Bolshiebhoy why are you reducing the cases just down to the accusation of Delta raping someone? There is also the issue of a leading party member of nearly 50 years old thinking it is ok to sleep with a 17 year old new member. This leads on to the question that despite this the SWP thinking it was ok to have a panel to investigate comprising solely of his mates, and even then one of the panel obviously thought there was some kind of wrong doing. Delta was also accussed of sexual harassment by a seperate woman. The CC knew of at least the first accusation but allowed conference to be misled and him to have a standing ovation.
There is also the case of the Sheffield organiser who the SWP thought it was ok to give a two year suspension after a number of serious accusations, some of which they accepted. They then went on to praise him, and thought that if they gave him some SWP literature on women's rights that would be enough to welcome him back to the fold.
But you reduce all this down to the fact that some bloke should keep his dick in his trousers? Don't you think that's a bit of a disgusting comment to make given we have two seperate accusations, one of rape, and one of sexual harassment? You say that this in reference to those who believe he is innocent, but by your own logic, how can anyone think this? But despite you not knowing whether he is guily or innocent, and despite the fact that a woman has alleged he raped her, you choose to think it is him just not keeping his dick in his trousers.
As for all the stuff about you thinking it is so important to protect the political tradition of the IS. What has this tradition actually achieved? Doesn't amount to a whole hill of beans it seems to me. After several decades they are a group of 1000 or so activists, with sod all influence in either the unions or working class communities and joke front organisations like Unite the Resistance, which achieve precisely sweet FA. Even historically they haven't exacty set the world on fire.