Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

I am the fox on the iceberg
I am the walrus
Coo coo clarks shoes
foxs-glacier-mints.jpg
 
There is something very sad indeed about witnessing all this in frame by frame technicolour.

Time was when the SWP meant hope and possibility. Even at this distance (20 years) i have so many cherished memories of comradely friendship with some truly excellent people. Who could forget the Skegness days, or the linking of arms at Warrington, the combining to create the ANL, or the political relationships forged in the struggle of the great miners strike etc?

Can it really be that this implosion will leave only a cyborg Leninist rump devoid of the very qualities that gave the party its edge over the rest?
 
There is something very sad indeed about witnessing all this in frame by frame technicolour.

Time was when the SWP meant hope and possibility. Even at this distance (20 years) i have so many cherished memories of comradely friendship with some truly excellent people. Who could forget the Skegness days, or the linking of arms at Warrington, the combining to create the ANL, or the political relationships forged in the struggle of the great miners strike etc?


The Labour Party once meant hope and possibility too.

The increasing twists and turns in the post-Iraq world meant that some kind of split was likely to happen at some point. But the nature of this and the fact that it's being played out over the botched sexual harassment/rape case due to the CC fuck-up is a particularly bitter taste in the mouth.
 
Callinicos wants Delta reintegrated fully into party activities??

Can't wait to see the breakdown of voting figures on that one.
 
Just got this in my inbox from Kimber - I'm obviously still counted among the SWP membership!


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Charlie Kimber <Charlie@swp.org.uk>
To: Charlie Kimber ext email <joeeamon@aol.com>
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2013, 11:01
Subject: Deadlines, support for CC statement, and faction meetings



Deadlines for motions and IB, support for CC statement, and faction meetings.

Dear comrade,

Here is some information in the run-up to the SWP special conference on 10 March.

Internal bulletin and motions

May I remind you that the deadline for the internal bulletin is 10am, Friday 1 March. This is also the deadline for motions. Motions must be passed by a properly-organised branch, aggregate, fraction, NC or CC meeting and be in by the deadline for the IB. Motions that are to be discussed must be notified to members in good time so that there is proper opportunity for democratic discussion.

Signatures in support of the CC statement

The first 500 names of comrades supporting the CC statement that was sent out last weekend are pasted below. Comrades wishing to add their name should email addmynametoccstatement@gmail.com

[fucking massive list of signatories removed - it's only first names and initials but best to be safe]

Faction meetings

It has always been the party’s practice that faction meetings should be open to all SWP members (and only to SWP members). It is, however, reasonable that part of a faction meeting can be closed to comrades who are not members of the faction in order to have a caucus.

We are one party, not two. It is unacceptable to have wholly closed meetings, and factions should feel able to argue their political perspective with other party members.

The In Defence Of Our Party faction is holding a meeting in Leeds: [date and venue removed]
The faction may be contacted at swpidoop@gmail.com

Solidarity,

Charlie Kimber, SWP national secretary

The list of the 'first 500' CC signatories is intended to create a certain impression isn't it? First, that since that's only the first 500 there must be loads and loads more. Second, that since there's no corresponding list for the faction they don't have any real support.

I must say I'm looking forward to the internal bulletins - they promise to be very interesting indeed.
 
There is something very sad indeed about witnessing all this in frame by frame technicolour.

Time was when the SWP meant hope and possibility. Even at this distance (20 years) i have so many cherished memories of comradely friendship with some truly excellent people. Who could forget the Skegness days, or the linking of arms at Warrington, the combining to create the ANL, or the political relationships forged in the struggle of the great miners strike etc?

Can it really be that this implosion will leave only a cyborg Leninist rump devoid of the very qualities that gave the party its edge over the rest?

which branch were you in? there are a few ex SWP vets on here, some stretching back to the 70s!
 
There's only one word I take issue with in your post. It's "leading", because conscious engagement as and assumption of the mantle of "leading" of the class struggle, outwith any form of delegation of that leadership by the class to that person or people, is a contributor to the alienation of the working class from organised left politics.

I added leading because that's what it means to the SWP.
 
If we were I missed it. Who?
I was thinking of this, but my memory seems to have been faulty, I remembered it as saying she carried on regardless, but reading it again it seems to imply she stooped.
At the start of the discussion, incidentally, Alex barked at Amy Gilligan, insisting she stop taking notes. He, however, continued to cheerfully fill his notebook with copious notes throughout the meeting, as well as typing into his Blackberry
 
Just got this in my inbox from Kimber - I'm obviously still counted among the SWP membership!



The list of the 'first 500' CC signatories is intended to create a certain impression isn't it? First, that since that's only the first 500 there must be loads and loads more. Second, that since there's no corresponding list for the faction they don't have any real support.

I must say I'm looking forward to the internal bulletins - they promise to be very interesting indeed.
I have seen the same email, is it said that I read all the names? Haven't done a count thought.
 
Yes, yes it is. But you're not alone, I was sad enough to do exactly the same (and got disappointed when I saw the names of people I once respected).
There is one person I am very disappointed with but i already new his position, other than that of the names i recognised there were no surprises
 
It's like someone on the Titanic saying "have we sunk yet?" over and over.
as it is a prediction made almost monthly over the last 10 years, one has had a lot of opportunity to take the piss.

PS. not been on board for over 10 years. So it is nothing like it.
 
Back
Top Bottom