He is still currently MP for Neath.Ok. But I was thinking people might be appalled that an ex MP who voted for the Iraq war and voted against a public enquiry into the war is coming. Has no one mentioned this? The guy has got blood on his hands.
He is still currently MP for Neath.Ok. But I was thinking people might be appalled that an ex MP who voted for the Iraq war and voted against a public enquiry into the war is coming. Has no one mentioned this? The guy has got blood on his hands.
And you don't think the ISN and SWP might end up working together in the same campaigns?
Hocus Eye said:He is talking about South Africa and his part in fighting apartheid there. He was not a NewLabour/blue labour robot in those days. He was a member of the Liberal Party then and known as a 'radical'
more than 'some' history. Hain was one of the original ANL signatories back in the seventies, and one of its most prominent(non-SWP) campaignes. He joined again on the relaunch, iirr. He used to speak at meetings, in anti-nazi & SA stuff, but was allowed to drift off when the party started being able to get actual South Africans along to speak. He's not been invited back earlier, most likely due to his support for the war.i just don't get what is actually being said there, or why it's all smoke and mirrors. i can't really see how the SWP could be making life harder for him now than when he was still in.
Hain is also a longstanding supporter of UAF, and one of the SWP's big 'connections' in certain political circles. at the closing rally of Marxism one year, Delta actually spoke about being briefed with info regarding the QT UAF demo in Hain's office iirc, so i think the party connections have some history.
Ok. But I was thinking people might be appalled that an ex MP who voted for the Iraq war and voted against a public enquiry into the war is coming. Has no one mentioned this? The guy has got blood on his hands.
more than 'some' history. Hain was one of the original ANL signatories back in the seventies, and one of its most prominent(non-SWP) campaignes. He joined again on the relaunch, iirr. He used to speak at meetings, in anti-nazi & SA stuff, but was allowed to drift off when the party started being able to get actual South Africans along to speak. He's not been invited back earlier, most likely due to his support for the war.
that is one of the more interesting looking meetings, tbh. Certainly more interesting than ones by such big name speakers as, uhh, Joseph Choonara or Sally Campbell.
& is it just me, or is the Speakers page now completely (Paul Le) blank? http://www.marxismfestival.org.uk/speakers.htm
I'll keep my ears open and I'll look out for the Irish paper though I usually do grab a copy if I spot one.Will there be the usual Irish delegation going over? If so, it will be interesting to see if any of the Irish lot weigh in on issues of controversy.
I think it would be better for them if they did split off completely - better for the fight against fascism if they make it clear that they are no part of the SWP."Weyman Bennett, joint National Secretary of Unite Against Fascism (pc) will speak on
From the EDL to BNP: How do we stop fascism today?"
PC? It's almost as if they are pretending the UAF is an independent organisation
I think it would be better for them if they did split off completely - better for the fight against fascism if they make it clear that they are no part of the SWP.
I think it would be better for them if they did split off completely - better for the fight against fascism if they make it clear that they are no part of the SWP.
I am surprised anyone had the commitment to listen that long to thatDid someone already comment on this? The opening page advert for Marxism 2013: last year's opening rally with an inspiring speaker about one hour in. http://marxismfestival.org.uk/
Well I hope they do get involved, but if past experience is anything to go by, I doubt it.Last Friday I spoke to a long time SWP member, who I haven't seen for years and years; in the past he has always been happy to defend the party against all criticism.
Unsurprisingly, I had him down as a super loyalist and so was encouraged when he told me that he had resigned - as he put it from the party not from being active - and that from his perspective those who are still in are 'only the 50 something men'.
He had subsequently been approached by the Socialist Party as a potential recruit; but he hadn't been convinced by what he heard of their disputes procedures when he enquired about them.
He seemed quite happy not to be in a party...which surprised me given his decades long commitment to the SWP and its particular brand of Leninism.
What do I take from all this?
If the SWP has lost people like this, and lost them so completely, then it is curtains for them; long drawn out curtains certainly, but it is over in any meaningful sense.
If a long time Leninist can get to grips with life outside 'the party' (whichever party that is) then there are a whole layer of people out there, with skill and experience to draw on, who can usefully contribute to a pro-working class politics; that doesn't mean that they necessarily will but there is a potential there.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
he did three Hail Mary's.Btw, did he, the SWP guy, show any contrition for the damage the SWP has done to progressive politics?
:-*Oh god, here we go.
pretending?"Weyman Bennett, joint National Secretary of Unite Against Fascism (pc) will speak on
From the EDL to BNP: How do we stop fascism today?"
PC? It's almost as if they are pretending the UAF is an independent organisation
I am surprised anyone had the commitment to listen that long to that
I don't think young people really want to be part of a party they see as out of touchHow can they when the purpose of the UAF is to channel the young to the SWP.
I don't think young people really want to be part of a party they see as out of touch
Young people & they are the ones that will declare independence & I hope they do so - us oldies have made a complete fuck up of thingsSo what people are we on about - who is going to declare independence here?
Not being associated with a party that can treat abused women abominably & I say that as a member of the SWP though the way things are going not for much longer, I'm only hanging till I see how they deal with any questions that come up at marxism this year & I suspect I'm not the only one, I think a lot of young people have already voted with their feet so to speak.In what way?
If they don't get new members they will stagnate and become much more irrelevant, much as the SWP is becoming, without new ideas there is no growth and the old guard will look out of touch. When you are perceived as out of touch that is what you will eventually becomeThey aren't running UAF though. The old people are. Who is going to declare UDI?