bimble
floofy
yay ! I love crude graphics.Its from "the GENDER book". It says on the graphic that its by Mel Reiff Hill (one of the authors of the book) adapted from an original idea by Josephine Tittsworth.
yay ! I love crude graphics.Its from "the GENDER book". It says on the graphic that its by Mel Reiff Hill (one of the authors of the book) adapted from an original idea by Josephine Tittsworth.
Here Pengaleng, Sea Star, you are officially an ideology. How does that feel? Indeed, how would you know you were one? maybe Bungle kanes!
Some are, some are very specific as to the definitions. It pays to keep an open mind on what people might mean, dogmatists are like vegans anyway, if they want you to know they are specifically trying to distance themselves from certain language they will soon tell you. Google the terms.
Currently orthodoxy is that transsexuals are part of the transgender community. You might find this graphic helpful:
Quite often I've assumed a far right person to be a TERF because of what they say to me - and only realised my mistake when i checked their account - that's how similar they sound when asking questions that they don;t need answers to to a trans woman. How the far right transphobes approach trans now seems to be much in the same vein as how they approached LGB except now they try to appear LGB friendly while attempting to persuade LGB people to reject the T. I see people falling for it too, sadly.This is a tactic often used by the right when they are trying to make racist or homophobic or misogynist views acceptable in places where they know they will be met with strong opposition if they argue their views openly. “I’m not saying that there’s a link between race and IQ, necessarily but I think we should be able to debate scientific questions openly and without people being shouted down” etc.
What’s difference between trans sexual and trans gender? I’ve drawn possibly an arbitry distinction But are people using the terms interchangeably?.
Currently orthodoxy is that transsexuals are part of the transgender community. You might find this graphic helpful:
meanwhile, back on planet earth....The defenders of the New Orthodoxy get in a real bind when any of this stuff comes up in debate. On the one hand it’s absolutely part of the orthodoxy itself that to debate with “transphobia” is by definition transphobic so the only response they’re really allowed is to chant simplistic mantras and slurs at anyone who isn’t fully signed up. But on the other hand they can see how this alienates the unconverted or ‘ignorant’ majority outside of their tiny political bubbles so they feel obliged to join debate.
Taking the yellow text at the bottom literally, that would seem to cover a hell of a lot of people.
Taking the yellow text at the bottom literally, that would seem to cover a hell of a lot of people.
You ever seen anyone raise that question from anything other than an already-racist pov? I haven't.The fact that IQ tests have a cultural bias, such that they discriminate against minorities seems like a legitimate subject for debate to me, depending on who raises it and how. Surely, it's not the topic that's verboten, but the motivation?
meanwhile, back on planet earth....
Yes. I would say so. The Wikipedia entry seems to back it up.
is it peer reviewed tho?
Anyone still clinging to those theories, or even just posing them as a topic of discussion, if they have also read the debunking, is either being dishonest or experiencing a huge degree of cognitive dissonance due to the unacknowledged fact that they really really really want it to be true.
Albeit with words like "may" and "infrequently"
Tara Wood has been charged with 'assault by beating' and will be appearing at Westminster Magistrate's Court on Feb 15th.
"infrequently" does not mean "incorrectly".
I just don't know how to keep rebutting ignorant crap like this. But really - trans people die younger than any other group of people, have serious mental health issues caused by the situation we're in, a high suicide rate, comparable to people who live in oppressive regimes, are often considered unemployable just because they are trans, and so are more likely to be in poverty, more likely to be homeless (and get treated like shit, often excluded from shelters when homeless), more likely to be sexually assaulted than cis women and with almost no provision for care if we are. Many of us end up stuck in abusive relationships with no means to escape. We often get stuck in this situation that while we live as one gender, we only need a small thing to wrong in our lives for us to end up relying on others who then may misgender us, reject us, treat us as a different gender where we may be harmed. The right to gender based protections that most women of my generation have taken for granted are just not there for trans women. And yet we are subject to misogyny, sexism, transphophobia and homophobia, which can and does kill people. I'm just gobsmacked that you think we have no material struggles.But Trans, albeit facing struggles of their own, haven’t faced the struggles that women have. It isn’t just about looking like or thinking like a woman (whatever that is). It’s material struggles.
For me it’s this:
Supporting feminism based on improving the material conditions of women as a class furthers the struggle for socialism.
The opposing argument is bolstering individualism and liberalism.
In case anyone wondered.
Wow! TERFs not pro abortion anyone? Yes - just why are they trying to cause a split in the Irish feminist movement right now? Hmmmmm.
I don't like or agree with Janice Raymond, and I think that abortion pills are important in certain situations, but i don't think the text linked to in that tweet can in any way be described as pro forced birth/anti-abortion. It talks positively about suction abortions and the last line is a concern that these type of abortion services are under threat. I can't see that being concerned about the safety or efficacy of a drug or cynical of pharmaceutical companies motives is the same as wanting people to suffer from the condition that the drug has been developed to relieve.
I just don't know how to keep rebutting ignorant crap like this. But really - trans people die younger than any other group of people, have serious mental health issues caused by the situation we're in, a high suicide rate, comparable to people who live in oppressive regimes, are often considered unemployable just because they are trans, and so are more likely to be in poverty, more likely to be homeless (and get treated like shit, often excluded from shelters when homeless), more likely to be sexually assaulted than cis women and with almost no provision for care if we are. Many of us end up stuck in abusive relationships with no means to escape. We often get stuck in this situation that while we live as one gender, we only need a small thing to wrong in our lives for us to end up relying on others who then may misgender us, reject us, treat us as a different gender where we may be harmed. The right to gender based protections that most women of my generation have taken for granted are just not there for trans women. And yet we are subject to misogyny, sexism, transphophobia and homophobia, which can and does kill people. I'm just gobsmacked that you think we have no material struggles.
ok - i stand corrected.Yes, the piece is scaremongering about an important method of abortion, but it’s not doing so from a lifer perspective.
I might not be understanding ting, but this seems clear to me:
"Materialism. ... Materialism is a form of philosophical monism which holds that Matter is the fundamental substance in nature, and that all things, including mental aspects and consciousness, are results of material interactions"
You ever seen anyone raise that question from anything other than an already-racist pov? I haven't.
There's a decent parallel between the Bell Curve nonsense and some of the theories brought up on this thread.
The 'science' behind the Bell Curve's conclusions has been thoroughly debunked, to such an extent that the authors of that racist piece of drivel almost did us a favour by collecting the data to help debunk their conclusions. The conclusions they reached are entirely untenable once you've been through the debunking - we had a thread on it here a few years ago linking to the various ways that the data should be analysed - so much so that we are able to claim the opposite with a huge degree of confidence based on that very same data: there is no link between race and intelligence.
It is similar on here with Blanchard's mad - and at root homophobic, among other prejudices - theories about transgender. Anyone still clinging to those theories, or even just posing them as a topic of discussion, if they have also read the debunking, is either being dishonest or experiencing a huge degree of cognitive dissonance due to the unacknowledged fact that they really really really want it to be true.
How does your reasoning apply to women as a class but not transgender people? Genuine question, in good humour.Wer’re All separate now. Individuals with their own materialist struggles.
I haven’t said you have no material struggles. But the fact you place you place your identity struggle above any class struggle proves the point I was making.