Is Rorymac still around? He was class, I enjoyed a few real life pints with him too.All good cheers.
Yep. Most of the old bellends are still here. One or two new ones.
I've never seen it but this doesn't make it sound like the thing I'd want to actively support
The Grayzone - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
Is "The Grayzone" a legitimate investigative journalism site?
Answer (1 of 13): Investigative journalism is way too strong a term for what The Grayzone does. The site seems to be largely a political advocacy group with a mishmash of views that look quite strange to someone used to mainstream western journalism. To be polite, it seems to be pushing news as ...www.quora.com
can you see the Qanon telegram chats at the bottom of the well yet?
Yes, well, you would, wouldn't you?I suggest taking a look for yourself, it's easy to throw smears around. I think the video I posted above is very good commentary.
Stuck him on ignore already, fuck reading endless pages of George Galloway like drivel every day.
led by son of a wealthy Clinton advisor, Max Blumenthal and his zany “never met a Human Rights violation we didn’t like” cohorts at Grayzone . They receive helping hands from a number of shady media organizations and fringe voices that include Russian disinformation network RT, TeleSur in South America, reknown racists Richard Spencer, Tucker Carlson, a nazi school shooter and even ex-KKK wizard David Duke.
These fearless champions of state-violence cheer police forces brutalizing protesters, deny well-documented death squads and rationalize oppression at every turn.
Despite Blumenthal’s attacks on journalists who work for publications funded by Soros, he has had no problem accepting money from that source in the past, such as when he worked for the Nation, whose parent company, TYPE Media Center is funded in part by grants from the man he so often demonizes, nor from his time at “Media Matters” which has also enjoyed Soros funding. Oh, and also AlterNet, who helped him develop Grayzone until 2018, when they fired him, presumably because his conspiracy theory mongering was damaging their reputation.
Nor has he been above accepting gifts from the regimes he writes so flatteringly about. Blumenthal and other writers at Grayzone have also been exposed accepting “journalism prizes” from pro-Assad lobby groups.
Do you really think joking about conspiracy theorist shite is appropriate in a thread about multiple women and girls being raped and sexually abused? People like Blumenthal perpetuate this culture of covering up gross misogyny.And we're off!
Welcome back, Phil.
As I say, it's easy to throw smears around, and I've no interest in factionalism. I evaluate forums based on their content, and I find Blumenthal in particular to be an excellent reporter.
Fuck off.As I say, it's easy to throw smears around, and I've no interest in factionalism. I evaluate forums based on their content, and I find Blumenthal in particular to be an excellent reporter.
Do you really think joking about conspiracy theorist shite is appropriate in a thread about multiple women and girls being raped and sexually abused? People like Blumenthal perpetuate this culture of covering up gross misogyny.
I just did. But fuck off.It would help if you'd post an example. These unsubstantiated smears are tedious.
So you're just going to ignore all the comments and links you don't like, yes?I suggest taking a look for yourself, it's easy to throw smears around. I think the video I posted above is very good commentary.
And so your are immediately reduced to monosyllabic obscenity. That tells me all I need to know about your argument. The Greyzone goes up in my estimation.Fuck off.
So you're just going to ignore all the comments you don't like, yes?
You have several years of learning to catch up with, so.You should make a particular point of reading material with which you disagree. That's how you learn.
I don't remember you being this bad, phil. But not really a surprise to see you've fallen into the rabbit hole. Never forgot that thread where you proved the existence of God though, that was a banger.
Aw, dwyer used to be the WUM that teuchter can only dream of being. Be a shame if he's hit his 'returning Ernesto' phase.
So you're OK with some buck-chasing social media commentator spouting provably false horseshit and conspiracy grifting crap because you like their hot take on other topics?You should make a particular point of reading material with which you disagree. That's how you learn.
The Grayzone publishes questionable material, stating that a Chemical Attack did not occur in Douma, Syria OPCW investigator testifies at UN that no chemical attack took place in Douma, Syria. They have also promoted conspiracy theories, such as claiming that Pete Buttigieg is a CIA agent. There is no evidence to support this claim. Finally, according to Radio Free Asia, The Grayzone content is frequently shared by the Chinese Communist Party media outlets “CCP propaganda is also increasingly laundered through Western influencers and denialist fringe media outlets like The Grayzone,” the report said, adding that, between December 2019 and February 2021, The Grayzone was cited at least 313 times in Chinese state media.”
Finally, The Grayzone promotes conspiracy theories involving George Soros funding regime changes, and the editor Max Blumenthal claims that Bill Gates ran a Covid simulation before it occurred. This is false. In general, The Grayzone promotes a socialist left perspective that promotes conspiracy theories and pro-Russian/Chinese propaganda.
So you're OK with some buck-chasing social media commentator spouting provably false horseshit and conspiracy grifting crap because you like their hot take on other topics?
worse people to be confused with in the history of urban, tbf.I always got you confused with Flimsier.
Could we go straight to the threadban? Would it be justified - no - but funny as fuck.So you're just going to ignore all the comments and links you don't like, yes?
And with four words so much of the problem of conspiraloonery is summarised. Information quality? Political agenda? Funding? Prior behaviour? None of it matters, there's no evidence "I agree with" that my sources aren't great.I disagree with them.