Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

[Sat 28th Oct 2017] London Anarchist Bookfair (London)

Are you sure of this?

I recognised her immediately at the time. I've known her for about 20 years, so yes, I'm as sure as I can be given the imperfect nature of the film.

She was the one apparently dragging someone away in a headlock or similar. If anyone can find the video on the original thread then maybe others who know her can have a look and see if they recognise her.
 
She posted that she was there so it's hardly a secret that she attended.

Helen Steel
25 September ·
I signed this letter to say violence has no place in the transgender debate. I witnessed the attack on a woman by some trans activists, I went to Speakers Corner after hearing that day about the attempts to prevent women meeting to discuss issues which affect their lives. Whatever your views on transgender politics, women have the right to discuss theirs without the threat of violence trying to silence them. We will not be silenced.
 
I recognised her immediately at the time. I've known her for about 20 years, so yes, I'm as sure as I can be given the imperfect nature of the film.

She was the one apparently dragging someone away in a headlock or similar. If anyone can find the video on the original thread then maybe others who know her can have a look and see if they recognise her.

Fuck off saying the feminists were the aggressors ffs. They organised a redirection point for a new meeting (previous one had been pressured into cancelling) and people turned up to have a pop at them.
This isn’t antifascism.
 
I recognised her immediately at the time. I've known her for about 20 years, so yes, I'm as sure as I can be given the imperfect nature of the film.

She was the one apparently dragging someone away in a headlock or similar. If anyone can find the video on the original thread then maybe others who know her can have a look and see if they recognise her.
I watched it and most certainly did not recognise her trying to drag away her mate after the attack.
 
Fuck off saying the feminists were the aggressors ffs. They organised a redirection point for a new meeting (previous one had been pressured into cancelling) and people turned up to have a pop at them.
This isn’t antifascism.

I'm not saying the feminists were the aggressors; I'm not saying HS was an aggressor.

I'm saying she was not only present but was physically involved in what went on. And if anyone can find the video that was posted (I can't remember the thread title ATM), I will happily point her out so that you and anyone else can make their own minds up.
 
I'm not saying the feminists were the aggressors; I'm not saying HS was an aggressor.

I'm saying she was not only present but was physically involved in what went on. And if anyone can find the video that was posted (I can't remember the thread title ATM), I will happily point her out so that you and anyone else can make their own minds up.

Surely it exists at the start of the original thread (and a million places all over twitter)
 
Found it! It's from post 406 on page 14 of the original thread. I'm not tagging in the original poster because I don't think they're involved in the current thread.



HS is wearing dark jacket and trousers, blue shirt and green rucsac. She enters screen from the right at about 0.16 and drags someone else away. She's also visible in the background from about 0.34 onwards. It's easier to see if you watch at 1/4 speed.

I'm not saying anything about the rightness or wrongness of her actions on that occasion or on Saturday, but I'm as sure as I can be that it's her.

As butchers said above, there may have been unfinished business with her, although I have no idea what happened on Saturday other than what I've read here, and have no idea who any of the other people involved were.

ETA in fact, she's also visible in the still pic before you start the video
 
Found it! It's from post 406 on page 14 of the original thread. I'm not tagging in the original poster because I don't think they're involved in the current thread.



HS is wearing dark jacket and trousers, blue shirt and green rucsac. She enters screen from the left at about 0.16 and drags someone else away. She's also visible in the background from about 0.34 onwards. It's easier to see if you watch at 1/4 speed.

I'm not saying anying about the rightness or wrongness of her actions, but I'm as sure as I can be that it's her.

As butchers said above, there may have been unfinished business with her, although I have no idea what happened on Saturday other than what I've read here, and have no idea who any of the other people involved were.


Women were attacked for wanting a meeting to discuss what it means to be women. Let that sink in.
 
That wasn't her.

Are you sure? How are you sure? How well do you know her?

She and I have lived in the same part of Tottenham for 20 years and I have known her in various contexts, met and talked to her one-on-one and in various groups regularly and frequently in that time. I'm sure it's her.
 
Are you sure? How are you sure? How well do you know her?

She and I have lived in the same part of Tottenham for 20 years and I have known her in various contexts, met and talked to her one-on-one and in various groups regularly and frequently in that time. I'm sure it's her.
Because a) i know her too and b) the person who it was has talked at length about it, and was identified by the enemy - all in that thread you went back and took it from.
 
Because a) i know her too and b) the person who it was has talked at length about it, and was identified by the enemy - all in that thread you went back and took it from.

Can you expand on this bit, I'm not sure if I read all the thread after the first 20 odd pages.
 
Found it! It's from post 406 on page 14 of the original thread. I'm not tagging in the original poster because I don't think they're involved in the current thread.



HS is wearing dark jacket and trousers, blue shirt and green rucsac. She enters screen from the right at about 0.16 and drags someone else away. She's also visible in the background from about 0.34 onwards. It's easier to see if you watch at 1/4 speed.

I'm not saying anything about the rightness or wrongness of her actions on that occasion or on Saturday, but I'm as sure as I can be that it's her.

As butchers said above, there may have been unfinished business with her, although I have no idea what happened on Saturday other than what I've read here, and have no idea who any of the other people involved were.

ETA in fact, she's also visible in the still pic before you start the video


I'd read that as intervening to drag someone away from being whelped on by other people.
 
Back
Top Bottom