- It was agreed we start from the position that everything we say is for everyone in the organisation to hear, if not it has to be raised and agreed.
- It was pointed out that sometimes the minutes could be too exhaustive. Keith F pointed out that it would be difficult, for instance to call Alex Callinicos a wanker on the Steering Committee without it being made public in the minutes.
This piece is very good. It outlines the idea that he party is key and superior to the class in short simple terms.The remaining dissidents look like they are starting to move again. Here's a discussion document from Mike Gonzalez:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/141977026...achers-2?secret_password=2ecnhcy9zk0z2fgp8x8s
It's of interest less because of its argument and more because the tone it takes indicates that previous "soft" oppositionists are very hostile to the leadership.
Hillarious minutes from the latest ISN Steering Committee meeting http://www.internationalsocialistne...minutes/114-2013-05-13-steering-cttee-minutes
There's some real gems but this is by far the best
A lament, comparing today's SWP to the, alleged, good old days:
http://the-faultlines.blogspot.ie/2013/05/losing-aura-of-competence.html
1 in 4 members is a manual workerA lament, comparing today's SWP to the, alleged, good old days:
http://the-faultlines.blogspot.ie/2013/05/losing-aura-of-competence.html
1 in 4 members is a manual worker
I'm afraid that would be too subtle for me.Is Nigel bigging his sect up with that above post one wonders.
Tommy Sheridan to speak at Marxism......... along with Jane Aitchison (not known outside PCS but purged from DWP Group Presidency after leaving the Socialist Party in a bit of a huff).
This is a quote from a Kimberly article about labour years back1 in 4 members is a manual worker
I thought it might be referring to labour but the context certainly implies the SWP, a very messy paragraph that one.This is a quote from a Kimberly article about labour years back
I thought it might be referring to labour but the context certainly implies the SWP, a very messy paragraph that one.
Fast forward 20 years and it is a painful exercise to ask how much of Kimber’s polemic now applies to us: “Nor is the party just older. Its class base has shifted. A party which was once composed largely of workers is now dominated by well-intentioned members of the new middle class. They are committed to Labour ideas, but they are not in the main rooted in the workplaces and housing where most working class people, and most Labour voters, spend their time. Just one in four members are manual workers. Only 17 percent live in council houses compared with 25 percent of the whole population and 39 percent of Labour voters. There are as many Labour members in the lecturers’ union NATFHE (membership 70,000) as there are members in the public employees’ NUPE section of the UNISON union (membership 580,000)…”
I thought it might be referring to labour but the context certainly implies the SWP, a very messy paragraph that one.
with an almost wilfully mangled picture of Ian Birchall:
Looks like he's been taken in by Yewtree
No, not really *I don't really think Birchall is a sex criminal*You really are vile aren't you?
In the top-down internal regime of the SWP the only significant debate allowed is the one that takes place among the CC and these comrades are regarded as indispensable, as in the case of 'Comrade Delta'. So ‘leadership’ becomes a sinecure rather than something that is constantly contested and renewed and as the full-timers function as a transmission belt for the CC’s directives, the party becomes ossified and sectarian. This arrogance inevitably alienates those we worked alongside as happened in Stop the War, Respect and Unite Against Fascism. Gonzalez restates the need for a revolutionary politics that is the product of a culture of controversy and debate, of “permanent and active collaboration among all its members” including the newest party members.
Even womad has better music than the 'cultural' eventswtf is Hicks doing on there. Samir Amin is a good catch but usually someone they would not have given his approach. I wouldn't bet your house on either of them being there come the (glorious) day. Other than that..tumbleweed.
And that it a terribly designed program - like some hideous WOMAD thing.
quid pro quo - they supported him, so...wtf is Hicks doing on there.
Nasty business that politics - before the election he was at war with them.quid pro quo - they supported him, so...
Interesting that all the debates seem to be between their own members
no Martin Smith playing jazz, for some reason.Even womad has better music than the 'cultural' events