Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

I thought the ISO were getting closer to the SWP

They have been, but more in the sense that they will exchange the odd speaker and not snarl at each other in public than in the sense of any kind of reunion. But their people, including leaders, have been all over this on facebook.
 
They have been, but more in the sense that they will exchange the odd speaker than in the sense of any kind of reunion. But their people, including leaders, have been all over this on facebook.

How do you guys find this shit on facebook. I have an account, and I use it to organise poker meetups, laugh at people online, and show family pictures of my family. I recently re-friended Renton, who I've always respected. But how would I find people "all over this"?
 
Maybe I was reading what I wanted to into it. Would trouble me more if he jumped sides than most!
I find it difficult to get a handle on what he thinks (just slimming over all his posts at the moment), I don't think he is going to jump sides, but I get the feeling he is grumbling privately
 
outside of resistancemp3 and bolshiebhoy I always considered Rosen their most unabashed fellow traveller. :p
Lol but I'm convinced there must be thousands of us dotted round the place. for evey person who leaves the SWP in disgust or in disagreement there must be at least one who left or never joined just out of lack of revolutionary zeal or whatever. And those of us like that will still tend to instinctively side with the party on most things.
 
I find it difficult to get a handle on what he thinks (just slimming over all his posts at the moment), I don't think he is going to jump sides, but I get the feeling he is grumbling privately

I agree with this. I don't think he'll jump - if I had to guess he'll just remain neutral and maybe he'll be "busy" during Marxism. Which I actually think is up in the air - ie if the CC force through their NC meeting expulsions and so on I think Marxism won't happen or will be tightly controlled and become an education camp or something.
 
He has resolutely refused to respond to tweets about it - he retweeted one and invited others to attach the tweeter and that's it. My experience of him is that he'll find this hard to comprehend, but he has no particular loyalty to the SWP - he did do a talk at Bookmarks with John Rose yesterday for HMD though.

He's sort of saying Democratic Centralism is wrong, but says only some of SWP's problems are due to DC. An external cloaked way of saying 'sort yourselves out decommission Delta, but keep the CC as it is' he's not publicly saying I won't go to Marxism and he does go to Marxism pretty much every year.



Michael Rosen 3 days ago in Lenin's Tomb said:
redcogs, why assume that you should 'get' what I'm saying? I was musing publicly that my parents left (in party or wholly - ask Don, he seems to know) for reasons to do with internal democracy in a democratic centralist organisation. I've never belonged to a dc organisation. Whatever travails the SWP is going through, some of it is due to trying to make dc work in this context, here and now. I thought by opening a conversation about people who struggled with this sort of thing 50 odd years ago, might contribute something to the discussion. It's not only 'others' or 'society' who has history. The communist and communistic left have history too. Obviously.

http://www.leninology.com/2013/01/new-swp-blog.html#disqus_thread

Also worth noting that Michael Rosen has shared several platforms in 2011 and 2012 with Delta himself as part of Unite Against Fascism on defending multiculturalism - he isn't asking any particular public questions at all.
 
my son fucking loves that book. absolutely loves it. and for that I can forgive Rosen most things.
Ditto. I had a very odd conversation with my lad tonight because his mum (I made the mistake of mentioning Rosen and this stuff) told him the book was written by a guy who likes rapists. He was muchly upset!
 
That's not true - well it is that my daughter is a week old - but the daughter I'm talking about is 2 and a half and gets it, she just prefers "oops" or "This is the track that is taking him back" or "my favourite food is owl ice-cream"
 
Lol but I'm convinced there must be thousands of us dotted round the place. for evey person who leaves the SWP in disgust or in disagreement there must be at least one who left or never joined just out of lack of revolutionary zeal or whatever. And those of us like that will still tend to instinctively side with the party on most things.

I'm really not trying to be snarky but I think you might be kidding yourself on there. When you think of the thousands who have been through the SWP the last 35 plus years, it's kind of shocking that there aren't "thousands of" you "dotted round the place" who retain some sort of residual admiration for their political past. It's in direct contrast to the history of the old CP and it's ex-members.
 
I agree with this. I don't think he'll jump - if I had to guess he'll just remain neutral and maybe he'll be "busy" during Marxism. Which I actually think is up in the air - ie if the CC force through their NC meeting expulsions and so on I think Marxism won't happen or will be tightly controlled and become an education camp or something.
Things really are up in the air at the moment. I am seriously tempted to go along to one of these revolt things they are having just to see what the atmosphere is like.
 
I'm really not trying to be snarky but I think you might be kidding yourself on there. When you think of the thousands who have been through the SWP the last 35 plus years, it's kind of shocking that there aren't "thousands of" you "dotted round the place" who retain some sort of residual admiration for their political past. It's in direct contrast to the history of the old CP and it's ex-members.
You could be right, I honestly don't know. I suppose the SWP was always more of a revolving door than the cp for many reasons so yeah my ratio of disgruntled to simply disconnected might be a tad optimistic ;-)
 
Things really are up in the air at the moment. I am seriously tempted to go along to one of these revolt things they are having just to see what the atmosphere is like.

I genuinely think they are up in the air. If (as I suspect) the CC remain in place and force through the discipline, they'll not have a significant layer of cadre at their disposal. That affects planning for a number of events.
 
I promise I do the noises and make it theatrical and that. I don't think she gets it to be honest (she's a week old).

it's the first book that he's learnt by heart, and up until a few weeks ago he would read and act it out about 15 times a night. He's now moved on to 'Go Away Big Green Monster' which, despite the title, was not written by a member of the Spiked Online team.

Sorry, I really must stop derailing this thread. I'm playing into the hands of the SWP's CC.
 
What? I'm not one to comment on your personal or family life, but I feel like I have to say that...
I know and I'd just got him interested in Marx For Beginners too. Now she's gone all feminist on my head and tried to ban all left literature as mysogonistic. This bloody mess is having some strange fallout :-(
 
I know and I'd just got him interested in Marx For Beginners too. Now she's gone all feminist on my head and tried to ban all left literature as mysogonistic. This bloody mess is having some strange fallout :-(

I'm still trying to get my head around you and Newman both being members of the Swindon Labour Party. It's like an episode of Bill Brand that they never got round to broadcasting.
 
I genuinely think they are up in the air.

Yes, although it does seem likely at this point that the CC's deadline will pass without 20% of branches passing motions. And, assuming that to be the case, the CC will try to use the NC to pull people back into line.

Then the question is, do they continue to sit on their hands, and hope the hard oppositionists walk, or do they start the purge. Either way, it's going to get even messier.

It is so utterly out of character for them to have sat back and allowed this continued impertinence for so long. They must have been absolutely terrified of pushing the vacillating middle over to the opposition, and of getting crucified in the press again.
 
I think that Callinicos' piece suggests a purge, as does the only statement we have from the CC. Anything else is basically them resigning given that piece. And they cannot possibly allow anyone behind the oppositionists (though we should remember they aren't all agreed!) webpage to not be expelled.
 
As for the out of character part - remember this CC are inexperienced. Four of them joined at about the time I did, most after.
 
I think that Callinicos' piece suggests a purge, as does the only statement we have from the CC. Anything else is basically them resigning given that piece. And they cannot possibly allow anyone behind the oppositionists (though we should remember they aren't all agreed!) webpage to not be expelled.
why can't they?
 
OK, I mean Seymour, China, and those at the height. Unless they "realign" the party or whatever is being demanded, the people behind the oppositionists will need to be expelled. I guess they could hold a recall conference, win the argument, and keep them, in theory. But no.
 
Back
Top Bottom