You are a football person? Why is other team enemy?Okay, heads up. I'm a Manchester City fan, doesn't mean I cant appreciate the enemy United and Liverpool.
Likewise, I'm an anticapitalist, but when it comes to imperialism and the spreading of the capitalist mode of production, who has been a bigger player than Britain?
" Charlie the Third will no be needed. ."A Choppin' for Charlie the Third.
You are sort of amusing. But not much.and celebrating social revolution? I can understand why the capitalists wouldn't want to.
"the end of the divine right of kings -" bingo. Created the paradigm for bourgeois revolutions?
couldn't agree more mate. Couldn't agree more. However, it's been 370 years and the capitalist bastards are still in power. So when it comes to imperialism and the spreading of the capitalist mode of production, who has been a bigger player than Britain?
we have enough third-rate charlies" Charlie the Third will no be needed. ."
how surprising that on 29/1/1649 none of this existed but lo and behold as soon as the axe swung down on whitehall on 30/1/1649 auld relationships were sundered and new ones formed in an effortless immediate transition to capitalism and now auld tt has spoken no more need ever be heard of that tedious brenner debateThe day that made Britain the GREATEST. 30/01/1649.
On 30 January 2019 it will be the 370th anniversary of the greatest day in British history. It should be a day of global celebration, and national pride, but will undoubtably go without mention in the world's media.
That day would turn Britain from an insignificant backwater, to an empire upon which the sun would never set. A 282 year period of world domination. Despite the achievements of Dutch (merchant capitalism), French, Spanish et cetera empires, and even the successful rebellion by the Johnny upstarts of America, NONE would EVER emulate the significance to humanity that Britain achieved. For the Empire however great, was a byproduct of something far more revolutionary.
The axe that fell 30/01/1649 went through more than a neck, it went through the umbilical cord of a new form of society. A society that every country in the world had to emulate, or be raped by.
As the 1st, as the leader, Britain globalised the "British social revolution" and transformed human society on the entire planet. The weakest stood no chance, but even the mightiest, China, fell to the game changer.
To draw an analogy, this game changer is similar to a sports coach changing the tactic in a sport, which just blows away the other competitors. Similarly in Britain, the change in tactics, the change in the way various groups in society interacted with each other, in order to produce/manufacture, was revolutionised.
This NEW society was where the free waged labourer's, were employed by capitalist's, who competed with each other for market share. This competition led to constant innovation in laboursaving techniques, innovation in cost savings, and so laid the basis of the modern economies of today.
On 30 January 1649 Charles I monarch of the three kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland was executed. It's hard to believe chopping off one man's head could change the entire world. But it did. It is the day that made Britain the greatest transformer of human society.
A very tiny synopsis of a massive debate obviously. But a fair assessment?
Jesus didn't cut anyone's head off ya mappet
easier to forgive once you've lopped a head off"Forgive, but never forget."
Anti-capitalist supporting one of the wealthiest clubs on the planet? Nice.Okay, heads up. I'm a Manchester City fan, doesn't mean I cant appreciate the enemy United and Liverpool.
Likewise, I'm an anticapitalist, but when it comes to imperialism and the spreading of the capitalist mode of production, who has been a bigger player than Britain?
he's as much an anti-capitalist as i am a hurling championAnti-capitalist supporting one of the wealthiest clubs on the planet? Nice.
Now you're telling meIt’s possible to be anti-capitalist and appreciate the amazing things that hat have been achieved under the capitalist mode of production.
Sheer barberism, I say.Having spent many hours studying
The History of the Thirty Years’ War by Friedrich Schiller, only the translation. I think this along with the European Reformation may have more effect than some prancing monarch having a very close shave one January morn on the flourish of Capital and free trade?
Sheer barberism, I say.
Yes. Learning how to make fire, use tools, collectively hunt down and scoff the scary mammoth or whatever, use wheel, make little boats, and so on. But capitalist mode of production did bring us the pot noodle.It’s possible to be anti-capitalist and appreciate the amazing things that hat have been achieved under the capitalist mode of production.
Yes. Learning how to make fire, use tools, collectively hunt down and scoff the scary mammoth or whatever, use wheel, make little boats, and so on. But capitalist mode of production did bring us the pot noodle.
I do not like you now, @Sprocket! You chose to ignore my razor-sharp wit re close shave and "barber"ism. This means war, Sir! (Or Madam)I agree, though ultimately the horrors of the war caused by dogmatic religious beliefs repulsed the citizens of Europe to realise they had more in common with each other and allowed political outcomes rather than religious divisions.
I do not like you now, @Sprocket! You chose to ignore my razor-sharp wit re close shave and "barber"ism. This means war, Sir! (Or Madam)
Reminded of ruddy yurts singing 'Freud's a gutterfucker' as he reeled down shaftesbury avenue 30 years ago today after a skinful at the intrepid foxI do not like you now, @Sprocket! You chose to ignore my razor-sharp wit re close shave and "barber"ism. This means war, Sir! (Or Madam)
(departs singing "Freude, schone Gotterfunken. .."