friedaweed
Me and me girl named Jane
and there he goes. Good catch
It's a good wicket that rewards good batting and good bowling. Aus got away from England today. I'm not optimistic that this batting line-up can bat for 200 overs, which is what this will take, minimum. I hope to be surprised... it can happen of course, but to happen twice in a row is a push.Well, I must say that was a rather pleasant day of cricket to watch. I was happy enough with Smith's 118, but to see him brought back after the no-ball was especially gratifying, especially with so many in the crowd still booing him whenever he enters or leaves the field of play. England will rue some of their dropped chances; Jofra's one was really tough, but the catches at mid-on and especially at slip should have been taken. Nice to see the Aussie tail get some runs too. 82 off the last ten overs was a lot of fun.
I'll be interested to see what happens tomorrow. England can't win it from here, but all it will take is one or two nice long partnerships to ensure a draw. The wicket still looks pretty decent for batting, but not so good that the bowlers can't get anything out of it, and Lyon should get some good spin as the match goes on. Looking forward to tomorrow.
Burns is flawed, but he's a proper opener. Unlike either Roy or Denly. I feel a bit sorry for Denly here. He's been sacrificed for the sake of golden boy Roy. But he was awful last night.Hats off for Burns 50. Currently 3rd most runs this series, only godlike weido Smith and Stokes are ahead of him at the moment.
Often looks like he is about to get out but he is digging in earning tough runs.
Chump question: what happens if both this match and the next one are drawn? Who wins the Ashes in that eventuality?
It was certainly fascinating to see Jason Roy's mode of dismissal part-way through the morning session when England needed to bat out the entire day to save the match.
(Source: as stated in image)
England left with red faces after neglecting Test cricket for years
Just for clarity I don't personally think he should play at The Oval, but I won't be surprised if these selectors find an argument not to drop him. In the unlikely event that he smashes a blistering 80 (or even 100) in a losing cause here they'll definitely see that as sufficient evidence to keep him.Can't see Roy playing at the Oval without a big score second innings. Problem is that his second innings is likely to come as part of a blockathon where time matters not runs. So a blistering 80 off 100 balls is just 100 balls. And he doesn't know how to get a dour 50 off 150 balls. He's never done it ever in any cricket.