Pretty sure i've seen that episode on sky. I remember thinking it would upset some people at the time. Not sure what year i saw it though. Think the bbc wouldn't show it.Banned IN UK and Ireland
Star Trek episode buried for 34 years over ‘Irish unification in 2024’
The High Ground, made in 1990 but delayed from airing for 17 years, has the character Data referring to the Irish unification of 2024www.thetimes.co.uk
edit - I realise what I posted may not have come across as I intendedMost of the leading characters are fairly solid at their jobs but Worf is the one who always seems out of place. I get they wanted a Klingon to have a leading role but chief of security? It's those very fight-first Klingon character traits that make him unsuitable for the role. On a ship like the Enterprise, constantly involved in delicate diplomacy, would someone who constantly has to be stopped in his tracks by more senior officers because of his gung-ho "it's time for battle" attitude really have been given that position? I do like the Worf character and there are some good episodes (A Fistful of Datas etc) that revolve around him but you just can't imagine him ever getting that job.
I must have seen it in 2006 or 2007 then.Sky edited out the offending line when they broadcast it in 1992 whereas the BBC just binned the whole episode. Both of them later showed it unedited (Sky in 2006, BBC in 2007) It's always been available unedited on VHS/DVD though.
Controversies aside it's actually a decent episode that has some thoughtful things to say on the subject of terrorism and its consequences.
I have it on DVD. It was also shown in full on Netflix. I haven’t seen it on Paramount+ but I’m sure it’s there too.Sky edited out the offending line when they broadcast it in 1992 whereas the BBC just binned the whole episode. Both of them later showed it unedited (Sky in 2006, BBC in 2007) It's always been available unedited on VHS/DVD though.
Controversies aside it's actually a decent episode that has some thoughtful things to say on the subject of terrorism and its consequences.
So do I Danny I have every episode of Star Trek ever released. Mrs Q thinks this is very sad and she might be right.I have it on DVD. It was also shown in full on Netflix. I haven’t seen it on Paramount+ but I’m sure it’s there too.
Sad means “cool”, right, the way sick does?So do I Danny I have every episode of Star Trek ever released. Mrs Q thinks this is very sad and she might be right.
Absolutely my friend absolutelySad means “cool”, right, the way sick does?
Most of the leading characters are fairly solid at their jobs but Worf is the one who always seems out of place. I get they wanted a Klingon to have a leading role but chief of security? It's those very fight-first Klingon character traits that make him unsuitable for the role. On a ship like the Enterprise, constantly involved in delicate diplomacy, would someone who constantly has to be stopped in his tracks by more senior officers because of his gung-ho "it's time for battle" attitude really have been given that position? I do like the Worf character and there are some good episodes (A Fistful of Datas etc) that revolve around him but you just can't imagine him ever getting that job.
They're all deadHa! Got to about 5mins and thought there can't be a lot more, only to check and find there was another 10mins to come!
Someone should do an alternate history based on how alien encounters would have ended up if Worf was making the decisions.
I really enjoyed the first 2-3 seasons of Discovery. So far I've forced myself to watch two episodes of the latest season, and it's really hard not to switch it off partway through, it's so tedious. Ten minutes of action and fifty minutes of whispered over-emotional conversations and hand-clasping.I see Discovery has quickly reverted back to its 'let's stretch this single plot point over an entire series' tactic again.
Federation was destroyed by the barrel people of centrii-delta.They're all dead
First two seasons are excellentpeople hating on discovery whilst without it trek would not be were it at today
it had it up and downs but it first 2 season were good Trek still better entry to the series than most of enterprise
Mmm… I’m sure there are such people out there but for me it’s not that at all. Perhaps I’m getting more stupid or forgetful as I grow older, but I found Discovery’s increasingly confusing and needlessly overcomplex plot lines, involving Nolanesque time-travelling paradoxes, not just exhausting but not reflecting of historical DNA of the show.Some Trek fans who loved the show over various incarnations just can't accept later incarnations because they're older now.
Not to say that newer incarnations aren't flawed, but every iteration of the franchise has its bad runs.
Started watching it recently, now over halfway through the first season and it's good fun. Doesn't need prior knowledge of the mega franchise and family friendly without being saccharine. Reminds me of the Clone Wars (which have temporarily bailed on) but faster paced and more engaging.Watched the first two episodes of Star Trek Prodigy. It’s bloody good! Children friendly but not childish and enjoyable for grownups as well.
Cracking thrilling action, far better than S2 of Picard (though that’s not difficult I guess). A number of celebrity voices and at least one legacy character from the ST universe. On Nick- recommended.