Nigel Irritable
Five, Ten, Fifteen Years
none plausible
None entirely convincing, but none less convincing than applying the term "capitalism" to mean "anything we don't like". But that's for another thread.
none plausible
Wolves poly?Fucking oxbridge. In the 60's it was my beloved Alma Mater got all the best cc seats.
If that is your understanding of the theory nigel, then the education within the SP and the SP(I) is even worse than I thought!None entirely convincing, but none less convincing than applying the term "capitalism" to mean "anything we don't like". But that's for another thread.
Shocking isn't it.And a oxbridge lad went straight to top table at such a young age and after such short membership. This i find hard to believe.
None entirely convincing, but none less convincing than applying the term "capitalism" to mean "anything we don't like". But that's for another thread.
Yeah that sounds about right, time wise.butchersapron
When I was in the Party he was head of SWSS. He became a CC member a few years (2008-9?) after I left, but he can only be about 28 now.
Oxbridge as well is he?Shocking isn't it.
Jo C was similar but I quite like him. He even had a proper job for a couple of months at one point.
Too right. You just missed John Rees describe this episode as "the single biggest implosion of the revolutionary left since the Italian left meltdown of the mid 1970s"I am starting to regret not really being into Facebook.
The implosion that didn't happen.Too right. You just missed John Rees describe this episode as "the single biggest implosion of the revolutionary left since the Italian left meltdown of the mid 1970s"
This isn't the right thread of course as NI says but that's a cracking comment belboid, bang on the money. Just the sort of crass description of state cap that the Millies used to feed their younger members. Anyway enough of this it's indulgent of us all!If that is your understanding of the theory nigel, then the education within the SP and the SP(I) is even worse than I thought!
Cambridge, got a first in physics.Oxbridge as well is he?
If that is your understanding of the theory nigel, then the education within the SP and the SP(I) is even worse than I thought!
And the young one?Cambridge, got a first in physics.
Just know he went to Cambridge.And the young one?
That's terribly undialectical of you fella I'm sure John would say. The implosion is a process, only a hopeless empiricist would take the lack of an implosion so far as evidence of no impending implosion.The implosion that didn't happen.
So not just the biggest on the British left but the world wide left.Too right. You just missed John Rees describe this episode as "the single biggest implosion of the revolutionary left since the Italian left meltdown of the mid 1970s"
That's terribly undialectical of you fella I'm sure John would say. The implosion is a process, only a hopeless empiricist would take the lack of an implosion so far as evidence of no impending implosion.
Like trotsky and ww3 - he's not wrong, it's just that it hasn't happened yet.That's terribly undialectical of you fella I'm sure John would say. The implosion is a process, only a hopeless empiricist would take the lack of an implosion so far as evidence of no impending implosion.
Oh feck was he, of course yeah I see now why he'd say that, my bad.You're getting a bit Zhou Enlai and the French Revolution here. He's talking about the Italian left "implosion" of the 70s.
none of which is really consistent with what you said before, but, yeah, another time, another thread.No, I'm quite familiar with Cliff's "theory", and its revisions, and a number of other "state capitalist" theories, some predating his, and find none of them even slightly convincing. Trotsky, Shachtman, Ticktin, etc have all produced theoretical frameworks with more explanatory power. However, while I broadly lean towards Trotsky's view, as expanded into "Proletarian Bonapartism", I don't find any of the main theories entirely convincing on every issue and aspect, and tend to agree with Jim Higgins' observation that all of the various "theories" of Stalinism have generally been better at pointing out the flaws in other theories than they have at providing their own unassailable accounts.
I've always found that the mark of the very stupidest SWP members has been a conviction that "State Capitalism" has provided their organisation with the secret keys to the universe. It's almost always accompanied by a broad ignorance of the detail of Cliff's (contradictory) theories and a near total ignorance of any other theory.
But as I've said above, this is really something for another thread as it's the kind of classic set piece argument that could go on for thirty pages here with nobody changing their minds.
What/which implosion?You're getting a bit Zhou Enlai and the French Revolution here. He's talking about the Italian left "implosion" of the 70s.
What/which implosion?
Well yeah I thought it telling that he sees the swp as THAT important.So not just the biggest on the British left but the world wide left.
That's what they taught him. It's what they taught you. What party are you both in?Well yeah I thought it telling that he sees the swp as THAT important.
Stuck in a bubble the lot of them and that include the opposition.Well yeah I thought it telling that he sees the swp as THAT important.
none of which is really consistent with what you said before, but, yeah, another time, another thread.
Ohhh, but it does, because.......Even now that it doesn't really fucking matter very much.
It is a little like Joyce and his obsession with the Catholic Church he'd 'left' I grant you.That's what they taught him. It's what they taught you. What party are you both in?