Liberalism and Marxism are both western ideologies. Slavophile dissidents like Solzhenitsyn came to regard Soviet communism as an alien import unsuited to and destructive of Russia's traditions.The world has always been divided into hostile camps. The idea that there ever was a golden age of of peace and cooperation in international affairs is an ahistorical and pre-lapsarian fairy tale.
The sides in the Cold War also weren't from the same ideological stable, even if they both truly wanted world peace, they would have wanted it "on their own terms" as you admit.
Yes, clearly I suggested that if it werre not for the media South Koreans would want to merge with North Korea.Clearly, if it wasn’t for their meddling compliant media they’d be all over the idea of starvation, labour camps and state-regulated haircuts.
Liberalism and Marxism are both western ideologies.
Too right, miserablism is responsible for so much slaughter. Unlike optimism, which did, in the face of miserablist doubters, prove definitively that Iraq could become a western-style liberal democracy with little loss of life, and was behind the massive success of the Ukrainian counter-offensive last year.Miserabilism is the most destructive ideology. Be wary of those who promote it.
Miserablism ≠ healthy scepticism tho.Too right, miserablism is responsible for so much slaughter. Unlike optimism, which did, in the face of miserablist doubters, prove definitively that Iraq could become a western-style liberal democracy with little loss of life, and was behind the massive success of the Ukrainian counter-offensive last year.
The US should get out of places like DIego Garcia and Guantanamo Bay, might be a better case for them staying in places like South Korea where something like 90% of the population wants them there - tbh, if it's going to keep the fucking PRC out of Taiwan, I hope they build more bases
It isn't a huge logical leap that the absence of US military in South Korea could mean reunification under a China-backed North.Yes, clearly I suggested that if it werre not for the media South Koreans would want to merge with North Korea.
There's definitely something in Korean culture which enables North Korea to be particularly fanatical and which also finds expression in South Korea in near-worship of the Chaebols but it's still a bit of a leap to draw an equivalence between North and South Korea.South Korea basically has the same fanatic mindset as North Korea except for capitalism not the cult of the supreme leader
There's definitely something in Korean culture which enables North Korea to be particularly fanatical and which also finds expression in South Korea in near-worship of the Chaebols but it's still a bit of a leap to draw an equivalence between North and South Korea.
Perhaps it’s more the Koreans I’ve been exposed to, but that’s the vibe I picked up from visiting there several times and spending a lot of time with them. Frankly a bunch of nasty bigots.There's definitely something in Korean culture which enables North Korea to be particularly fanatical and which also finds expression in South Korea in near-worship of the Chaebols but it's still a bit of a leap to draw an equivalence between North and South Korea.
Generous. I'd say there's a fair bit of resentment around Chaebols and Korean capitalism in general at the moment... Usual issues around ridiculous work hours, horrendous commutes, sky-high property values. Because, y'know, Koreans are actual people. Also see all the scandals around Chaebols, the impeachment (and imprisonment) Of Park Geun-hye etc.
I mean there definitely are shared characteristics that have favoured paternalistic hierarchies within the sinosphere/neo-confucian states... But yeah, over-simplifying that is er... Problematic let's say.
Perhaps it’s more the Koreans I’ve been exposed to, but that’s the vibe I picked up from visiting there several times and spending a lot of time with them. Frankly a bunch of nasty bigots.
Well aware of the social issues that their “devil takes the hindmost” ultra capitalist society causes.
Hmm. Said something similar about the English the other week and got crucified for it.Perhaps it’s more the Koreans I’ve been exposed to, but that’s the vibe I picked up from visiting there several times and spending a lot of time with them. Frankly a bunch of nasty bigots.
Perhaps it’s more the Koreans I’ve been exposed to,
Or the Chinese might welcome the absence of a hostile military presence, and not want the burden of involvement in a volatile situation, or the civil war that would quite possibly follow an attempt at reunification .It isn't a huge logical leap that the absence of US military in South Korea could mean reunification under a China-backed North.
I've never taken much notice of South Korea, but I do seem to remember 1980s news items about rioting students and a militant labour movement.The people in South Korea have actually had a couple of uprisings. There was an uprising in the late 1940s, and in 1980. It was popular pressure that brought down the dictatorship.
The UK did nothing because the Greek cypriots decided enosis was a brilliant idea and it would be even better if KEBABS were permantly removed unfortunately for this glorious Greek Paradise a very angry neighbour with several airborne divisions turned up to ask some very pointed questionsThere are two huge British military bases in Cyprus.
The UK was a guarantor of the independence of Cyprus, a former British colony.
When the Republic of Türkiye invaded the Republic of Cyprus in 1974, occupying about a third of its territory, the UK did nothing. Forty years later there are still Greek Cypriot people who were expelled from Northern Cyprus who cannot go home. (There are also Turkish Cypriot people displaced from the south who cannot go home). The Republic of Türkiye also settled people from its territory to Northern Cyprus, to change the demographic balance.
British overseas bases, like US overseas bases, primarily exist to defend the economic interests of the ruling classes of those countries, not peace or sovereignty or democracy.