Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Scottish independence referendum polling thread

"Should Scotland be an independent country?"

  • Yes

    Votes: 43 66.2%
  • No

    Votes: 17 26.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 4.6%

  • Total voters
    65
  • Poll closed .
It's an entirely predictable response, no? Offer something approaching 'devomax', or certainly 'devomore'. Whatever the result of the referendum, this is a result for everyone wanting more devolution.

Maybe, if you've in Government...and a member of the cabinet etc....but Brown talking about what Labour want to rush through? Wtf...how stupid do they think folk are?
 
No campaign are offering a Devo max package now to stop the Yes momentum which includes control over some welfare inc housing benefit, 1.7 billion, if that happens, then Universal Credit can't work in Scotland as it is wrapped up in with JSA, etc when calculating levels of benefit.
 
Last edited:
Maybe, if you've in Government...and a member of the cabinet etc....but Brown talking about what Labour want to rush through? Wtf...how stupid do they think folk are?
He's not. He's talking about something this tory govt wants to rush through. As I understand it, Brown's proposal has cross-party support in Westminster. I agree that it smacks of panic, but it looks like a genuine concession. Some form of devomax isn't on the ballot, but it is on the agenda now.

It is quite a bizarre situation - Labour will be drafting the legislation, but with tory backing.
 
He's not. He's talking about something this tory govt wants to rush through. As I understand it, Brown's proposal has cross-party support in Westminster. I agree that it smacks of panic, but it looks like a genuine concession. Some form of devomax isn't on the ballot, but it is on the agenda now.

It is quite a bizarre situation - Labour will be drafting the legislation, but with tory backing.
It certainly has whiff of panic about it, and is so patronising as to be almost unbelievable. Irrespective of any promised concession, for a government to abdicate policy to the opposition and attempt to pass off policy as Labour's should be signal enough that a Yes vote is essential to break the system for good.

Pretty shameful & desperate stuff.
 
Their past ones have the exact same DK figure or even higher - 27% in july!. There's 6% rise for YES and a 6% drop for NO (but not that large a fall as it was from a previous rise). But that DK is so high it muddies the water.
YouGov (and Panelbase) on the other hand have DK values of ~10% so that's not a common factor between the two organisations that have shown a move to yes.
 
theres no reason for a border crises. If people want to move to scotland like what they already do, then they will. Where is the necessity for an internal border here? For some reason I just don't see some mass english immigration into scotland in the case of indy. Why would their be? How would there be? it's not like hordes of min wage zero hour contract workers are going to flock to scotland to sign on in slightly less hostile environs for claimants.
All it takes is for the Daily Mail to find out a couple of suspected terrorists to come to London via Prestwick and the Tories especially will be playing saloon bar politics and call for getting tough on border policies. The other problem is that new EU member states have to sign up to Schengen and it is unlikely that the EU establishment which takes a dim view of separatism is going to do Salmond any favours. The chances of Westminster tolerating an open border with the Schengen area are next to nil.
 
It certainly has whiff of panic about it, and is so patronising as to be almost unbelievable. Irrespective of any promised concession, for a government to abdicate policy to the opposition and attempt to pass off policy as Labour's should be signal enough that a Yes vote is essential to break the system for good.

Pretty shameful & desperate stuff.
Even more desperate, they still haven't got their stories straight. Ed Balls has been saying this evening that there isn't cross party agreement on enhanced devolution. And he seems quite emphatic.

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-09-08/no-cross-party-manifesto-on-powers-for-scotland/
 
He's not. He's talking about something this tory govt wants to rush through. As I understand it, Brown's proposal has cross-party support in Westminster. I agree that it smacks of panic, but it looks like a genuine concession. Some form of devomax isn't on the ballot, but it is on the agenda now.

It is quite a bizarre situation - Labour will be drafting the legislation, but with tory backing.


with ten days before decision day they've left it a it late to start offering real stuff rather than telling scotland what they can't have in the event of a yes!
 
with ten days before decision day they've left it a it late to start offering real stuff rather than telling scotland what they can't have in the event of a yes!
And we can't emphasise this enough: hundreds of thousands of postal votes have already been cast!
 
BxCS1nnIIAAlMqD.jpg:large
 
One possible reason they might find to exempt Scotland from Shengen might be monetary union with the fUK. That Chomsky link spoke about this - how, effectively, the eurozone's economic policies are dictated by the Bundesbank. But the UK's aren't, and I would think that quite an easy case could be made for Scotland maintaining an open border only with the country whose central bank will be dictating its monetary policy. If the UK stands up for this, and it will, the rest of the EU will allow it.
 
They do... until they don't. If the vote is yes, expect to see this rule waived with some expedient reason for an exemption found.

What is an independent Scotland's leverage and who would grant it favours?

There is no love for seperatism among most member states. And certainly not Brussels where the quivalent of the SNP is virtually a neo-Fascist party that wants Belgium completely dissolved. States which have their own seperatist movements like Spain and Italy have no reason to give the SNP an easy time. If Salmond is concerned Westminster will play hardball he hasn't seen the half of it. Schengen wouldn't do Scotland much harm anyway but it they think a future Tory Tea Party led by May or Johnson wouldn't close the border think again.

Also 85 per cent of the UK would still be in tact and will survive another day its Scotland that is in for a rocky ride.

You're not sure why the threat of border guards where none are necessary gets people's backs up?

Why would border guards get up the backs of nationalists?
 
Last edited:
What is an independent Scotland's leverage and who would grant it favours?

It wouldn't just be the leverage of Scotland but the rest of the UK aswell. Both politically and logistically, a manned border is something both the UK and Scotland would want to avoid and would be unpopular. But any UK government would find it very difficult politically to have an open border with a Schengen country due to immigration fears so either way forcing Scotland to join Schengen would increase the risk of UK withdrawal, something the EU definitely doesn't want.
 
It wouldn't just be the leverage of Scotland but the rest of the UK aswell. Both politically and logistically, a manned border is something both the UK and Scotland would want to avoid and would be unpopular. But any UK government would find it very difficult politically to have an open border with a Schengen country due to immigration fears so either way forcing Scotland to join Schengen would increase the risk of UK withdrawal, something the EU definitely doesn't want.

If Ireland has an opt out from Schengen then why couldn't an independent Scotland have one?
 
The UK and Ireland opted out of the Schengen when it was signed but new member states are obliged to join. It is similar with the Euro, the UK and Denmark were able to opt out of their obligation to join at the time of the Maastricht treaty but new member states are theoretically obliged to adopt the Euro, although that is harder to enforce.
 
What are you (two) suggesting here?

All that's happened is that the vile Ashcroft has made a crap joke. It doesn't effect the results the professional pollsters that he hires come up with (and they haven't even done one for Scottish independence).
 
What are you (two) suggesting here?

All that's happened is that the vile Ashcroft has made a crap joke. It doesn't effect the results the professional pollsters that he hires come up with (and they haven't even done one for Scottish independence).
I understand it's a joke. But the subtext is "you can't trust the accuracy of my polls", despite the lengths he went to recently to explain why his had the best validity. He is saying: "my polls are not designed to elicit truthful responses".

Now I'm well aware that his polls are just as valid as any well designed poll, but his joke undermines the perception.
 
What are you (two) suggesting here?

All that's happened is that the vile Ashcroft has made a crap joke. It doesn't effect the results the professional pollsters that he hires come up with (and they haven't even done one for Scottish independence).
What Danny said really. In terms of the public face of the game Ashcroft is playing, he should probably keep it zipped given that he's commissioning the polls. I'd go slightly further than what Danny said in fact, thesubtext is 'I don't like the results of my poll, so I ask you not to believe it'.
 
I understand it's a joke. But the subtext is "you can't trust the accuracy of my polls", despite the lengths he went to recently to explain why his had the best validity. He is saying: "my polls are not designed to elicit truthful responses".

Now I'm well aware that his polls are just as valid as any well designed poll, but his joke undermines the perception.
He hasn't done any polls on Scotland that could possibly be undermined - he hasn't done any polls on scotland that could "my polls are not designed to elicit truthful responses" could possibly refer to. The subtext is not what you suggest - it's far more nakedly political and it's that the unionists who are supposed to be defending the union - esp those ion his party - are caving under pressure to such an extent that even YES voters can now squeeze something out of them. It's got nothing to do with polls or pollsters or how they operate. And it most certainly is not saying anything about the way that his polls are designed. Far too much reading-in being done here i think.
 
What Danny said really. In terms of the public face of the game Ashcroft is playing, he should probably keep it zipped given that he's commissioning the polls. I'd go slightly further than what Danny said in fact, thesubtext is 'I don't like the results of my poll, so I ask you not to believe it'.
He's not done any polls.
 
Back
Top Bottom