Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

Bunny came into her unpleasant element again when she ran up against Stoke SP comrades. She went from sweetness and light at the founding meeting of North Staffs NSSN to an aggressive bully at the anti-fascist rally held a few days later. When we turned up at the rally with our banner she *commanded*(!) we take it down because “it was agreed” no party banners or placards were allowed (we refused). Needless to say her concern for this spurious agreement (if indeed it ever existed) evaporated when her fellow SWP’ers disembarked their coaches and broke out their SWP-branded ‘Smash the BNP’ plaques. Then at last week’s debate, she harassed our paper sellers and leafleters by telling them where and when they could/couldn’t sell/leaflet, led the charge in shouting down – with some Labour people – one of our comrades who pointed out the rise of the BNP in Stoke might have something to do with the identikit policies of the mainstream parties, snapped at the coffee attendant to make sure one of our comrades paid for his drink, and curled her lip at the activist on the NorSCARF stall – for the crime of daring to carry Searchlight material. It beggars belief someone obviously unsuited to this kind of work, let alone a full time position in a socialist organisation, has been so appointed. What does this say about the SWP?
 
So given who has signed up, the 'they're not really one of us' defence isn't available. How does the much criticised CC deal with dissent on this scale and from these quarters; can it expel the problem with out causing terminal damage and if they don't expel can they carry on with their authority so questioned?

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
That first point is excellent - bolshiebhoy and those card players have been trumped by this one.
 
It's not a unified opposition statement at all. It's a revamped "soft" opposition. Still of note though given who the initial signatories are: Pat S, Ian B, Colin B, mike G etc.

Is that "Colin B" , ancient Manchester SWP longtimer, Colin Barker ? Gawd, if it is, I'm amazed. I'd have thought he would have rather sawn his own leg off with a blunt spoon than be even moderately "factional". If it is indeed Colin Barker, I recall during the mid 1981 run up to the purging of us "Squadists" in Manchester, I was at an SWP social and drifting about with a beerglass in my hand and by chance found myself next to Colin. He did a theatrical doubletake, and literally SCUTTLED to the far side of the room - as far away as possible from someone he had been a friendly comrade with for nearly ten years, but was now UNCLEAN !

Are these high profile "oppositionists" a bit like the tame bogus "resistance cells" set up in Occupied France by German counter intelligence to attract genuine people in , nullify their activities , and then "dispose" of em ? In other words a "respectable" old guard "faction" emerges with a few" procedural quibbles", is soon satisfied with whatever fudge the leadership concocts to "solve the problem", and then declares the issue "resolved" -- a round of applause for the soundness of SWP democratic centralism. On to business as usual ?
 
Is that "Colin B" , ancient Manchester SWP longtimer, Colin Barker ? Gawd, if it is, I'm amazed. I'd have thought he would have rather sawn his own leg off with a blunt spoon than be even moderately "factional". If it is indeed Colin Barker, I recall during the mid 1981 run up to the purging of us "Squadists" in Manchester, I was at an SWP social and drifting about with a beerglass in my hand and by chance found myself next to Colin. He did a theatrical doubletake, and literally SCUTTLED to the far side of the room - as far away as possible from someone he had been a friendly comrade with for nearly ten years, but was now UNCLEAN !

Are these high profile "oppositionists" a bit like the tame bogus "resistance cells" set up in Occupied France by German counter intelligence to attract genuine people in , nullify their activities , and then "dispose" of em ? In other words a "respectable" old guard "faction" emerges with a few" procedural quibbles", is soon satisfied with whatever fudge the leadership concocts to "solve the problem", and then declares the issue "resolved" -- a round of applause for the soundness of SWP democratic centralism. On to business as usual ?

Colin Barker (Manchester)one and the same

Essentially a lot of these are the 'reasonable face of the party' ( although i have just seen a couple of names who are top class nut jobs, not sure they would have the stomach for anything more than an internal campaign and then go home.
 
So given who has signed up, the 'they're not really one of us' defence isn't available. How does the much criticised CC deal with dissent on this scale and from these quarters; can it expel the problem with out causing terminal damage and if they don't expel can they carry on with their authority so questioned?

Cheers - Louis MacNeice

I agree, this is much better than the Seymourites declaring a faction - the CC can't afford in my view to expel this lot then go after the Seymour-Mievillists - these are the people they need on board.
 
Am I missing something? Where are Seymour and Mieville’s names? Are they going it alone or were they expelled without me noticing?
 
Back
Top Bottom