Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

I recognise about 4 names, only one of which was actually in he party, as far as i know
They are talking as people who have spoken at Marxism or written for its publications. not members - and a lot of them have the serious sort of semi-mainstream soft left or academic clout the SWP have long courted them for. Shame on your for only knowing 4!
 
I recognise about 4 names, only one of which was actually in he party, as far as i know

I think it could be argued that Bakan, McNally, Post, Power and Kellogg are biggish names in this small pond we're all swimming in.

And I understand via facebook that Conor Kostick has added his name to the letter.
 
Well that is 17 fewer people who will be at Marxism this year. I wonder if Tony Benn will add his name to this list?
 
They are talking as people who have spoken at Marxism or written for its publications. not members - and a lot of them have the serious sort of semi-mainstream soft left or academic clout the SWP have long courted them for. Shame on your for only knowing 4!
I know they are - I am being dubious about whether they are really 'in the IS tradition'.

& I'm guessing David McNally isnt the one who made Coyote ugly.
 
I know they are - I am being dubious about whether they are really 'in the IS tradition'.

& I'm guessing David McNally isnt the one who made Coyote ugly.
They didn't claim to be though. And as we all know, only the CC can decide what the IS tradition is and how it should be used as an internal flaming sword of justice.
 
I know they are - I am being dubious about whether they are really 'in the IS tradition'.

& I'm guessing David McNally isnt the one who made Coyote ugly.

I wrote tradition as a catch all term. :D

Wasn't McNally the leader of the Canadian section of the IST for many years before an earlier split?
 
"A
long‐time member of the International Socialists and later the New
Socialist Group..."

apparently

I just vaguely remember that years ago - showing my age - that McNally and Bakan especially were high profile speakers at Marxism. The nineties? I'll happily be corrected by list members who have the SWP as their specialist Mastermind subject.
 
Abbie Bakan wrote the great lie: why the ussr isn't socialist, which was the main pamphlet setting state capitalist theory out when I joined in 1985
 
Agree with butchers this letter is a blow, these are heavy hitters. On the other hand it's no secret that the US and Canadian branches of the IS have been making their peace with academic feminism for a while and the explicit reference to sexism in the letter will not endear the signatories to the middle ground loyalists. Much safer and more damaging if they'd just stuck to the handling of a high profile allegation rather than implying a general problem within the party.
 
I just vaguely remember that years ago - showing my age - that McNally and Bakan especially were high profile speakers at Marxism. The nineties? I'll happily be corrected by list members who have the SWP as their specialist Mastermind subject.
McNally was prominent in the Canadian IS,I heard him speak at Marxism in the late 80s. He's been banging on with a, in my view mistaken, argument about Marx on the rate of profit for years. I see that the ISJ last had an article about him in 2003, although there is a much more recent debate over a review he wrote of an SWP book. Do I get to score my point?
 
McNally was prominent in the Canadian IS,I heard him speak at Marxism in the late 80s. He's been banging on with a, in my view mistaken, argument about Marx on the rate of profit for years. I see that the ISJ last had an article about him in 2003, although there is a much more recent debate over a review he wrote of an SWP book. Do I get to score my point?

let's see how you do in the general knowledge round.
 
abigal said:
The Kronstadt revolt had the character of a mutiny against the Bolshevik leadership of the military. and of the state. This arose at a time when that state was in a desperately vulnerable position, with its survival at stake.

abigal said:
We have all previously participated in events and initiatives promoted by the SWP, including the annual Marxism festival, or written for its publications. We continue to value the commitment and work of many SWP members as trades unionists, activists and comrades. Nonetheless, we can no longer in good conscience participate in SWP publications and platformsuntil the party recognises and seriously addresses the legitimate
criticisms of its handling of this case and the ensuing crisis.

Kill 'em abigal, the survival of the party is at stake. Not your tenured gender prof job. These desperados - why are the SWP always producing them?
 
I don't think anyone would argue that the CC don't genuinely believe in the politics - anyone suggesting otherwise is being a bit daft.

The only person on here who never seems to have grasped this is RMP3, though it appears he's got Oisin123 for company now.
I wonder how Oisi123 has misconstrued their true intention, when PM VP BA 'have' explained it so clearly, WHERE????????????????

I have never said I am not aware the structural determinism some anarchists engage in, all I have done is invited them to flesh out this analysis. something they have steadfastly refused to do.

It's perfectly possible for them to really share those ideals and engage in all kinds of Machiavellian power grabbing type stuff too.
you mean like the SP and the Socialist Alliance? :D
 
You are on a dangerous path.


maybe. i think the party does good work in my area though and there are a lot of people i respect in it. i don't think that looking into the history and ideas behind this stuff is a bad thing though and dont really have any respect for the idea of lenin and trotsky being some sort of jesus-like figures that must never be questioned.
 
I wonder how Oisi123 has misconstrued their true intention, when PM VP BA 'have' explained it so clearly, WHERE????????????????

I have never said I am not aware the structural determinism some anarchists engage in, all I have done is invited them to flesh out this analysis. something they have steadfastly refused to do.

you mean like the SP and the Socialist Alliance? :D

I can add Oisin's post 3746 to the vast list of stuff you have failed to read or understand; you really are the daftest of brushes.

Louis MacNeice
 
Back
Top Bottom