Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

Hillarious minutes from the latest ISN Steering Committee meeting http://www.internationalsocialistne...minutes/114-2013-05-13-steering-cttee-minutes

There's some real gems but this is by far the best

  • It was agreed we start from the position that everything we say is for everyone in the organisation to hear, if not it has to be raised and agreed.
  • It was pointed out that sometimes the minutes could be too exhaustive. Keith F pointed out that it would be difficult, for instance to call Alex Callinicos a wanker on the Steering Committee without it being made public in the minutes.
 
The remaining dissidents look like they are starting to move again. Here's a discussion document from Mike Gonzalez:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/141977026...achers-2?secret_password=2ecnhcy9zk0z2fgp8x8s

It's of interest less because of its argument and more because the tone it takes indicates that previous "soft" oppositionists are very hostile to the leadership.
This piece is very good. It outlines the idea that he party is key and superior to the class in short simple terms.
 
It was pointed out that sometimes the minutes could be too exhaustive. Keith F pointed out that it would be difficult, for instance to call Alex Callinicos a wanker on the Steering Committee without it being made public in the minutes.
 
Tommy Sheridan to speak at Marxism......... along with Jane Aitchison (not known outside PCS but purged from DWP Group Presidency after leaving the Socialist Party in a bit of a huff).
 
Tommy Sheridan to speak at Marxism......... along with Jane Aitchison (not known outside PCS but purged from DWP Group Presidency after leaving the Socialist Party in a bit of a huff).

That's a perfectly sensible way of putting it if by 'purged' you mean lost the Left Unity (PCS broad left) election.
 
Has anyone been following Jack Conrad podcasts and the Weekly Worker?

http://www.cpgb.org.uk/home/podcasts/may-19-2013-special-report-on-left-unity-and-swp

Heavy space devoted 3 documents (some discussed above)

http://www.cpgb.org.uk/home/weekly-worker/online-only/swp-opposition-signs-of-life

with an almost wilfully mangled picture of Ian Birchall::hmm:

IanBirchall.jpg
 
I thought it might be referring to labour but the context certainly implies the SWP, a very messy paragraph that one.

Just to be clear, he is saying 1992 Kinnockist Labour is like the 2012 SWP in terms of composition:

Fast forward 20 years and it is a painful exercise to ask how much of Kimber’s polemic now applies to us: “Nor is the party just older. Its class base has shifted. A party which was once composed largely of workers is now dominated by well-intentioned members of the new middle class. They are committed to Labour ideas, but they are not in the main rooted in the workplaces and housing where most working class people, and most Labour voters, spend their time. Just one in four members are manual workers. Only 17 percent live in council houses compared with 25 percent of the whole population and 39 percent of Labour voters. There are as many Labour members in the lecturers’ union NATFHE (membership 70,000) as there are members in the public employees’ NUPE section of the UNISON union (membership 580,000)…”
 
A bit unnecessary, don't you think articul8?

Meanwhile, the ISN continue to butter up the faultlines people:
internationalsocialistnetwork.org/index.php/ideas-and-arguments/organisation/swp-crisis/117-jules-alford-there-are-two-swp-oppositionsfaul
 
Link messed up Nigel.

Here


Good central point on the functioning of the SWP:

In the top-down internal regime of the SWP the only significant debate allowed is the one that takes place among the CC and these comrades are regarded as indispensable, as in the case of 'Comrade Delta'. So ‘leadership’ becomes a sinecure rather than something that is constantly contested and renewed and as the full-timers function as a transmission belt for the CC’s directives, the party becomes ossified and sectarian. This arrogance inevitably alienates those we worked alongside as happened in Stop the War, Respect and Unite Against Fascism. Gonzalez restates the need for a revolutionary politics that is the product of a culture of controversy and debate, of “permanent and active collaboration among all its members” including the newest party members.

But where will the newest party members come from. I see no one particularly joining although there is a sense of hyper activity at all costs within the branches.
 
wtf is Hicks doing on there. Samir Amin is a good catch but usually someone they would not have given his approach. I wouldn't bet your house on either of them being there come the (glorious) day. Other than that..tumbleweed.

And that it a terribly designed program - like some hideous WOMAD thing.
 
wtf is Hicks doing on there. Samir Amin is a good catch but usually someone they would not have given his approach. I wouldn't bet your house on either of them being there come the (glorious) day. Other than that..tumbleweed.

And that it a terribly designed program - like some hideous WOMAD thing.
Even womad has better music than the 'cultural' events
 
Back
Top Bottom