Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
what's this about a secret agenda?So that's a no, you won't share your views on the SW CC secret agenda?
what's this about a secret agenda?So that's a no, you won't share your views on the SW CC secret agenda?
I recognise about 4 names, only one of which was actually in he party, as far as i know
They are talking as people who have spoken at Marxism or written for its publications. not members - and a lot of them have the serious sort of semi-mainstream soft left or academic clout the SWP have long courted them for. Shame on your for only knowing 4!I recognise about 4 names, only one of which was actually in he party, as far as i know
I recognise about 4 names, only one of which was actually in he party, as far as i know
Yes, no one would go to listen to these people. That's why they have previously been invited to Marxism. For lack of draw and credibility.Well that is 17 fewer people who will be at Marxism this year.
I know they are - I am being dubious about whether they are really 'in the IS tradition'.They are talking as people who have spoken at Marxism or written for its publications. not members - and a lot of them have the serious sort of semi-mainstream soft left or academic clout the SWP have long courted them for. Shame on your for only knowing 4!
Sorry, I have edited my incomplete post.Yes, no one would go to listen to these people. That's why they have previously been invited to Marxism. For lack of draw and credibility.
They didn't claim to be though. And as we all know, only the CC can decide what the IS tradition is and how it should be used as an internal flaming sword of justice.I know they are - I am being dubious about whether they are really 'in the IS tradition'.
& I'm guessing David McNally isnt the one who made Coyote ugly.
I know they are - I am being dubious about whether they are really 'in the IS tradition'.
& I'm guessing David McNally isnt the one who made Coyote ugly.
but as I was replying to imposs1904, who did say they were...They didn't claim to be though.
"AWasn't McNally the leader of the Canadian section of the IST for many years before an earlier split?
Hence your quoting me in the post rather than himbut as I was replying to imposs1904, who did say they were...
"A
long‐time member of the International Socialists and later the New
Socialist Group..."
apparently
shit hot on Kronstadt tooAbbie Bakan wrote the great lie: why the ussr isn't socialist, which was the main pamphlet setting state capitalist theory out when I joined in 1985
shit hot on Kronstadt too
Absolutely he inspired that Girls Aloud track on that bootleg that was unfortunately wthdrawn .
Continuity between Lenin and Stalin is often claimed by reference to the Kronstadt revolt of 1921. But as Abbie Bakan explains the repression was necessary to defend the revolution.
McNally was prominent in the Canadian IS,I heard him speak at Marxism in the late 80s. He's been banging on with a, in my view mistaken, argument about Marx on the rate of profit for years. I see that the ISJ last had an article about him in 2003, although there is a much more recent debate over a review he wrote of an SWP book. Do I get to score my point?I just vaguely remember that years ago - showing my age - that McNally and Bakan especially were high profile speakers at Marxism. The nineties? I'll happily be corrected by list members who have the SWP as their specialist Mastermind subject.
You are on a dangerous path.Yeah after looking at Kronstadt there was no excuse for it.
McNally was prominent in the Canadian IS,I heard him speak at Marxism in the late 80s. He's been banging on with a, in my view mistaken, argument about Marx on the rate of profit for years. I see that the ISJ last had an article about him in 2003, although there is a much more recent debate over a review he wrote of an SWP book. Do I get to score my point?
abigal said:The Kronstadt revolt had the character of a mutiny against the Bolshevik leadership of the military. and of the state. This arose at a time when that state was in a desperately vulnerable position, with its survival at stake.
abigal said:We have all previously participated in events and initiatives promoted by the SWP, including the annual Marxism festival, or written for its publications. We continue to value the commitment and work of many SWP members as trades unionists, activists and comrades. Nonetheless, we can no longer in good conscience participate in SWP publications and platformsuntil the party recognises and seriously addresses the legitimate
criticisms of its handling of this case and the ensuing crisis.
I wonder how Oisi123 has misconstrued their true intention, when PM VP BA 'have' explained it so clearly, WHERE????????????????I don't think anyone would argue that the CC don't genuinely believe in the politics - anyone suggesting otherwise is being a bit daft.
The only person on here who never seems to have grasped this is RMP3, though it appears he's got Oisin123 for company now.
you mean like the SP and the Socialist Alliance?It's perfectly possible for them to really share those ideals and engage in all kinds of Machiavellian power grabbing type stuff too.
You are on a dangerous path.
I wonder how Oisi123 has misconstrued their true intention, when PM VP BA 'have' explained it so clearly, WHERE????????????????
I have never said I am not aware the structural determinism some anarchists engage in, all I have done is invited them to flesh out this analysis. something they have steadfastly refused to do.
you mean like the SP and the Socialist Alliance?