that people are being encouraged to become trans by big pharma so they can make a profit. I see no evidence for this, so have you got some?It came up on another posters post, not mine. There’s a profit motive involved, whys that so irrelevant? Why can’t I comment? I’m really not understanding this reaction.
Indeed not, as a survey of the contents pages of jama facial plastic surgery confirmsAnd my point that the drugs, which are cheap, which big pharma will not be making a huge profit them, and that far from huge amounts of surgery being necessary, many, maybe even most, trans people don't have surgery at all. And what is on offer is often facial surgery. Not just trans people have facial surgery.
Cuz it's boring. .
told you it was fucking boring.
segregate yerselves from life
Speaking of which, aren't you supposed to be dying or somethin, Pongalong?
Takin your bleedin time, aren't you?
Who is this then? I wonder whether this is your first post on this threadSpeaking of which, aren't you supposed to be dying or somethin, Pongalong?
Takin your bleedin time, aren't you?
Since you're here though, bimble,
bimble said: ↑
Things are changing fast, kids are going on tumblr and identifying as trans for reasons totally different from what might have motivated folks years ago, I hope its ok to acknowledge this.
What reasons were people giving years ago, and what is changing do you think?
she also has quite a number who're constantly switching what they feel comfortable with in terms of their 'gender identity' - whatever that means to them.
If you don't know what it means to them, doesn't that make this a story about nothing?
I think I should say that what led me here was the reaction to/subsequent treatment of Helen Steele during/after the anarchist bookfair.
I don't know how we progress at all, once you/one make enemies of people like her.
I can tell you my worries, if that's helpful?
My daughter is 12. She has friends who are *just* being 12 but she also has quite a number who're constantly switching what they feel comfortable with in terms of their 'gender identity' - whatever that means to them.
The very obvious change is *the internet* - whether it leads you to the right place, or just the place that's right *right now* has got to be factored in, doesn't it?
Honestly, I am worried.
If you don't agree with Scientology does that mean the ideology that scientologists ascribe to doesn't exist?If you don't know what it means to them, doesn't that make this a story about nothing?