5% of them?bristol_citizen said:Well that's two Green conspiraloons we've unearthed in Bristol with no effort. How many are there in the UK FFS?
TeeJay said:5% of them?
...which would still leave 95% who aren't.
How can I produce evidence for a *question*?rednblack said:evidence please
No on else did because it's not there.TeeJay said:How can I produce evidence for a *question*?
You did see the question mark didn't you?
The question mark was after "5% of them"...butchersapron said:No on else did because it's not there.
That's your post - however RnB is asking for evidence of the other 95% (the evidence for the 5% having already been furnished) - which was, most defintely, not followed by a question mark. Good day.TeeJay said:The question mark was after "5% of them"...
...the second line is dependent on the hypothetical 5%
butchersapron said:That's yourpost - however RnB is asking for evidence of the other 95% (the evidence for the 5% having already been furnished)
You haven't furnished evidence of 5%butchersapron said:That's yourpost - however RnB is asking for evidence of the other 95% (the evidence for the 5% having already been furnished)
"Indeedie do"?butchersapron said:Indeedie do. See above.
So it was my guess?butchersapron said:Hang on, 5% of the green Party being Loons was your guess TeeJaaY not mine. So why are you getting on your high horse about me repeating you?
Care to explain what you are saying here?butchersapron said:Oh i see, now you find my culture intolerable? Calling Dr Mengeles.
It's only a few short steps TTEJ
teejay said:In my opinion the only approach to take is to seek to attract more 'mainstream' and 'normal' people (something that seems to be happening) and rely on the weight of numbers. I think this is better than trying to "purge" people you consider to be oddballs etc.
No you muppet, that came after your guess and me deciding to take you at your word, after all you wouldn't have just came to the 5% with no serious research at all would you? WOULD YOU?TeeJay said:So it was my guess?
"the evidence for the 5% having already been furnished"
You really are a brain-addled fuckwit, aren't you?
So you think there should be a purge?bristle-krs said:so - let's get this straight - your theory to make sure dodgy agenda'd nutters like gosling don't get to be seen as the face of the greens is to... do nothing, and hope enough non-dodgy agenda'd, non-nutters just happen to join the party to dilute the effect of the dodgy agenda'd nutters..?
marvellous
like i say, i have no interest in the green party.
I wouldn't take a guess without "serious research"?butchersapron said:...after all you wouldn't have just came to the 5% with no serious research at all would you? WOULD YOU?
Read that. Of course i would guess.TeeJay said:I wouldn't take a guess without "serious research"?
Oh do shut up, you idiot.
TeeJay said:So you think there should be a purge?
You haven't provided any links.bristle-krs said:there's no real point in you talking about this until you've actually done the reading.