editor
hiraethified
So the CIA-funded mods trip to Torremolinos is still on? Phew!sparticus said:Haven't you worked it out yet. They play both sides. That's the game
So the CIA-funded mods trip to Torremolinos is still on? Phew!sparticus said:Haven't you worked it out yet. They play both sides. That's the game
I also said something about the personal integrity of the candidate and so I would understand if you chose not to vote for this person.bristol_citizen said:But I should ignore all this and "vote based on the policies contained in a manifesto" instead?
editor said:With the full might of the Icelandic green party behind it, who indeed?
Yeah! Yeah! Right on! That's exactly what I said, innit?fela fan said:Whereas great fucking big britain is a major international player. Fuck the iceland mob, they're just a tiny nation who should therefore not have a voice, and nor should they be intelligent. They must believe what britain says, coz britain is bigger and the view that is most prevalent is of course the fucking truth.
I'd say it's more down to you being a grade a cock who spouts patronising "I just know I'm right" guff from your little overseas bubble of bullshit.fela fan said:Finally i understand where i've gone wrong on urban re 911: my view is in the minority and therefore it must simply be wrong.
editor said:Yeah! Yeah! Right on! That's exactly what I said, innit?
x off the scale
I'd say it's more down to you being a grade a cock who spouts patronising "I just know I'm right" guff from your little overseas bubble of bullshit.
Seeing as you insult my intelligence with each and every one of your puffed-up, pompous I just know best maaaan pronouncements, I'd say I've been extraordinarily polite.fela fan said:Heh heh, you just love the insulting game on your own boards don't you editor?
editor said:Seeing as you insult my intelligence with each and every one of your puffed-up, pompous I just know best maaaan pronouncements, I'd say I've been extraordinarily polite.
You're perfectly entitled to your opinion, but I suspect I'm not alone in my opinion of fela's posts.shandy said:As much as I tend not to agree with many viewpoints put forward by Fela Fan, your constant retort of 'maaaan', I presume based on his use in one or two posts of phrases like, 'hey man', seems a bit like bullying to me. He says 'man' sometimes.
editor said:It's fucking infuriating and crushes any hope of an intelligent debate ("I don't need facts or evidence, man, I just know" etc etc zzzzzzzzzzzz)
Talkig of which, I wonder if he's managed to dial that hotel in Birmingham yet?bristle-krs said:you're mixing up your 'instant response' buttons, ed - that's the jazzz hot key
editor said:You're perfectly entitled to your opinion, but I suspect I'm not alone in my opinion of fela's posts.
editor said:Seeing as you insult my intelligence with each and every one of your puffed-up, pompous I just know best maaaan pronouncements, I'd say I've been extraordinarily polite.
TeeJay said:I also said something about the personal integrity of the candidate and so I would understand if you chose not to vote for this person.
However, for the sake of argument - what difference would any of these statements make to the Green Party policies that this person would be elected to advance?
If this person was elected to Bristol City council what exactly would these views impact upon?
When Green Party candidates are elected they are expected to implement Green Party polices, not simply pursue personal agendas.
I can't speak for Bristol Green Party but isn't it the case that this person is speaking in a personal capacity? Has any of this been presented as Green Party stuff?
I wouldn't be surprised if this came to a head soon, but the Green Party does have rules and a constitution that allow local parties a lot of independence, and I don't think it is easy for them to "shut people up" unless they are clearly breaking rules.
I don't know what GP rules these statements violate. I don't think there is a rule saying "thou shalt not be a fuckwit". I'd hope however that local members would take some kind of action themselves rather than having to rely on the national party to intervene.
I think you'll find that you've just released another parp from your little overseas bubble of bullshitfela fan said:It's all about how YOU react to other posters, not about the topic. It's always about how YOU feel in reaction to a post. YOU never tire of telling us how YOUR emotions are at any one time.
Advocating racist, neo-nazi shite, even in a "personal capacity" would get you kicked out of the GP extremely quickly. There is however a difference between making statements that are entirely contrary to GP policy (eg racist etc) and making personal statements (ie not as a GP statement) which aren't contrary to GP policy, but are simply "outside". For example someone supporting one football team over another isn't a GP issue - it is not GP policy or contrary to GP policy: it is simply "outside" and not connected to GP policy.bristol_citizen said:...And if I understand you correctly the self-styled "progessive" party in this country thinks they can change all this by promoting yet another total fruitloop to sit alongside the other 71 we already have courtesy of Labour, Lib-Dem and Tory?
A fruitloop who actually has nothing - whatsoever - public to say about education, transport, social services, libraries or any other service at all but is apparently a self-styled, very public, world-class expert on remote-controlled jumbo fucking jets. How useful.
And also if I understand you correctly if this fruitloop says anything at all outside of "Green Party policy" it's all right because, and I quote, "it's the case that this person is speaking in a personal capacity."
Fine. I'll join the GP, become a candidate and then maybe spend my weekends - "in a personal capacity" - dressed in an SS uniform on Corn Street, Bristol reading selected passages from 'Mein Kampf' shall I? That should be all right too. After all, "what difference would any of these statements make to the Green Party policies that I would be elected to advance?"
you can't ask someone a question, then when they answer you suggest it's nothing to do with them. mebbe if you wanted to keep it stricktly between you and pickmans you should have used pm's, and not made a post like 399 which kind of asks for a reply. but i think i see the problem anyway, youre not realising the difference between implying something and asserting something.editor said:I was drawing that conclusion from his assertion that:
(a) he's only heard police officers use the phrase and
(b) he's never heard a non-cop use the phrase
Can't see quite what it's got to do with you, mind.
Sorry, but you're really boring me now.neilh said:you can't ask someone a question, then when they answer you suggest it's nothing to do with them. mebbe if you wanted to keep it stricktly between you and pickmans you should have used pm's, and not made a post like 399 which kind of asks for a reply. but i think i see the problem anyway, youre not realising the difference between implying something and asserting something.
sparticus said:For those who missed the Brixton event there's another chance to catch Mr Shayler
9/11 CONFERENCE: “The New Pearl Harbour: Exploring Conflicting Interpretations of 9/11” COMEDY CLUB 10AM-5PM
All Day pass? €20 The Truth? Priceless. (On the Door)
<editor: advert removed>
I guess you wouldn't want to spill the secrets by telling us how the meeting went and what was said then?sparticus said:For those who missed the Brixton event there's another chance to catch Mr Shayler
9/11 CONFERENCE: “The New Pearl Harbour: Exploring Conflicting Interpretations of 9/11” COMEDY CLUB 10AM-5PM
All Day pass? €20 The Truth? Priceless. (On the Door)
<editor: advert removed>
butchersapron said:I guess you wouldn't want to spill the secrets by telling us how the meeting went and what was said then?
Links for your information: http://www.bristol-city.gov.uk/ccm/...&ShowElectionWard=true&ElectionId=57&WardId=5TeeJay said:I am taking your claim that he is a GP Bristol candidate at face value
butchersapron said:I guess you wouldn't want to spill the secrets by telling us how the meeting went and what was said then?
Oh dear!bristol_citizen said:
TeeJay said:Oh dear!
I just Googled "Tony Gosling" and got this:
http://www.bilderberg.org/tonyhom.htm
"Hi, I'm Tony Gosling, this website's editor, my contact details are near the bottom of this page. If you have a minute though, do check out why I believe The Bible (not the establishment church) is still the clearest guide to understanding the Godawful mess this world's in - by having a look in between..."
[etc]