Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
Not really.Can you be a bit more vague?
Not really.Can you be a bit more vague?
I can understand you living your life without understanding or insight into the Troubles and why your quip might have hit a nerve re the anti-Catholic bigotry that many people with Irish heritage might be very much alive to. What I don't understand is your doubling down when it's pointed out.all this just for one quip! I can’t pretend that I understand what the fuss is about tbh
What is any of that to do with what i said?I can understand you living your life without understanding or insight into the Troubles and why your quip might have hit a nerve re the anti-Catholic bigotry that many people with Irish heritage might be very much alive to. What I don't understand is your doubling down when it's pointed out.
It doesn't really matter if you don't understand. But if you upset someone or more than one someone, all you need to do is apologise if you didn't mean it. If you did or don't care, just carry on innit.What is any of that to do with what i said?
i hear you're a racist now?What is any of that to do with what i said?
He truly fucking is.Brand's a cunt.
HTH.
Well, I take as a starting point that you can attack religious hierarchies, the scandals, the misogyny of religions. Fill your boots. But individual beliefs are different. These may be deeply held, they involve identity and a sense of community. Some of that might itself be problematic, but it's about a mix of who people are and who they choose to be.Why the fuck am I getting shit for this, on a thread about Russell Brand? When the ‘joke, if you can even call it that was on Brand, not Christianity or Jesus. And Brand’s motives were what were originally being questioned here, not Christianity itself.
This is the biggie really; pointing out the silly shit in the Bible won't get you much mileage against a Jesuit theologian as they've dealt with those objections for years, but core tenets such as OS are just plain wrong, even if I do recall some decent attempts at justification.Concept of original sin? Perfectly fine?
neither will droning on like a ministerWell, I take as a starting point that you can attack religious hierarchies, the scandals, the misogyny of religions. Fill your boots. But individual beliefs are different. These may be deeply held, they involve identity and a sense of community. Some of that might itself be problematic, but it's about a mix of who people are and who they choose to be.
I also take it as obvious that your 'joke' would be pretty offensive to Christians. You can make those 'jokes' if you want and I've probably said things in the past that would be offensive to Christians and others. But really, being a 'grown up', means having a bit of respect, not being deliberately offensive. That's about it really. Except to add - Serge Forward 's point - that being deliberately offensive isn't a great way to build solidarity.
All of them I know are just in for the schools. It's nuts anyone could genuinely believe, but there is a stranglehold to break. Who knows what happens when it stops,,,
is it a bad thing to have issues with Christianity anyway? What’s wrong with disagreeing with ideas you find problematic?
i hate all religious institutions. And it’s not even just religious institutions that protect and shelter abusers. I’m sure all large organisations and institutions do.
all this just for one quip! I can’t pretend that I understand what the fuss is about tbh
There is of course a rather aulder tradition but we rarely mention the gnostics here these daysThat's a Calvinist distortion of what Christianity teaches. The Orthodox faith teaches that heaven and hell are about the inner state of the individual. According to this older tradition, we all end up in the company of God, but those who love God will experience that company as heaven, and those that hate God will experience it as hell.
Is this still about my comment on Russell Brand’s personal hygiene? I wasn’t being deliberately offensive. It was just a quip that I did not imagine would offend anyone. No one commented at the time, so I’m puzzled as to why it’s now an issue. I apologise for offending anyone with that comment. It wasn’t my intention.Well, I take as a starting point that you can attack religious hierarchies, the scandals, the misogyny of religions. Fill your boots. But individual beliefs are different. These may be deeply held, they involve identity and a sense of community. Some of that might itself be problematic, but it's about a mix of who people are and who they choose to be.
I also take it as obvious that your 'joke' would be pretty offensive to Christians. You can make those 'jokes' if you want and I've probably said things in the past that would be offensive to Christians and others. But really, being a 'grown up', means having a bit of respect, not being deliberately offensive. That's about it really. Except to add - Serge Forward 's point - that being deliberately offensive isn't a great way to build solidarity.
Agree with this bit especially.Meister Echeirt has entered the chat.
Prob one of the most influential thinkers of all time and a Catholic. There’s a lot there and Dawkins-like new atheist “ throw it all away” gets more and more shallow seeming as the years go on. There’s more in the Upanishads to inspire than I’ve found in most places. A book that has inspired the most Logical philosophers for centuries. Infact most western philosophers worth their weight are tied up with the metaphysics that religion has talked about for centuries. So reductive and dismissive to throw out “all religions are a waste of time”, especially when the main meaning of life for so many now seems to be material comfort as salvation. There’s a lot that’s truly radical in religious thought and a lot that is inspiring today’s radicals. The mystical tradition for example which has little of the supernatural but all of the mind blowing practices and insights is one such line of thought that has come from religion, not to mention ethics, etc. pantheism makes more sense to me than atheism and you don’t even have to ascribe a god, you could call god in pantheism absoloute nothingness which the Buddhists do. Absolute nothingness therefor everything then is the Absolute - that to me makes far more sense than using the limited human mind and senses to understand “reality”. Infact I would hasten to add that the more ordinary religious metaphysics is explored the more the reductive scientific materialism that we all live under seems lacking. The scientist who looks down a microscope is always looking within a context, and what he is seeing is filtered through the human brain. The people who go around just barking “religions a load of shit, and fairy tales, it’s all about the facts and reason” are really dwarfed by a whole history of very logical thought thought that they do not understand in the slightest.
I think "neighbour" as used in the Bible means anyone in the local community. So no, sorry. But if she lives in Helsinki you've found a loophole.So it's OK if she lives round the corner?
Sorry, global village, space-time compression... the space for a bit of extra-marital non-neighbourly how's your father is rapidly shrinking.I think "neighbour" as used in the Bible means anyone in the local community. So no, sorry. But if she lives in Helsinki you've found a loophole.
There is of course a rather aulder tradition but we rarely mention the gnostics here these days
not sure where i had a go at any individual here apart from Russell BrandWell, I take as a starting point that you can attack religious hierarchies, the scandals, the misogyny of religions. Fill your boots. But individual beliefs are different. These may be deeply held, they involve identity and a sense of community. Some of that might itself be problematic, but it's about a mix of who people are and who they choose to be.
I don't think anyone has accused you having a go at an individual.not sure where i had a go at any individual here apart from Russell Brand
Why was it brought up then?I don't think anyone has accused you having a go at an individual.
not sure where i had a go at any individual here apart from Russell Brand
General Consensus was such a cunt that Queen Victoria led the mob that pulled his statue down and threw into Mr Bazalgette's sewerGeneral consensus.