ska invita
back on the other side
that's depressing... I thought we'd moved on from the 1930s Olympics mentality.
that's depressing... I thought we'd moved on from the 1930s Olympics mentality.
Not read it but recall mention of this book on that subject: How the Irish Became WhiteDidn't it used to be the case that the Irish weren't considered fully paid-up members of the so-called "White" race?
Yep, W.A.S.P. didn't just exclude Jews.Didn't it used to be the case that the Irish weren't considered fully paid-up members of the so-called "White" race?
from another thread ...
Here you go Athos. As I stated earlier, I will engage with you and you only on here.
Point one:
1 Can you quantify 'regularly'?
2 And show me where he has said he went there 'regularly'?
To the best of my knowledge he has been there once (or possibly twice) in the company of Leftists.
3. I have been to Windsor Park at two Linfield matches. I was in the company of (progressive) people from a loyalist background. Whilst they might be regarded as dangerous radicals in their own community, they would certainly be regarded as reactionary on here. I went there under their guarantees of safety. Does that make me a loyalist? An apologist for loyalism?
Point TWO
The people he visits in Berlin ARE Anarchists/Anarcho-Communists. He is merely distancing himself from Lifestyle Anarchists and fraggle-rockers and saying that culturally, socially, fashion-wise he always had more in common with working class fascists thatn many middle-class trendy lefties. So have I. So have many thousands of people on the political left.
Do you want me to post THAT George Orwell quote again.
POINT 3
They reached that conclusion based on their own prejudices IMO, long before . They remind me of coppers, seizing on everything that 'confirms' their convictions and simply ignoring anything that does not fit their pre-determined beliefs.
It's not new. It's typical of the left.
As for the rest of your post. I disagree with you. But who cares? As I said. I entered this fray cos he was being called out as a fascist and also called a liar - by clowns. I'm sorry if some joined-up thinkers like you were caught in the crossfire.
I am not here to defend his every post. Like I said before , he is big and ugly enough to do that for himself.
It's not a Freudian slip. From the way he says 'I shouldn't say that' it's obviously the way he normally says that name.
Oh how lovely! Across your feed? Who do you know that thinks that's okay?
Go on Facebook. Search for "America's Proud Deplorables."
Oh good god no. I am trying to keep my blood pressure low today.
Didn't it used to be the case that the Irish weren't considered fully paid-up members of the so-called "White" race?
Still plenty of anti Irish feeling around though not always explicitly expressed as in the Country Squire article Eire get stuffed.Punch used to regularly portray the Irish as semi evolved Neandertals well into the 20th century.
Ireland Cartoons - Images | PUNCH Magazine Cartoon Archive
and "No blacks, no dogs, no Irish" signs could be found outside boarding houses in the UK, into the 80s. Some Sun & tabloid headlines post-IRA attacks were akin to Hopkin's anti-Muslim rants.
Still plenty of anti Irish feeling around though not always explicitly expressed as in the Country Squire article Eire get stuffed.
He's asked you to pretty much defend his posts though, over the last few pages. All he keeps saying is 'Liam will back me up'.
Still plenty of anti Irish feeling around though not always explicitly expressed as in the Country Squire article Eire get stuffed.
Those tweets by RS are IMO anti-Irish and completely patronising. 'You Irish people get to be White if you fight Black people on my say so.'
Here's another "gem" that floated across my feed this morning:
All absolutely true - if anything you have understated it. I would also add, jokes about the Irish all being thick were entirely acceptable right to the end of the 70s, and it was only the comedy revolution which changed thatand "No blacks, no dogs, no Irish" signs could be found outside boarding houses in the UK, into the 80s. Some Sun & tabloid headlines post-IRA attacks were akin to Hopkin's anti-Muslim rants.
All absolutely true - if anything you have understated it. I would also add, jokes about the Irish all being thick were entirely acceptable right to the end of the 70s, and it was only the comedy revolution which changed that
I haven't read the book either, it seems to be a worthy academic piece if subject to some disagreement.Not read it but recall mention of this book on that subject: How the Irish Became White
Asad Haider outlines the argument that "white skin privilege" is detrimental to the "white working class" here:I haven't read the book either, it seems to be a worthy academic piece if subject to some disagreement.
The article you link to seems a poor summing up of the argument that the Irish became "white" by forcing blacks out of the shittiest jobs. If that's white privilege you can stick it.