That's excellent.Just heard someone describe the Faction as the SWP's very own House of Lords revolt.
I suspect that opposition to expulsions is probably the overwhelming preference of people in the Faction. Although how absolute that preference is may vary considerably.
Serious question:
Assume for a moment that the CC does lose it's bottle, how could it arrange a compromise? What it could it offer?
Smith, Kimber and a few seats.
Depends if they are in the faction or not. I can't see them cohering without SEYMOUR! whipping them and i think he's on his way out of organised party politics. The fulltimers were made fulltimers precisely because of their dull inability to collectively challenge the CC - without a strong lead (and let's face it, China is not it) they are going nowhwere. A few penititi and they'l crumble without Seymour - if the lords go, as i expect, down the path of negotiation as far as possible.What happens to the Seymourites? What happens to the fulltimers pushed out of their jobs? Does a "lame duck" CC and apparatus largely stay in place?
Can't see an oval board this end...Do people think it looks better with the oval board? can change it back lol
thing is, the cc are massively incompetent, as they have shown. so far, their attempts to split the opposition have done the opposite, unifying them (to some extent) and drawing in others. callinicos is no fighter.Stalin's left turn to forced industrialisation in 1928 - split the trot opposition as it looked like (and really was) their own program. The CC are doing the same manouvere with their published need for a "sharp ideological turn". They're going to more like the opposition than the opposition soon - one the immediate danger is dealt with.
Heads, lots of heads and apologies.Serious question:
Assume for a moment that the CC does lose it's bottle, how could it arrange a compromise? What it could it offer?
Totally agree, in their minds this is what they are doing though - they've shown that they don't have the basic competence to do it or to to even create the conditions that might allow them to try it.
I watched 5 minutes of a kimber video last night - this is not someone who could make a rooster fight.
callinicos is no fighter.
Initial "Platform" signatories by branch:
Bristol South
Brixton (x3)
Camden (x2)
Canterbury (x3)
Edinburgh (x6)
Euston (x5)
Hackney East (x2)
Hornsey and Wood Green
Oxford (x3)
Leeds Central
Leicester (x4)
Leytonstone
Liverpool (x4)
Manchester Rusholme (x3)
Newcastle
Norwich (x2)
Nottingham (x2)
Portsmouth (x5)
Sheffield North (x3)
Sheffield South (x4)
Stoke on Trent (x2)
Sussex and Brighton (x7)
Swansea
Thanet
Tottenham (x2)
Tower Hamlets
Wandsworth and Merton (x2)
Wigan
York
80 total in 33 branches (plus four expelled)
Initial "Faction" signatories by branch:
Goldsmiths (x2)
Norwich
Birmingham (x5)
Brighton (x3)
Brixton
Bury (x2)
Cambridge
Camden
Croydon
Edinburgh
Euston (x7)
Glasgow
Hackney (x5)
Hackney South (x2)
Hornsey and Wood Green
Islington (x3)
Kent (x2)
Leeds (x2)
Leicester
Lewisham
Liverpool (x2)
Manchester (x3)
Newham
Norwich
Oxford (x3)
South London
Tooting
Walthamstow (x6)
No branch given (x5)
(66 signatories, 28 branches, 5 have no branch given)
Branches which passed a recall conference motion:
Aberdeen
Canterbury
Croydon
Edinburgh
Hull
Liverpool
Middlesbrough
Manchester Rusholme
+at least two others.
Branches which passed some other critical motion:
Brighton
Brixton
Bury
Euston
Lewisham
Norwich
Portsmouth
Tower Hamlets
Wandsworth and Merton
it's his role in the faction.It's not his role in the party.
Yep, and by god i'm glad staples didn't mumble all over them - although he does some i think.Have you heard the Claire Denis soundtracks by them?
if you'd actually bothered to read his book butchers then you'd know that he makes it very clear that he went to private school on a scholarship and certainly isn't anything like the rest of those oxbridge typesPrivate school and oxbridge
he is fantastic. I dont think that stops him from being yet another example of private school / Oxbridge dominance. Or is it ok if they went on a scholarship and make you laugh?