Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

Worth noting that the hard opposition isn't entirely gone. There are some extremely disgruntled people intending on staying in for the moment.
There are but arguably they really were primarily enraged at the dc cases and not keen on the political direction of Seymour and other Platformists.
 
There are but arguably they really were primarily enraged at the dc cases and not keen on the political direction of Seymour and other Platformists.

Some of them yes, but there are others still in who have "Platform" type views more generally. Some of whom were in the Platform (eg Davidson), some of whom weren't but were close to them on the IDOOP spectrum (and it was a spectrum).
 
Oh right....

anyway, if this new network grows, there will be more resignations

I just hope it all coalesces with all the different groups and we get something like Sryiza
 
It was a spectrum but those left in will have to make a call now. Between their distaste for the regime and their certain knowledge that the ISN will be another centrist swamp outfit. Personalities and egos aside the ISN is just Counterfire II. Fair enough if some of them think the SWP has degenerated to the point where it's become an obstacle but they ned to think long and hard about what they will be jumping to...
 
Scribbling, you sound very unlike the 'typical SWP hack/trotbot, when did you join?

Millbank time?

:eek: :D Did you read any of this thread? :D

He had left in the 1990s around Blair, it would be interesting to hear why and how exactly he left, though.
I disagree with Scribbling on the SWP doing great work by maintaining UAF, I posted this in response to a different new poster, but his analysis of the SWP as a party has been solid.
 
Did we ever clear up why SEYMOUR! claimed to have met the real david rose that hari mocked up?

1. Why do people capitalise his name like that?

2. It could have been Hari sending one of his mates as "David Rose", after having written in him as a master stroke sockpuppet.
 
It was a spectrum but those left in will have to make a call now. Between their distaste for the regime and their certain knowledge that the ISN will be another centrist swamp outfit.

I think you underestimate their ability to stay in and stay disgruntled. Next pre-conference period is six months away and there will be more rows before then. Eventually they'll all be gone, but there's a long way to go yet.
 
It was a spectrum but those left in will have to make a call now. Between their distaste for the regime and their certain knowledge that the ISN will be another centrist swamp outfit. Personalities and egos aside the ISN is just Counterfire II. Fair enough if some of them think the SWP has degenerated to the point where it's become an obstacle but they ned to think long and hard about what they will be jumping to...

It was a spectrum but those left in will have to make a call now. Between their distaste for the regime and their certain knowledge that the ISN will be another centrist swamp outfit. Personalities and egos aside the ISN is just Counterfire II. Fair enough if some of them think the SWP has degenerated to the point where it's become an obstacle but they ned to think long and hard about what they will be jumping to...

They just need to get the f*** out of the SWP, stop being tainted by association with it, and work out the rest of it later.

No more apologies, no more defending the indefensible.

There is political life outside the SWP, despite what the leadership keep telling you.
 
It was a spectrum but those left in will have to make a call now. Between their distaste for the regime and their certain knowledge that the ISN will be another centrist swamp outfit.

I like how you've set the only two possible options for them. There is literally nothing else they can do except stay as SWP (drones while the CC lie and rig the elections) or join the ISN.
 
I reckon that's not far off right to be honest - probably about 2,000 subs paying members, though obviously there's some in that number who aren't especially active. I know we check our branch membership list once a year and take anyone off who hasn't been involved or paid subs over the year unless there's some kind of unusual circumstance that leads us to believe they'll be back.

I'm pretty sure I'm still counted among the SWP membership, despite sending a resignation to the centre. Otherwise I wouldn't still be getting the internal bulletins. That said I think before this shitstorm, even taking into account the questionable membership figures, the SWP were definitely still a fair bit bigger than us. I hadn't realised just how many members they had round here until they packed out a meeting a bit back. There's a section of the membership that you don't generally see at the usual events but who can be mobilised when they really need it and I think that's been the real difference.

You're a shit branch sec, we do ours every 6 months! And Every branch I've been in has been ruthless too-6 months of no subs and no activity and you're off the lists.

Worth remembering that the SP has separate Scottish and NI sections too, while the SWP has British and Irish sections, so a straight comparison is slightly more complicated. Our membership in Scotland is low, but in England and Wales we're definitely over 2000 now.
 
(Me, I just got older, had kids, drifted a bit . Nothing very political. Helped out a bit with Socialist Alliance, sort of politically active elsewhere. After STWC was ready to rejoin, but put off by Respect) .
 
A couple of CC loyalists I know are convinced that Rees and German have been pulling strings in this - and one of the Sheffield oppositionists has joined counterfire. Complete and utter paranoia or might there be an element of truth to it? I don't believe for a second they've been directing it lizard like but it's possible they've had the ear of some of them isn't it?

They will definitely have had some involvement, or tried too. But WHO is this in Sheffield? Spill!
 
I tried to persuade the angry SWP people I spoke to that if it all became completely hopeless that they should try a hostile takeover of Counterfire - that they probably had more folk, and that they plus some of the good people in Counterfire (and surely some of them are pretty ok ?) that they could run the place. This went down like a bucket of sick - so I think hostility to Counterfire as a German/Rees production is genuine, not "tactical" (I don't fully know why, but I haven't really grasped the SWP's internal politics since Respect).

I'm no expert but I believe the SWPers who stayed after Rees and German left, held Rees and German primarily responsible for pushing and expanding the initial moves to "resist" Galloway's expulsion, extend the Lavalette example and form RESPECT. Hence in the catastrophe as RESPECT collapsed and the Left List formed and then was rescinded, then a kind of headless chicken feeling because they had no proper United Front. All this they blamed on the CC figures who 'got us involved with the Gallowayites in the first place'.
 
I'm no expert but I believe the SWPers who stayed after Rees and German left, held Rees and German primarily responsible for pushing and expanding the initial moves to "resist" Galloway's expulsion, extend the Lavalette example and form RESPECT. Hence in the catastrophe as RESPECT collapsed and the Left List formed and then was rescinded, then a kind of headless chicken feeling because they had no proper United Front. All this they blamed on the CC figures who 'got us involved with the Gallowayites in the first place'.

There's an underlying hostility to the style of leadership that Rees and German personify for them. Also, remember that the first big opportunity for people concerned with democracy in the SWP came in the form of the Rees/German factional row. Those proto-oppositionists and the leadership majority united around putting the boot into them.
 
You're a shit branch sec, we do ours every 6 months! And Every branch I've been in has been ruthless too-6 months of no subs and no activity and you're off the lists.

Worth remembering that the SP has separate Scottish and NI sections too, while the SWP has British and Irish sections, so a straight comparison is slightly more complicated. Our membership in Scotland is low, but in England and Wales we're definitely over 2000 now.

My approach is generally do as little as possible and hope for the best. It's served me well in all other areas of my life so I'm fucked if I'm breaking a habit of a lifetime just for politics.
 
What I want to know is how all this is going to affect the Firebox menu


a stew made of exPLUSEsions. A soup made of regret and seasoned with biterness. All rounded off with a soupcon of wafer thin regret as the rest of us watch the whole org slow-mo cacrash. We here and that may never have been fans of their politics, their methods and their dubious results but I dunno, I just can't really take any joy out of watching an avowedly leftwing org come undone and under such grim circumstances. Its just depressing.
 
a stew made of exPLUSEsions. A soup made of regret and seasoned with biterness. All rounded off with a soupcon of wafer thin regret as the rest of us watch the whole org slow-mo cacrash. We here and that may never have been fans of their politics, their methods and their dubious results but I dunno, I just can't really take any joy out of watching an avowedly leftwing org come undone and under such grim circumstances. Its just depressing.

There is no need to fear or hope, but only to look for new weapons.
 
The new Network seems to be implicitly encouraging some supporters or sympathisers to stay in the SWP presumably to report back and try to influence softer oppositionists in their (the Network's) direction.

Which makes sense.

Nigel Irritable is spot on about the principal reasons this lot won't join Counterfire because they sided with the CC against Rees & German in the previous split for reasons that are in at least part consistant with their current position.
 
Back
Top Bottom