Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

Am I missing something? Where are Seymour and Mieville’s names? Are they going it alone or were they expelled without me noticing?
There is a faction - it's from what i think was one of the factions at the conference, the small centrist one. The other lot have declared they want to constitute a platform within that faction - i don't see why they should be allowed to.
 
but are they going to set up their own fractional organ? This is a matter of extreme importance to the class
 
ViolentPanda. (well named)

Meaning?
Have I physically assaulted you at some time in the past?

I have tried to post comments on here in a constructive and informative way. I have not tried to take the piss out of anyone. I responded to you sarcastic point about my 40 years in the movement in a factual way. I certanly do not think I have any more working class credentials than any other contributor on this site.

Then why mention them in such a way as to assert "working class credibility"?

Have you ever considered that you come across as an offensive and disruptive individual.

Yes. To most people it doesn't matter as long as I contribute meaningfully. To some people it does, usually those more concerned with style than with substance. If someone says something stupid/ignorant/repellent/crass it's incumbent on everyone else to point that out to them, not to coddle them and/or their attitudes.

Why dont you stop having a go at people and say something constructive.

People? You mean the sort of person who rocks up and tell people they're wrong about X, Y and Z without bothering to explain exactly how they're wrong; who extrapolate their own experiences as representative of the generality of SWP membership; who gob off while adding little or nothing to the mix?
Because that's the sort of person I have a go at. Don't talk shite and you don't get shite.

As for constructive contributions, I make plenty, as my sympathisers and my opposers will attest. :)
 
g34oL1b.jpg

Sexist!
 
Oh fuck, here it comes, the "considerably more working class cred than yow" argument.
That might mean something in the SWP. It means fuck-all when most of the people you're saying it to have the same "credentials".

I think you're out of order. There's no need for your hatred of the SWP to lead you to treat people in such a disrespectful and aggressive way.
 
Meaning?
Have I physically assaulted you at some time in the past?



Then why mention them in such a way as to assert "working class credibility"?



Yes. To most people it doesn't matter as long as I contribute meaningfully. To some people it does, usually those more concerned with style than with substance. If someone says something stupid/ignorant/repellent/crass it's incumbent on everyone else to point that out to them, not to coddle them and/or their attitudes.



People? You mean the sort of person who rocks up and tell people they're wrong about X, Y and Z without bothering to explain exactly how they're wrong; who extrapolate their own experiences as representative of the generality of SWP membership; who gob off while adding little or nothing to the mix?
Because that's the sort of person I have a go at. Don't talk shite and you don't get shite.

As for constructive contributions, I make plenty, as my sympathisers and my opposers will attest. :)


just pm him. We have bigger fish to fry here.
 
Back
Top Bottom