MightyTibberton
Well-Known Member
they've clearly been effective, but if we can say that the far right's targets range broadly from US style intersectional liberals and social democrats to the far left, then have they really been much cleverer and more active than all those?
e.g. there's been highly visible and energetic movements in support of Sanders & Corbyn and the socdem politics associated with both, and we've had a fair bit of discussion on here about the internet aspect of Corbyn's support and the extent of its influence, which while debatable is surely not insignificant. In both cases large numbers of people have been drawn in and got energised and thats still very apparent in their online presence.
and I don't think anyone could deny the effectiveness of the use of the internet by the intersectional liberal lot. they've built networks of websites and popular personalities, as well as developing extensive and vibrant net cultures especially on social media like tumblr and twitter. the dynamism and 'cultural threat' posed by them is I suppose reflected in the extreme bigoted reaction of stuff like gamergate.
[edited for slightly better phrasing]
Thank you, inva, that's cheering.
It's possible I'm being too gloomy and that that's a function of me looking with dread at the works of the right - and partcularly the numbers of people who follow and engage with right wing (and increasingly with extreme right wing) social media accounts.
I've tried to become more active myself in support of my beliefs now, and that's, in itself, a personally positive step.