It's just something endemically silly, and all too human. It convinced whateverhernameis she's a real person. It was also really crap and embarrassing.I felt the worst was the two minutes of skidding. What on earth was the point of that?
He's the showrunner.It's just something endemically silly, and all too human. It convinced whateverhernameis she's a real person. It was also really crap and embarrassing.
I only just realised Michael Chabon - Michael Chabon - wrote two of the episodes. And not two of the half decent if you like that kind of a thing episodes.
yeah, tho it looks to be more like showhavesomeideaswhiledrunking.He's the showrunner.
She was the wide-eyed innocent character in Star Trek Discovery.No idea who that is, sorry.
I don't think I watched more than a couple of episodes of that - I didn't like it for some reason.She was the wide-eyed innocent character in Star Trek Discovery.
the scene this week when Hugh introduces Picard to the reclamation project was probably the highlight of the series so far (faint praise…)
Stewart was perfect, his hopeful awe taking over from the tired cynicism that Picard’s been dealing with until now. it was a great contrast with his tour of the Romulan resettlement town two weeks ago. here was one bright spark of someone doing good to remind him of the optimism for the universe he used to have.
but it was somewhat ruined for the audience that we didn’t get to experience the revelation with him. instead we’re seeing a retread of exposition from a few weeks ago.
I’m really thinking now that everything that happened on the Cube before the heroes got there should have been on the cutting room floor. would anything of interest have been lost?
Not sure exactly what your problem was with that particular line. The “pain of living with the consciousness of death”, or at least the anxiety (or angst) this brings in the presence of infinite choice, is exactly what Kirkegaard focused on and subsequent existential writers followed up. If he was reading existential works (and I can’t remember what it was he was actually reading at the time), it’s a pretty good précis for him to give in response to being asked what he was reading.But he actually wrote that shit, appalling lines about 'the existential pain of living with the consciousness of death.'
its a pseudo-pretentious load of old wank to show he's really fucking deep maaaan. And it's a precis taken pretty much straight from wiki. The book was fictitious.Not sure exactly what your problem was with that particular line. The “pain of living with the consciousness of death”, or at least the anxiety (or angst) this brings in the presence of infinite choice, is exactly what Kirkegaard focused on and subsequent existential writers followed up. If he was reading existential works (and I can’t remember what it was he was actually reading at the time), it’s a pretty good précis for him to give in response to being asked what he was reading.
I don't think I watched more than a couple of episodes of that - I didn't like it for some reason.
Episode 6 is worth a go at least. It warms up the story a lot, and the fact that it is Picard is actually important to the story rather than incidental.Im a hardcore trekkie so it made it all the way to episode 5 before regrettably bailing.
There are moments where it is actually Picard rather than some old guy who likes playing dress up and starting fights.Episode 6 is worth a go at least. It warms up the story a lot, and the fact that it is Picard is actually important to the story rather than incidental.
I made it to three . . . Well a couple of minutes into three. I would daily do a minute or two with my daughter before we both gave up. So maybe two and five or six minutes of three.Im a hardcore trekkie so it made it all the way to episode 5 before regrettably bailing.
Apart from an intensely problematic geological formation at the very end